Evaluation of Ground Surface Models Derived from Unmanned Aerial Systems with Digital Aerial Photogrammetry in a Disturbed Conifer Forest

Detailed vertical forest structure information can be remotely sensed by combining technologies of unmanned aerial systems (UAS) and digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP). A key limitation in the application of DAP methods, however, is the inability to produce accurate digital elevation models (DEM) in areas of dense vegetation. This study investigates the terrain modeling potential of UAS-DAP methods within a temperate conifer forest in British Columbia, Canada. UAS-acquired images were photogrammetrically processed to produce high-resolution DAP point clouds. To evaluate the terrain modeling ability of DAP, first, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to estimate optimal parameters of three ground-point classification algorithms designed for airborne laser scanning (ALS). Algorithms tested include progressive triangulated irregular network (TIN) densification (PTD), hierarchical robust interpolation (HRI) and simple progressive morphological filtering (SMRF). Points were classified as ground from the ALS and served as ground-truth data to which UAS-DAP derived DEMs were compared. The proportion of area with root mean square error (RMSE) <1.5 m were 56.5%, 51.6% and 52.3% for the PTD, HRI and SMRF methods respectively. To assess the influence of terrain slope and canopy cover, error values of DAP-DEMs produced using optimal parameters were compared to stratified classes of canopy cover and slope generated from ALS point clouds. Results indicate that canopy cover was approximately three times more influential on RMSE than terrain slope.

[1]  J. Means,et al.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning lidar , 2000 .

[2]  Roger Clarke,et al.  The regulation of civilian drones' impacts on public safety , 2014, Comput. Law Secur. Rev..

[3]  Terje Gobakken,et al.  Influence of Plot Size on Efficiency of Biomass Estimates in Inventories of Dry Tropical Forests Assisted by Photogrammetric Data from an Unmanned Aircraft System , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[4]  Branka Cuca,et al.  RC-Heli and Structure & Motion Techniques for the 3-D Reconstruction of a Milan Dome Spire , 2009 .

[5]  E. Næsset.  Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[6]  Nithya Rajan,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for High-Throughput Phenotyping and Agronomic Research , 2016, PloS one.

[7]  Adam J. Mathews,et al.  Visualizing and Quantifying Vineyard Canopy LAI Using an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Collected High Density Structure from Motion Point Cloud , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[8]  E. Næsset.  Point accuracy of combined pseudorange and carrier phase differential GPS under forest canopy , 1999 .

[9]  Xiangguo Lin,et al.  Filtering airborne LiDAR data by embedding smoothness-constrained segmentation in progressive TIN densification , 2013 .

[10]  I. Korpela.  Individual tree measurements by means of digital aerial photogrammetry , 2004, Silva Fennica Monographs.

[11]  M. Nilsson.  Estimation of tree heights and stand volume using an airborne lidar system , 1996 .

[12]  Martin J. Wooster,et al.  Assessment of Errors Caused by Forest Vegetation Structure in Airborne LiDAR-Derived DTMs , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[13]  U. Helava.  Digital correlation in photogrammetric instruments , 1978 .

[14]  L. Wallace,et al.  Assessment of Forest Structure Using Two UAV Techniques: A Comparison of Airborne Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2016 .

[15]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  An improved simple morphological filter for the terrain classification of airborne LIDAR data , 2013 .

[16]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index , 2011 .

[17]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[18]  K. Kraus,et al.  Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data , 1998 .

[19]  Kazukiyo Yamamoto,et al.  Estimating individual tree heights of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR , 2005, Journal of Forest Research.

[20]  F. Neitzel,et al.  Mobile 3d Mapping with a Low-Cost Uav System , 2012 .

[21]  M. Tomé,et al.  Use of multi-temporal UAV-derived imagery for estimating individual tree growth in Pinus pinea stands , 2017 .

[22]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  New Associate Editor pp iii-iv Segmentation of airborne laser scanning data using a slope adaptive neighborhood , 2006 .

[23]  Emmanuel P. Baltsavias,et al.  A comparison between photogrammetry and laser scanning , 1999 .

[24]  Peter Axelsson,et al.  Processing of laser scanner data-algorithms and applications , 1999 .

[25]  K. Oost,et al.  Reproducibility of UAV-based earth topography reconstructions based on Structure-from-Motion algorithms , 2016 .

[26]  W. W. Carson,et al.  Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy , 2003 .

[27]  S. N. Lane,et al.  Application of Digital Photogrammetry to Complex Topography for Geomorphological Research , 2000 .

[28]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Vegetation Phenology Driving Error Variation in Digital Aerial Photogrammetrically Derived Terrain Models , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[29]  James D. Hamilton.  The Causes and Consequences of Rising Food Prices: Discussion , 2009 .

[30]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Assessing the utility of lidar remote sensing technology to identify mule deer winter habitat , 2010 .

[31]  N. Coops,et al.  Estimating burn severity from Landsat dNBR and RdNBR indices across western Canada. , 2010 .

[32]  P. Axelsson.  DEM Generation from Laser Scanner Data Using Adaptive TIN Models , 2000 .

[33]  Chengcui Zhang,et al.  A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[34]  P. Jat,et al.  Bayesian Maximum Entropy space/time estimation of surface water chloride in Maryland using river distances. , 2016, Environmental pollution.

[35]  P. Bolstad,et al.  Forest canopy, terrain, and distance effects on global positioning system point accuracy , 1996 .

[36]  E. Næsset,et al.  Digital aerial photogrammetry can efficiently support large-area forest inventories in Norway , 2017 .

[37]  S. M. Jong,et al.  Mapping landslide displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography , 2014 .

[38]  J. M.R,et al.  UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide : Evaluation and results , 2014 .

[39]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Georeferenced Point Clouds Produced via Multi-View Stereopsis from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[40]  Li Yan,et al.  A Multi-Constraint Combined Method for Ground Surface Point Filtering from Mobile LiDAR Point Clouds , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[41]  Antonio Luis Montealegre,et al.  A Comparison of Open-Source LiDAR Filtering Algorithms in a Mediterranean Forest Environment , 2015, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[42]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  An Automated Technique for Generating Georectified Mosaics from Ultra-High Resolution Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Imagery, Based on Structure from Motion (SfM) Point Clouds , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[43]  C. Bettigole,et al.  Mapping tree density at a global scale , 2015, Nature.

[44]  Amirreza Kosari,et al.  Novel minimum time trajectory planning in terrain following flights , 2007 .

[45]  Piermaria Corona,et al.  Area-based lidar-assisted estimation of forest standing volume , 2008 .

[46]  C. Silva,et al.  Individual tree detection from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) derived canopy height model in an open canopy mixed conifer forest , 2017 .

[47]  J. A. Tullis,et al.  An Evaluation of Lidar-derived Elevation and Terrain Slope in Leaf-off Conditions , 2005 .

[48]  Masayuki Itoh,et al.  Estimating Tree Height and Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) from Digital Surface Models and Orthophotos Obtained with an Unmanned Aerial System for a Japanese Cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) Forest , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[49]  L. Vierling,et al.  Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling , 2008 .

[50]  Wuming Zhang,et al.  An Easy-to-Use Airborne LiDAR Data Filtering Method Based on Cloth Simulation , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[51]  Y. Hu,et al.  Mapping canopy height using a combination of digital stereo‐photogrammetry and lidar , 2008 .

[52]  Marco Dubbini,et al.  Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) for High-Resolution Reconstruction of Topography: The Structure from Motion Approach on Coastal Environments , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[53]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Updating residual stem volume estimates using ALS- and UAV-acquired stereo-photogrammetric point clouds , 2017 .

[54]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Combining Multi-Date Airborne Laser Scanning and Digital Aerial Photogrammetric Data for Forest Growth and Yield Modelling , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[55]  M. Mokroš,et al.  Accuracy of Photogrammetric UAV-Based Point Clouds under Conditions of Partially-Open Forest Canopy , 2017 .

[56]  L. Rodriguez,et al.  Comparison of ALS- and UAV(SfM)-derived high-density point clouds for individual tree detection in Eucalyptus plantations , 2018, International Journal of Remote Sensing.

[57]  George Vosselman,et al.  Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-Earth extraction from airborne laser scanning point clouds , 2004 .

[58]  Tetsuji Ota,et al.  Aboveground Biomass Estimation Using Structure from Motion Approach with Aerial Photographs in a Seasonal Tropical Forest , 2015 .

[59]  Nikolay Strigul,et al.  3D tree dimensionality assessment using photogrammetry and small unmanned aerial vehicles , 2015 .

[60]  Martin Isenburg,et al.  Generating Raster DEM from Mass Points Via TIN Streaming , 2006, GIScience.

[61]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[62]  P. Jat,et al.  A novel geostatistical approach combining Euclidean and gradual-flow covariance models to estimate fecal coliform along the Haw and Deep rivers in North Carolina , 2018, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment.

[63]  B. Koch,et al.  A Lidar Point Cloud Based Procedure for Vertical Canopy Structure Analysis And 3D Single Tree Modelling in Forest , 2008, Sensors.

[64]  Martin A. Fischler,et al.  Computational Stereo , 1982, CSUR.

[65]  M. Fladeland,et al.  Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation , 2003 .

[66]  Bhaskar Saha,et al.  Battery health management system for electric UAVs , 2011, 2011 Aerospace Conference.

[67]  Adam J. Mathews,et al.  Assessment of Image-Based Point Cloud Products to Generate a Bare Earth Surface and Estimate Canopy Heights in a Woodland Ecosystem , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[68]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[69]  Kaiguang Zhao,et al.  Ground Filtering Algorithms for Airborne LiDAR Data: A Review of Critical Issues , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[70]  Joanne C. White,et al.  A best practices guide for generating forest inventory attributes from airborne laser scanning data using an area-based approach , 2013 .