Heterogeneity in sources of exposure variability among groups of workers exposed to inorganic mercury.
暂无分享,去创建一个
E Symanski | W Chan | G Sällsten | W. Chan | E. Symanski | L. Barregard | G. Sällsten | L Barregård
[1] A. Dyer,et al. Statistical methods to assess and minimize the role of intra-individual variability in obscuring the relationship between dietary lipids and serum cholesterol. , 1978, Journal of chronic diseases.
[2] Östen Einarsson,et al. A computerized automatic apparatus for determination of mercury in biological samples , 1984, The Journal of automatic chemistry.
[3] L. Alessio,et al. Reliability of urinary creatinine as a parameter used to adjust values of urinary biological indicators , 1985, International archives of occupational and environmental health.
[4] Steve Selvin,et al. Benzene Exposure in the Petroleum Refining Industry , 1987 .
[5] H. Kromhout,et al. Agreement between qualitative exposure estimates and quantitative exposure measurements. , 1987, American journal of industrial medicine.
[6] R. Hornung,et al. Estimation of Average Concentration in the Presence of Nondetectable Values , 1990 .
[7] Hans Kromhout,et al. Use and analysis of exposure monitoring data in occupational epidemiology: an example of an epidemiological study in the Dutch animal food industry. , 1991 .
[8] E. Symanski,et al. A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[9] H Kromhout,et al. Variation of exposure between workers in homogeneous exposure groups. , 1993, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.
[10] S M Rappaport,et al. An exposure-assessments strategy accounting for within- and between-worker sources of variability. , 1995, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[11] M. Nieuwenhuijsen,et al. Flour dust exposure variability in flour mills and bakeries. , 1995, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[12] L. Kupper,et al. The relationship between environmental monitoring and biological markers in exposure assessment. , 1995, Environmental health perspectives.
[13] H. Kromhout,et al. Occupational epidemiology in the rubber industry: implications of exposure variability. , 1995, American journal of industrial medicine.
[14] H Kromhout,et al. Assessment and grouping of occupational magnetic field exposure in five electric utility companies. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.
[15] J. Evans,et al. Worker exposure to endotoxin, phenolic compounds, and formaldehyde in a fiberglass insulation manufacturing plant. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.
[16] S. Kumagai,et al. Cobalt exposure level and variability in the hard metal industry of Japan. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.
[17] L. Sheppard,et al. Maximizing accuracy and precision using individual and grouped exposure assessments. , 1996, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.
[18] H. Kromhout,et al. The influence of random exposure estimation error on the exposure-response relationship when grouping into homogeneous exposure categories. , 1996 .
[19] Hans Kromhout,et al. Estimates of individual dose from current measurements of exposure. , 1996 .
[20] H Kromhout,et al. Grouping strategies for exposure to inhalable dust, wheat allergens and alpha-amylase allergens in bakeries. , 1997, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[21] H Kromhout,et al. Efficiency of different grouping schemes for dust exposure in the European carbon black respiratory morbidity study. , 1997, Occupational and environmental medicine.
[22] Robert H. Lyles,et al. Assessing Regulatory Compliance of Occupational Exposures Via the Balanced One-Way Random Effects ANOVA Model , 1997 .
[23] Phyllis Schiller Myers. Compliance versus Risk in Assessing Occupational Exposures , 1997 .
[24] Magdalena Niewiadomska-Bugaj,et al. Probability and statistical inference , 1998 .
[25] L. Kupper,et al. Individual-based and group-based occupational exposure assessment: some equations to evaluate different strategies. , 1998, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[26] L. Kupper,et al. Comprehensive evaluation of long-term trends in occupational exposure: Part 1. Description of the database. , 1998, Occupational and environmental medicine.
[27] H Kromhout,et al. Individual-based and group-based occupational exposure assessment: some equations to evaluate different strategies. , 1998, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[28] Lawrence L. Kupper,et al. Application of mixed models to assess exposures monitored by construction workers during hot processes , 1999 .
[29] Elena Losina,et al. An introduction to hierarchical linear modelling , 1999 .
[30] L. Kupper,et al. Application of mixed models to assess exposures monitored by construction workers during hot processes. , 1999, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[31] D. Savitz,et al. Refinements in magnetic field exposure assignment for a case-cohort study of electrical utility workers. , 1999, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[32] E Symanski,et al. Variability in airborne and biological measures of exposure to mercury in the chloralkali industry: implications for epidemiologic studies. , 2000, Environmental health perspectives.
[33] H Kromhout,et al. Trends in levels of inhalable dust exposure, exceedance and overexposure in the European carbon black manufacturing industry. , 2000, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[34] E. Symanski,et al. Inter- and intra-individual sources of variation in levels of urinary styrene metabolites , 2001, International archives of occupational and environmental health.
[35] E Symanski,et al. Mixed-effects models for the evaluation of long-term trends in exposure levels with an example from the nickel industry. , 2001, The Annals of occupational hygiene.
[36] F. Neuhann,et al. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices , 2001 .