Comparison Method of Biomechanical Analysis of Trans-Tibial Amputee Gait with a Mechanical Test Machine Simulation

Energy-storing-and-returning prosthetic feet are frequently recommended for lower limb amputees. Functional performance and stiffness characteristics are evaluated by state-of-the-art biomechanical testing, while it is common practice for design engineers and researchers to use test machines to measure stiffness. The correlation between user-specific biomechanical measures and machine evaluation has not been thoroughly investigated, and mechanical testing for ramps is limited. In this paper, we propose a novel test method to assess prosthetic foot stiffness properties in the sagittal plane. First, biomechanical data were collected on five trans-tibial users using a variable stiffness prosthetic foot on a split-belt treadmill. Gait trials were performed on level ground and on an incline and a decline of 7.5°. The same prosthetic foot was tested on a roll-over test machine for the three terrains. The sagittal ankle moment and angle were compared for the two test methods. The dorsiflexion moment and angle were similar, while more variability was observed in the plantarflexion results. A good correlation was found for level-ground walking, while decline walking showed the largest differences in the results of the maximum angles. The roll-over test machine is a useful tool to speed up design iterations with a set design goal prior to user testing.

[1]  Murray E Maitland,et al.  What People Want in a Prosthetic Foot: A Focus Group Study , 2016, Journal of prosthetics and orthotics : JPO.

[2]  Sara R. Koehler-McNicholas,et al.  A more compliant prosthetic foot better accommodates added load while walking among Servicemembers with transtibial limb loss. , 2020, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Anne Simmons,et al.  Energy Storage and Return Prostheses: A Review of Mechanical Models. , 2016, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[4]  Variable stiffness foot design and validation. , 2021, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Donald G. Shurr,et al.  Transfemoral Amputee Physiological Requirements: Comparisons Between SACH Foot Walking and Flex-Foot Walking , 1997 .

[6]  Sebastian I. Wolf,et al.  Benefits of an increased prosthetic ankle range of motion for individuals with a trans-tibial amputation walking with a new prosthetic foot. , 2018, Gait & posture.

[7]  Toshiki Kobayashi,et al.  Effect of prosthetic alignment changes on socket reaction moment impulse during walking in transtibial amputees. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  The 3D L.A.S.A.R. – A New Generation of Static Analysis for Optimising Prosthetic and Orthotic Alignment , 2018 .

[9]  Janice J Eng,et al.  A comparison of two prosthetic feet on the multi-joint and multi-plane kinetic gait compensations in individuals with a unilateral trans-tibial amputation. , 2004, Clinical biomechanics.

[10]  S. Wolf,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of ramp ambulation of transtibial amputees with an adaptive ankle foot system. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[11]  Maura E. Eveld,et al.  Subject-specific responses to an adaptive ankle prosthesis during incline walking. , 2019, Journal of biomechanics.

[12]  J. Andrysek Lower-Limb Prosthetic Technologies in the Developing World: A Review of Literature from 1994–2010 , 2010, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[13]  Noor Azuan Abu Osman,et al.  Quantitative analysis of human ankle characteristics at different gait phases and speeds for utilizing in ankle-foot prosthetic design , 2014, Biomedical engineering online.

[15]  Karl E Zelik,et al.  The role of series ankle elasticity in bipedal walking. , 2014, Journal of theoretical biology.

[16]  Kenton Kaufman,et al.  Instantaneous stiffness and hysteresis of dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet , 2017, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[17]  Elizabeth G. Halsne,et al.  The effect of prosthetic foot stiffness on foot-ankle biomechanics and relative foot stiffness perception in people with transtibial amputation. , 2020, Clinical biomechanics.

[18]  Mark Edwards,et al.  Effects of prosthetic foot forefoot flexibility on oxygen cost and subjective preference rankings of unilateral transtibial prosthesis users. , 2010, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[20]  Nerrolyn Ramstrand,et al.  Sagittal plane position of the functional joint centre of prosthetic foot/ankle mechanisms. , 2010, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  Felix Starker,et al.  A Method for Sports Shoe Machinery Endurance Testing: Modification of ISO 22675 Prosthetic Foot Test Machine for Heel-to-toe Running Movement.☆ , 2014 .

[22]  C. Riegger Anatomy of the ankle and foot. , 1988, Physical therapy.

[23]  Jan Andrysek,et al.  Two-dimensional video gait analysis: A systematic review of reliability, validity, and best practice considerations , 2020, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[24]  W. Lee Childers,et al.  Increasing prosthetic foot energy return affects whole-body mechanics during walking on level ground and slopes , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Michael E Hahn,et al.  Trajectory of the center of rotation in non-articulated energy storage and return prosthetic feet. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Helco G van Keeken,et al.  Comparative roll-over analysis of prosthetic feet. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  D Gordon E Robertson,et al.  Design and responses of Butterworth and critically damped digital filters. , 2003, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[29]  Dirk Lefeber,et al.  Prosthetic feet: State-of-the-art review and the importance of mimicking human ankle–foot biomechanics , 2009, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.