Sensitivity of isoclinic data using various phase shifting techniques in digital photoelasticity towards generalized error sources

Photoelasticity is a whole field experimental technique to obtain stress fields in both 2-D and 3-D elasticity problems. The accuracy of parameter evaluation by digital photoelastic techniques depends on the choice of the optical arrangements for parameter estimation, the inherent error in optical elements and any misalignments introduced during experimentation. A generic approach to simulation of error in digital photoelasticity by Jones calculus is presented in this paper. Of late it has been shown that the quarter-wave plate mismatch error is varying and is not a constant value. The present simulation accounts for inherent variable error in quarter-wave plates and also accommodates the error arising due to the optical misalignment of the various optical elements. The applicability of the new methodology is shown for different phase shifting techniques. A comparative study among various techniques is done regarding sensitivity to general error sources and it is found that the ten-step method is the least sensitive among them all. Therefore usage of the ten-step method is thus recommended while using manual polariscope for digital photoelastic applications.

[1]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  A New Six-Step Phase Shifting Technique Using Mixed-Polariscope in Digital Photoelasticity , 2006 .

[3]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Comparative Study of Evaluation of Primary Isoclinic Data by Various Spatial Domain Methods in Digital Photoelasticity , 2006 .

[4]  Eann A. Patterson,et al.  Towards full field automated photoelastic analysis of complex components , 1991 .

[5]  S. K. Mangal,et al.  Use of multiple loads to extract continuous isoclinic fringes by phase shifting technique , 1999 .

[6]  Eann A. Patterson,et al.  Simulation of errors in automated photoelasticity , 1998 .

[7]  Giovanni Petrucci,et al.  Phase shifting photoelasticity in white light , 2007 .

[8]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Simulation of Error in Digital Photoelasticity by Jones Calculus , 2001 .

[9]  James C. Brown,et al.  A wave-induced fatigue strain recorder for surface ships. Discussion. Authors' closure , 1999 .

[10]  M. Ramji,et al.  Whole field evaluation of stress components in digital photoelasticity—Issues, implementation and application , 2008 .

[11]  J. A. Quiroga,et al.  Method of error analysis for phase-measuring algorithms applied to photoelasticity. , 1998, Applied optics.

[12]  B. Zuccarello,et al.  The influence of the quarter wave plates in automated photoelasticity , 2002 .

[13]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Phase-shifting methodologies in photoelastic analysis—the application of Jones calculus , 1996 .

[14]  J A Quiroga,et al.  Phase measuring algorithm for extraction of isochromatics of photoelastic fringe patterns. , 1997, Applied optics.

[15]  Sandro Barone,et al.  Computer aided photoelasticity by an optimum phase stepping method , 2002 .

[16]  K. T. Ramesh,et al.  Adaptive Quality Guided Phase Unwrapping Algorithm for Whole‐Field Digital Photoelastic Parameter Estimation of Complex Models , 2010 .

[17]  B. Zuccarello,et al.  Photoelastic stress pattern analysis using Fourier transform with carrier fringes: influence of quarter-wave plate error , 2002 .