Architectural design and the brain: effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions

Abstract We examined the effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure—defined as perceived visual and locomotive permeability—on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architectural design. Furthermore, to gain traction on the mechanisms driving the observed effects, we employed functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to explore their neural correlates. Rooms with higher ceilings were more likely to be judged as beautiful, and activated structures involved in visuospatial exploration and attention in the dorsal stream. Open rooms were more likely to be judged as beautiful, and activated structures underlying perceived visual motion. Additionally, enclosed rooms were more likely to elicit exit decisions and activated the anterior midcingulate cortex (aMCC)—the region within the cingulate gyrus with direct projections from the amygdala. This suggests that a reduction in perceived visual and locomotive permeability characteristic of enclosed spaces might elicit an emotional reaction that accompanies exit decisions.

[1]  M. Kringelbach The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Neuroaesthetics , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[4]  Mandeep K. Dhami,et al.  Neural bases of judgment and decision making , 2011 .

[5]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  The Neural Basis for Spatial Relations , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  B. Vogt Pain and emotion interactions in subregions of the cingulate gyrus , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  J. Baird,et al.  Room preference as a function of architectural features and user activities. , 1978 .

[9]  Oshin Vartanian,et al.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  M. Hallett,et al.  Cerebral Processes Related to Visuomotor Imagery and Generation of Simple Finger Movements Studied with Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[11]  K. Berridge,et al.  Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals , 2008, Psychopharmacology.

[12]  D. Pandya,et al.  Cingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: II. Cortical afferents , 1987, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[13]  M. Husain,et al.  Control of Visuotemporal Attention by Inferior Parietal and Superior Temporal Cortex , 2002, Current Biology.

[14]  L. Cosmides,et al.  The Adapted mind : evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture , 1992 .

[15]  E. Weber,et al.  Content and Discontent: Indications and Implications of Domain Specificity in Preferential Decision Making , 1995 .

[16]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[17]  N Burgess,et al.  Unilateral temporal lobectomy patients show lateralized topographical and episodic memory deficits in a virtual town. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  G Franz,et al.  An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in VR - Exploring relations between features and affective appraisals of rectangular interiors , 2003, eCAADe proceedings.

[19]  Helmut Leder,et al.  Art in Time and Space: Context Modulates the Relation between Art Experience and Viewing Time , 2014, PloS one.

[20]  B. Mesquita,et al.  The experience of emotion. , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Action Concepts in the Brain: An Activation Likelihood Estimation Meta-analysis , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Object vision and spatial vision: two cortical pathways , 1983, Trends in Neurosciences.

[24]  Edward A. Vessel,et al.  The neural basis of scene preferences , 2007, Neuroreport.

[25]  Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors , 1993 .

[26]  Arthur E Stamps,et al.  Perceived Enclosure of Space, Angle above Observer, and Distance to Boundary , 2004, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  D. Crammond Motor imagery: never in your wildest dream , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[28]  G. Cupchik,et al.  PERCEPTIONS OF INTERIOR SPACES , 1996 .

[29]  E. Wilson,et al.  The biophilia hypothesis , 1993 .

[30]  R. Schofield,et al.  The Four Books of Architecture , 2013 .

[31]  Rick Grush,et al.  The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  J. Decety The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery , 1996, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  The parahippocampus subserves topographical learning in man , 1996, NeuroImage.

[34]  R. Millward,et al.  The Experience of Landscape , 1988 .

[35]  K. Berridge Food reward: Brain substrates of wanting and liking , 1996, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[36]  Terrence J. Sejnowski,et al.  The Computational Brain , 1996, Artif. Intell..

[37]  C. B. Cave,et al.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism. , 1992 .

[39]  Daniel N. Bub,et al.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES CONFRONTING PET AND fMRI STUDIES OF COGNITIVE FUNCTION , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[40]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[41]  Poul Henning Kirkegaard,et al.  Can architectural design alter the physiological reaction to psychosocial stress? A virtual TSST experiment , 2014, Physiology & Behavior.

[42]  Edward A. Vessel,et al.  Perceptual Pleasure and the Brain , 2006 .

[43]  Jack L. Nasar,et al.  Environmental aesthetics : theory, research, and applications , 1988 .

[44]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Cortical thickness changes following spatial navigation training in adulthood and aging , 2012, NeuroImage.

[45]  Beatrice Picon-Vallin,et al.  Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors , 2016 .

[46]  S. Kaplan Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition , 1987 .

[47]  S. Rauch,et al.  Masked Presentations of Emotional Facial Expressions Modulate Amygdala Activity without Explicit Knowledge , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[48]  William A. Cunningham,et al.  Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. , 2009, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[49]  M. Hallett,et al.  Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: a time-course study with functional MRI. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[50]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Visual Permeability, Locomotive Permeability, Safety, and Enclosure , 2005 .

[51]  A. Cavanna,et al.  The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[52]  R. Poldrack Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Robert L. Ryan,et al.  With people in mind : design and management of everyday nature , 1998 .

[54]  Grant Hildebrand,et al.  Origins of architectural pleasure , 1999 .

[55]  N. Burgess Spatial Cognition and the Brain , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[56]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[57]  A. Stamps Effects of Permeability on Perceived Enclosure and Spaciousness , 2010 .

[58]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference , 2009 .

[59]  Lisa Feldman Barrett,et al.  The Structure of Emotion , 2006 .

[60]  R. C. Oldfield THE ASSESSMENT AND ANALYSIS OF HANDEDNESS , 1971 .