A prediction model of layer geometrical size in wire and arc additive manufacture using response surface methodology

Wire and arc additive manufacture has received much concern for its unique advantages in fabrication of large size near net shape components. But the flexibility nature of free arc and time-varying environmental conditions synergistically make shaping path complicated and mutable. In this paper, central composite rotatable experimental design was applied to clarify the mutual relation between input variables (peak current, wire feed speed, and travel speed) and their responses (bead height and width). Moreover, a predicting model was developed, and the validity of the model has been checked by analysis of variance (ANOVA) technique. By using the developed mathematical model, the bead height and width of a single layer are predicted with 95 % confidence level according to the pre-set process parameters. Vice versa, control strategies are proposed to keep the subsequent layer geometrical size unchanged from the former one. A set of process parameters with a desirability of 0.971 is advised basing on the model when the bead height is expected to be 2 mm and the optimum technological parameters, Ip = 160A, vT = 0.23 m/min, vw = 4.91 m/min, have been verified by the confirmatory experiment.

[1]  Stewart Williams,et al.  Morphology investigation on direct current pulsed gas tungsten arc welded additive layer manufactured Ti6Al4V alloy , 2011 .

[2]  Yasuyoshi Kaneko,et al.  Effect of power source characteristic on CO2 short circuiting arc welding , 2005 .

[3]  N. Murugan,et al.  Effect of submerged arc process variables on dilution and bead geometry in single wire surfacing , 1993 .

[4]  V. C. Venkatesh,et al.  Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of coated carbide tools when turning AISI 1045 steel , 2004 .

[5]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Rapid prototyping of 4043 Al-alloy parts by VP-GTAW , 2004 .

[6]  Radovan Kovacevic,et al.  Rapid prototyping of 5356-aluminum alloy based on variable polarity gas tungsten arc welding: process control and microstructure , 2002 .

[7]  Imtiaz Ahmed Choudhury,et al.  Surface roughness prediction in the turning of high-strength steel by factorial design of experiments , 1997 .

[8]  Tulasi Satyanarayana,et al.  Statistical optimization of the medium components by response surface methodology to enhance phytase production by Pichia anomala , 2002 .

[9]  Helen Lockett,et al.  Fabrication of geometrical features using wire and arc additive manufacture , 2012 .

[10]  B. Lee,et al.  Modeling the surface roughness and cutting force for turning , 2001 .

[11]  Omer Van der Biest,et al.  Wire based additive layer manufacturing: Comparison of microstructure and mechanical properties of Ti–6Al–4V components fabricated by laser-beam deposition and shaped metal deposition , 2011 .