The paper deals with a discrete differential dynamic programming type of problem. It is an optimal control problem where an external disturbance is controlled over the time horizon by a control force constituted with the well-known convolution approach. The paper presents a simple and novel idea to achieve an optimally controlled response when a linear system is subjected to an arbitrary external disturbance. The proposed approach uses the convolution concept and states that if a control method can be established to restore a unit external disturbance, then the convolution integral can be applied to generate an overall control strategy to control the system when it is subjected to an arbitrary external disturbance. In spite of its simplicity, such a strategy has not been encountered in the literature. The only requirement for this method to be useful is to obtain an optimal control strategy to suppress the vibration of the system when it is subjected to unit response disturbance. To accomplish this, a method from classical optimal control theory such as linear quadratic regulator (LQR) that involves solving the Riccati equation of the associated system can be used. However, genetic algorithm (GA) can be adopted as an alternative way to obtain an optimal control strategy against impulse input. As any arbitrary excitation can be divided into impulses, the convolution concept will constitute the overall optimal control strategy for any arbitrary excitation with simply shifting, scaling and summation (or integration) of the GA-optimized control strategy for each impulse of the arbitrary excitation. The proposed method can be used for real time control applications. Once the control strategy for the impulse disturbance is established, the results can then be used at each time step when online control is performed. Computer simulations were carried out to control the response of a quarter-vehicle active suspension system using the proposed method. The obtained results were compared to those of linear quadratic regulator (LQR) and passive suspension applications. The overall results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method for active suspension systems, especially in suppressing the vehicle body displacement when compared to both the LQR based and passive systems. Furthermore, such a control system proves to be simpler requiring less information to process, which is crucial for real-time applications.
[1]
Seref Naci Engin,et al.
A Robust Single Input Adaptive Sliding Mode Fuzzy Logic Controller for Automotive Active Suspension System
,
2005,
FSKD.
[2]
Toshio Yoshimura,et al.
Pneumatic active suspension system for a one-wheel car model using fuzzy reasoning and a disturbance observer
,
2004,
Journal of Zhejiang University. Science.
[3]
G. Usai,et al.
An optimal tandem active-passive suspension system for road vehicles with minimum power consumption
,
1991
.
[4]
Javad Marzbanrad,et al.
Stochastic optimal preview control of a vehicle suspension
,
2004
.
[5]
A. R. M. Noton.
Introduction to Variational Methods in Control Engineering
,
1965
.
[6]
S. C. Southward,et al.
Active Control of Noise and Vibration
,
1996
.
[7]
David E. Goldberg,et al.
Genetic Algorithms in Search Optimization and Machine Learning
,
1988
.
[8]
R. A. Williams,et al.
Automotive active suspensions Part 2: Practical considerations
,
1997
.
[9]
E. M. Elbeheiry,et al.
OPTIMAL CONTROL OF VEHICLE RANDOM VIBRATION WITH CONSTRAINED SUSPENSION DEFLECTION
,
1996
.
[10]
Huei Peng,et al.
Adaptive robust force control for vehicle active suspensions.
,
2004
.
[11]
George M. Siouris,et al.
An Engineering Approach to Optimal Control and Estimation Theory
,
1996
.
[12]
R. A. Williams.
Automotive active suspensions Part 1: Basic principles
,
1997
.
[13]
D. Naidu,et al.
Optimal Control Systems
,
2018
.
[14]
A. Ravindran,et al.
Engineering Optimization: Methods and Applications
,
2006
.
[15]
Melanie Mitchell,et al.
An introduction to genetic algorithms
,
1996
.
[16]
Youngjin Park,et al.
STOCHASTIC OPTIMAL PREVIEW CONTROL OF AN ACTIVE VEHICLE SUSPENSION
,
1999
.
[17]
D. Hrovat,et al.
Survey of Advanced Suspension Developments and Related Optimal Control Applications,
,
1997,
Autom..
[18]
Paul I. Ro,et al.
Effect of the suspension structure on equivalent suspension parameters
,
1999
.
[19]
Huei Peng,et al.
Adaptive robust control for active suspensions
,
1999,
Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).