Safety and Operational Benefits of Variable Speed Limits under Different Traffic Conditions and Driver Compliance Levels

Control of traffic by a variable speed limit (VSL) has been researched for a long time, but there is a lack of consensus on its safety and operational benefits and on the impact of driver compliance. This study provides quantitative evaluations of these benefits and shows the importance of driver compliance with VSLs. VISSIM and the technique of simulated vehicle conflicts (Surrogate Safety Assessment Model) were used in the study. To validate the safety analysis, an attempt was made to correlate the simulated vehicle conflicts with historic crashes. Three scenarios of traffic conditions were considered: heavily congested, lightly congested, and uncongested. Each scenario was further examined under four driver compliance levels: low, medium, high, and very high. The results con-firmed that the VSL had safety and operational benefits for motorway traffic. The system had the highest safety benefits during highly congested traffic conditions, followed by lightly congested conditions, and the least during uncongested conditions. Moreover, the system had the highest operational benefits during lightly congested traffic conditions, little benefit during uncongested conditions, and no benefit during heavily congested conditions. It was also found that the safety benefits of VSL were not at the expense of an increase in travel time. However, these benefits showed significant variations that depended on drivers' level of compliance with the system. The study concludes that the success of the VSL is highly dependent on the level of driver compliance.

[1]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Evaluation of variable speed limits for real-time freeway safety improvement. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  E. van den Hoogen,et al.  Control by variable speed signs: results of the Dutch experiment , 1994 .

[3]  Bruce Hellinga,et al.  Variable Speed Limits: Safety and Operational Impacts of a Candidate Control Strategy for Freeway Applications , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Craig Lyon,et al.  Relation of Flow, Speed, and Density of Urban Freeways to Functional Form of a Safety Performance Function , 2011 .

[5]  E. Kwon,et al.  Development and Field Evaluation of Variable Advisory Speed Limit System for Work Zones , 2007 .

[6]  Larry Head,et al.  Surrogate Safety Measures from Traffic Simulation Models , 2003 .

[7]  Carlos Sun,et al.  Microsimulation Calibration Using Speed-Flow Relationships , 2008 .

[8]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Testing Effects of Warning Messages and Variable Speed Limits on Driver Behavior Using Driving Simulator , 2008 .

[9]  Mark D Robinson,et al.  EXAMPLES OF VARIABLE SPEED LIMIT APPLICATIONS , 2000 .

[10]  Chris Lee,et al.  Evaluation of Variable Speed Limits to Improve Traffic Safety , 2006 .

[11]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Crash Prediction Models for Intersections on Rural Multilane Highways , 2007 .

[12]  Bhagwant Persaud,et al.  Calibration and Transferability of Accident Prediction Models for Urban Intersections , 2002 .

[13]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report , 2008 .

[14]  Fedel Frank Saccomanno,et al.  Assessing Safety Benefits of Variable Speed Limits , 2004 .

[15]  Alfonso Montella,et al.  Crash Prediction Models for Rural Motorways , 2008 .

[16]  Tarek Sayed,et al.  SURROGATE MEASURES OF SAFETY , 2009 .

[17]  Kaan Ozbay,et al.  Derivation and Validation of New Simulation-Based Surrogate Safety Measure , 2008 .

[18]  Iisakki Kosonen,et al.  The Potential of Micro-Simulation Modelling in Relation to Traffic Safety Assessment , 2000 .

[19]  Ruben Corthout,et al.  Assessment of Variable Speed Limits from the drivers' perspective , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[20]  Luis de Picado Santos,et al.  The Need for Transition from Macroscopic to Microscopic Traffic Management Schemes to Improve Safety and Mobility , 2012 .

[21]  Jj Park,et al.  The Effects of Automated Speed Enforcement Systems on Traffic-Flow Characteristics and Accidents in Korea , 2003 .

[22]  Michael D Fontaine,et al.  Interaction between System Design and Operations of Variable Speed Limit Systems in Work Zones , 2010 .

[23]  Peter Holm,et al.  Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume IV: Guidelines for Applying CORSIM Microsimulation Modeling Software , 2007 .

[24]  Albania Nissan,et al.  Evaluation of the Impact of Advisory Variable Speed Limits on Motorway Capacity and Level of Service , 2011 .

[25]  M M Minderhoud,et al.  Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  C. Fuhs,et al.  Active Traffic Management: The Next Step in Congestion Management , 2007 .

[27]  Bruce Hellinga,et al.  Impact of Driver Compliance on the Safety and Operational Impacts of Freeway Variable Speed Limit Systems , 2011 .

[28]  M. Papageorgiou,et al.  Effects of Variable Speed Limits on Motorway Traffic Flow , 2008 .

[29]  Mohamed Abdel-Aty,et al.  Applying Variable Speed Limits and the Potential for Crash Migration , 2006 .

[30]  Mitsuru Saito,et al.  Variable Speed Limit Signs: Effects on Speed and Speed Variation in Work Zones , 2009 .