Detection of primary melanoma in individuals at extreme high risk: a prospective 5-year follow-up study.

IMPORTANCE The clinical phenotype and certain predisposing genetic mutations that confer increased melanoma risk are established; however, no consensus exists regarding optimal screening for such individuals. Early identification remains the most important intervention in reducing melanoma mortality. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of full-body examinations every 6 months supported by dermoscopy and total-body photography (TBP) on all patients and sequential digital dermoscopy imaging (SDDI), when indicated, on detecting primary melanoma in an extreme-risk population. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Prospective observational study from February 2006 to February 2011, with patients recruited from Sydney Melanoma Diagnostic Centre and Melanoma Institute Australia who had a history of invasive melanoma and dysplastic nevus syndrome, history of invasive melanoma and at least 3 first-degree or second-degree relatives with prior melanoma, history of at least 2 primary invasive melanomas, or a CDKN2A or CDK4 gene mutation. EXPOSURES Six-month full-body examination compared with TBP. For equivocal lesions, SDDI short term (approximately 3 months) or long term (≥6 months), following established criteria, was performed. Atypical lesions were excised. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES New primary melanoma numbers, characteristics, and cumulative incidence in each patient subgroup; effect of diagnostic aids on new melanoma identification. RESULTS In 311 patients with a median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up of 3.5 (2.4-4.2) years, 75 primary melanomas were detected, 14 at baseline visit. Median (IQR) Breslow thickness of postbaseline incident melanomas was in situ (in situ to 0.60 mm). Thirty-eight percent were detected using TBP and 39% with SDDI. Five melanomas were greater than 1 mm Breslow thickness, 3 of which were histologically desmoplastic; the other 2 had nodular components. The benign to malignant excision ratio was 1.6:1 for all lesions excised and 4.4:1 for melanocytic lesions. Cumulative risk of developing a novel primary melanoma was 12.7% by year 2, with new primary melanoma incidence during the final 3 years of follow-up half of that observed during the first 2 years (incidence density ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.25-0.74]; P = .002). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Monitoring patients at extreme risk with TBP and SDDI assisted with early diagnosis of primary melanoma. Hypervigilance for difficult-to-detect thick melanoma subtypes is crucial.

[1]  Suephy C. Chen,et al.  Utilization and rationale for the implementation of total body (digital) photography as an adjunct screening measure for melanoma , 2010, Melanoma research.

[2]  A. Halpern,et al.  Clinicopathological features of and risk factors for multiple primary melanomas. , 2005, JAMA.

[3]  M. Mihm,et al.  Multiple primary cutaneous melanomas , 1992, Cancer.

[4]  M Schemper,et al.  A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. , 1996, Controlled clinical trials.

[5]  P. Boyle,et al.  Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: II. Sun exposure. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[6]  P. Boyle,et al.  Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[7]  C Legrand,et al.  Availability of digital dermoscopy in daily practice dramatically reduces the number of excised melanocytic lesions: results from an observational study , 2012, The British journal of dermatology.

[8]  S. Menzies,et al.  Variables predicting change in benign melanocytic nevi undergoing short-term dermoscopic imaging. , 2011, Archives of dermatology.

[9]  K. Czene,et al.  Familial and attributable risks in cutaneous melanoma: effects of proband and age. , 2003, The Journal of investigative dermatology.

[10]  J. Bowling,et al.  Dermoscopic evaluation of nodular melanoma. , 2013, JAMA dermatology.

[11]  S. Menzies,et al.  Identification of clinically featureless incipient melanoma using sequential dermoscopy imaging. , 2006, Archives of dermatology.

[12]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[13]  B. Thiers,et al.  Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting , 2009 .

[14]  P. Baade,et al.  Changes in the site distribution of common melanoma subtypes in Queensland, Australia over time: implications for public health campaigns , 2013, The British journal of dermatology.

[15]  C. Mathers,et al.  Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 , 2010, International journal of cancer.

[16]  P. Diggle Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 1995 .

[17]  C. Slingluff,et al.  Multiple primary melanoma: incidence and risk factors in 283 patients. , 1993, Surgery.

[18]  J. Malvehy,et al.  Characterization of 1152 lesions excised over 10 years using total-body photography and digital dermatoscopy in the surveillance of patients at high risk for melanoma. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[19]  S. Puig,et al.  Features associated with germline CDKN2A mutations: a GenoMEL study of melanoma-prone families from three continents , 2006, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[20]  A. Kopf,et al.  Detection of melanomas in patients followed up with total cutaneous examinations, total cutaneous photography, and dermoscopy. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[21]  M. Mihm,et al.  Desmoplastic malignant melanoma: diagnosis of early clinical lesions. , 1999, Human pathology.

[22]  Josep Malvehy,et al.  Benefits of total body photography and digital dermatoscopy ("two-step method of digital follow-up") in the early diagnosis of melanoma in patients at high risk for melanoma. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[23]  S. Menzies,et al.  Assessment of the optimal interval for and sensitivity of short-term sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring for the diagnosis of melanoma. , 2008, Archives of dermatology.

[24]  A. Halpern Total body skin imaging as an aid to melanoma detection. , 2003, Seminars in cutaneous medicine and surgery.

[25]  M. Tucker,et al.  Increased risk of second primary cancers after a diagnosis of melanoma. , 2010, Archives of dermatology.

[26]  S. Menzies,et al.  Enhanced survival in patients with multiple primary melanoma. , 2003, Archives of dermatology.

[27]  H. Kittler,et al.  Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital epiluminescence microscopy: patterns of modifications observed in early melanoma, atypical nevi, and common nevi. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[28]  Michael P Schön,et al.  Seven-point checklist for dermatoscopy: performance during 10 years of prospective surveillance of patients at increased melanoma risk. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology.

[29]  P. Boyle,et al.  Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: III. Family history, actinic damage and phenotypic factors. , 2005, European journal of cancer.

[30]  J. Malvehy,et al.  Follow-up of melanocytic skin lesions with digital total-body photography and digital dermoscopy: a two-step method. , 2002, Clinics in dermatology.

[31]  S. Menzies,et al.  Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. , 2001, Archives of dermatology.