TEAMS BETWEEN HIERARCHY AND COMMITMENT: CHANGE STRATEGIES AND THE ‘INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT’*

The main objective of the article is to put forward a broader resource‐based view, outlining the influence exercised by the ‘internal environment’on the conception and implementation of teamworking strategies in two multinational automobile companies. While the influence of various external contingent factors — industry, product, technological environment — is often considered in the literature, the role of a firm's internal resources is mostly neglected. the publicity of greenfield‐site teamwork arrangements and the concurrent lack of ‘grounded’research has nurtured the idea that within the same industry environment, a best model of teamwork can be identified. One implication of the resource‐based view presented here is that a best model of teamwork may have little relevance for many established companies, where the choice to embrace such a model does not exist. the article analyses companies’approaches to accommodating business policy objectives within their existing structural and historical constraints, including traditional modes of control, management style, and company culture. the article thus identifies firm‐specific rather than nation‐specific variations within the same industry environment.

[1]  A. Sinclair The Tyranny of a Team Ideology , 1992 .

[2]  Odd Nordhaug,et al.  International human resource management: an environmental perspective , 1992 .

[3]  J. Purcell,et al.  The Europeanization of manufacturing and the decentralization of bargaining: multinational management strategies in the European automobile industry , 1992 .

[4]  Frank Mueller,et al.  Designing Flexible Teamwork: Comparing German and Japanese Approaches. , 1992 .

[5]  M. Safizadeh The Case of Workgroups in Manufacturing Operations , 1991 .

[6]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[7]  Nick Oliver,et al.  ADOPTING JAPANESE-STYLE MANUFACTURING METHODS: A TALE OF TWO (UK) FACTORIES* , 1990 .

[8]  N. Nicholson,et al.  STRATEGY, INNOVATION AND PERFORMANCE , 1990 .

[9]  Jonas Pontusson The Politics of New Technology and Job Redesign: A Comparison of Volo and British Leyland , 1990 .

[10]  David Guest,et al.  Human Resource Management And The American Dream , 1990 .

[11]  H. Terrance Ross,et al.  Teamwork breeds quality at Hearing Technology, Inc , 1990 .

[12]  Lee A. Towe Survey finds employee involvement a priority for necessary innovation , 1989 .

[13]  P. Marginson Employment flexibility in large companies: change and continuity , 1989 .

[14]  Ken Starkey,et al.  Beyond Fordism? strategic choice and labour relations in Ford UK , 1989 .

[15]  U. Jürgens,et al.  Moderne Zeiten in der Automobilfabrik , 1989 .

[16]  THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM BUILDING IN A HIGH‐TECH ENVIRONMENT , 1988 .

[17]  J. Child Information Technology, Organization, and the Response to Strategic Challenges , 1987 .

[18]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Leading Workers to Lead Themselves: The External Leadership of Self-Managing Work Teams. , 1987 .

[19]  Peter Wickens,et al.  The Road to Nissan , 1987 .

[20]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[21]  H. Shaiken,et al.  The Work Process Under More Flexible Production , 1986 .

[22]  P. Beaumont,et al.  Public Sector Industrial Relations: Recent Developments , 1985 .

[23]  W. Werther “Job 1” at Ford: Employee Co‐operation , 1985 .

[24]  Lex Donaldson,et al.  ORGANIZATION DESIGN AND THE LIFE‐CYCLES OF PRODUCTS [1] , 1985 .

[25]  Edward P. M. Gardener A SYSTEMS APPROACH TO BANK PRUDENTIAL MANAGEMENT AND SUPERVISION: THE UTILIZATION OF FEEDFORWARD CONTROL , 1985 .

[26]  R. B. Mckersie,et al.  Strategic Choice and Industrial Relations Theory , 1984 .

[27]  G. Strauss Industrial Relations: Time of Change , 1984 .

[28]  M. Markus,et al.  Success story: The team approach to work restructuring , 1980 .

[29]  T. G. Cummings Self-Regulating Work Groups: A Socio-Technical Synthesis , 1978 .

[30]  J. Child Organizational Structure, Environment and Performance: The Role of Strategic Choice , 1972 .

[31]  A. Gouldner,et al.  Metaphysical Pathos and the Theory of Bureaucracy , 1955, American Political Science Review.