Rethinking wastewater characterisation methods for activated sludge systems - a position paper.

Increasingly stringent effluent limits and an expanding scope of model system boundaries beyond activated sludge has led to new modelling objectives and consequently to new and often more detailed modelling concepts. Nearly three decades after the publication of Activated Sludge Model No1 (ASM1), the authors believe it is time to re-evaluate wastewater characterisation procedures and targets. The present position paper gives a brief overview of state-of-the-art methods and discusses newly developed measurement techniques on a conceptual level. Potential future paths are presented including on-line instrumentation, promising measuring techniques, and mathematical solutions to fractionation problems. This is accompanied by a discussion on standardisation needs to increase modelling efficiency in our industry.

[1]  M. Henze Characterization of Wastewater for Modelling of Activated Sludge Processes , 1992 .

[2]  David Jenkins,et al.  A rapid physical-chemical method for the determination of readily biodegradable soluble COD in municipal wastewater , 1993 .

[3]  M. Wentzel,et al.  Batch test for measurement of readily biodegradable COD and active organism concentrations in municipal waste waters , 1995 .

[4]  S. Sözen,et al.  Characterization and COD fractionation of domestic wastewaters. , 1997, Environmental pollution.

[5]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Respirometry in Control of the Activated Sludge Process: Principles , 1998 .

[6]  Characterization of wastewater and activated sludge from European municipal wastewater treatment plants using the NUR test , 1998 .

[7]  Henryk Melcer Full scale experience with biological process models — Calibration issues , 1999 .

[8]  Henri Spanjers,et al.  Direct parameter extraction from respirograms for wastewater and biomass characterization , 1999 .

[9]  Low sludge age and its consequences for metabolisation, storage and adsorption of readily biodegradable substrate (Ss) , 2000 .

[10]  Application of COD fractionation by a new combined technique: comparison of various wastewaters and sources of variability. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Evaluation of an ASM 1 model calibration procedure on a municipal – industrial wastewater treatment plant , 2002 .

[12]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Experience with guidelines for wastewater characterisation in The Netherlands. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  M. Spérandio,et al.  Wastewater COD characterization: biodegradability of physico-chemical fractions. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[14]  K. Gernaey,et al.  A comprehensive model calibration procedure for activated sludge models , 2003 .

[15]  P. Chatellier,et al.  Observed and simulated effect of rain events on the behaviour of an activated sludge plant removing nitrogen , 2003 .

[16]  E. Morgenroth,et al.  Chemical composition associated with different particle size fractions in municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastewaters. , 2004, Chemosphere.

[17]  Ekama Ga,et al.  Modelling inorganic material in activated sludge systems , 2004 .

[18]  Specificity and Potential Applications of the Biochemical Acidogenic Potential Method for the Anaerobic Characterization of Wastewater , 2005, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[19]  E. Morgenroth,et al.  The influence of particle size on microbial hydrolysis of protein particles in activated sludge. , 2006, Water research.

[20]  M de Gracia,et al.  New mathematical procedure for the automatic estimation of influent characteristics in WWTPs. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  David L. Sedlak,et al.  Measurement of dissolved organic nitrogen forms in wastewater effluents: concentrations, size distribution and NDMA formation potential. , 2008, Water research.

[22]  Jurg Keller,et al.  Dynamics and dynamic modelling of H2S production in sewer systems. , 2008, Water research.

[23]  K. Brischke,et al.  A balancing act: the consulting engineers' pragmatic view of process modelling. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  H Steinmetz,et al.  Optimisation potential for a SBR plant based upon integrated modelling for dry and wet weather conditions. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[25]  J B Copp,et al.  Wastewater treatment modelling in practice: a collaborative discussion of the state of the art. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  D. Lamarre,et al.  Biodegradation of the endogenous residue of activated sludge. , 2010, Water research.

[27]  P. Lu,et al.  An integrated system for wastewater COD characterization and a case study. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[28]  S. Gillot,et al.  Biodegradable organic matter in domestic wastewaters: comparison of selected fractionation techniques. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  José Ferrer,et al.  Wastewater COD characterization: analysis of respirometric and physical‐chemical methods for determining biodegradable organic matter fractions , 2010 .

[30]  Dominique Patureau,et al.  A three-compartment model for micropollutants sorption in sludge: methodological approach and insights. , 2010, Water research.

[31]  H. D. Stensel,et al.  WERF Nutrient Challenge investigates limits of nutrient removal technologies. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[32]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  New framework for standardized notation in wastewater treatment modelling. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[33]  B. Smets,et al.  Modeling nitrous oxide production during biological nitrogen removal via nitrification and denitrification: extensions to the general ASM models. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  P. Westerhoff,et al.  Occurrence and treatment of wastewater-derived organic nitrogen. , 2011, Water research.

[35]  M C M van Loosdrecht,et al.  Divergence between respirometry and physicochemical methods in the fractionation of the chemical oxygen demand in municipal wastewater. , 2011, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[36]  J. Mąkinia,et al.  The role of colloidal and particulate organic compounds in denitrification and EBPR occurring in a full-scale activated sludge system. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[37]  J. Choubert,et al.  Concentrations and fate of sugars, proteins and lipids during domestic and agro-industrial aerobic treatment. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[38]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Impact of influent data frequency and model structure on the quality of WWTP model calibration and uncertainty. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[39]  I Nopens,et al.  Critical review of membrane bioreactor models--part 1: biokinetic and filtration models. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[40]  Günter Langergraber,et al.  Guidelines for Using Activated Sludge Models , 2012 .

[41]  A Héduit,et al.  A calibration protocol of a one-dimensional moving bed bioreactor (MBBR) dynamic model for nitrogen removal. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[42]  C Wisniewski,et al.  Modelling of micropollutant removal in biological wastewater treatments: a review. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[43]  L Benedetti,et al.  Modelling micro-pollutant fate in wastewater collection and treatment systems: status and challenges. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[44]  Yves Comeau,et al.  Modelling the degradation of endogenous residue and 'unbiodegradable' influent organic suspended solids to predict sludge production. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.