The pole tide and its effect on GRACE time‐variable gravity measurements: Implications for estimates of surface mass variations

Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) provides monthly solutions for the Earth's gravity field in the form of spherical harmonic coefficients. These can be used to infer changes in mass at the Earth's surface. The pole tide (the response of the Earth and oceans to polar motion) causes gravity signals dominated by harmonics of degree 2, order 1. If the pole tide is not removed from GRACE data, it affects the coefficients of those harmonics (C21, S21) and introduces errors when using those coefficients to determine surface mass variations. The pole tide is partially removed by GRACE processing centers before solving for the gravity field. But long-period pole tide signals are not usually included in the GRACE pole tide correction, and so those signals are still present in the GRACE coefficients. We discuss this issue from the standpoint of somebody who uses the GRACE gravity fields to infer changes in surface mass. We arrive at a recommendation for an optimal GRACE pole tide correction. We describe how to modify the C21, S21 coefficients provided by the processing centers, so that they conform with our recommendation. We discuss the size of the pole tide contributions to C21, S21, compared to those of the direct load-induced contributions. As an example, we show how an incompletely removed pole tide can impact GRACE results for the trend in ocean mass. We consider the impact of mantle anelasticity on long-period pole tide corrections and conclude that it is unlikely to affect those corrections by more than 20%.

[1]  A. Paulson,et al.  Reanalysis of ancient eclipse, astronomic and geodetic data: A possible route to resolving the enigma of global sea-level rise , 2006 .

[2]  Mats Nilsson,et al.  Energy exchange and water budget partitioning in a boreal minerogenic mire , 2013 .

[3]  F. Dahlen,et al.  The period and Q of the Chandler wobble , 1981 .

[4]  Matt A. King,et al.  Geodetic vertical velocities affected by recent rapid changes in polar motion , 2014 .

[5]  R. Gross,et al.  An estimate of motion between the spin axis and the hotspots over the past century , 2004 .

[6]  J. Wahr The effects of the atmosphere and oceans on the Earth's wobble — I. Theory , 1982 .

[7]  W. Tad Pfeffer,et al.  Recent contributions of glaciers and ice caps to sea level rise , 2012, Nature.

[8]  F. Bryan,et al.  Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE , 1998 .

[9]  S. Jayne,et al.  A method of inferring changes in deep ocean currents from satellite measurements of time‐variable gravity , 2002 .

[10]  Shin-Chan Han,et al.  Source parameter inversion for recent great earthquakes from a decade‐long observation of global gravity fields , 2013 .

[11]  S. Karato,et al.  Defect microdynamics in minerals and solid state mechanisms of seismic wave attenuation and velocity dispersion in the mantle , 1990 .

[12]  Isabella Velicogna,et al.  Time‐variable gravity observations of ice sheet mass balance: Precision and limitations of the GRACE satellite data , 2013 .

[13]  J. Wahr,et al.  Computations of the viscoelastic response of a 3-D compressible Earth to surface loading: an application to Glacial Isostatic Adjustment in Antarctica and Canada , 2012 .

[14]  D. L. Anderson,et al.  Preliminary reference earth model , 1981 .

[15]  Shailen D. Desai,et al.  Observing the pole tide with satellite altimetry , 2002 .

[16]  D. Chambers,et al.  Ocean bottom pressure seasonal cycles and decadal trends from GRACE Release-05: Ocean circulation implications , 2013 .

[17]  F. Dahlen The Passive Influence of the Oceans upon the Rotation of the Earth , 1976 .

[18]  J. Vondrák,et al.  Astrometric and space‐geodetic observations of polar wander , 1999 .

[19]  W. R. Peltier,et al.  The LAGEOS constraint on deep mantle viscosity: Results from a new normal mode method for the inversion of viscoelastic relaxation spectra , 1985 .

[20]  W. Peltier,et al.  Pleistocene deglaciation and the Earth's rotation: implications for mantle viscosity , 1981 .

[21]  Minkang Cheng,et al.  Variations of the Earth's figure axis from satellite laser ranging and GRACE , 2011 .

[22]  S. Desai,et al.  Constraints on mantle anelasticity from geodetic observations, and implications for the J2 anomaly , 2006 .

[23]  M. Watkins,et al.  The gravity recovery and climate experiment: Mission overview and early results , 2004 .

[24]  Don P. Chambers,et al.  Using ocean bottom pressure from the gravity recovery and climate experiment (GRACE) to estimate transport variability in the southern Indian Ocean , 2015 .