Measuring Depth of Invasion in Early Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Tongue: Positive Deep Margin, Extratumoral Perineural Invasion, and Other Challenges

The 8th edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC 8th) staging manual incorporated depth of invasion (DOI) into pT stage of oral cavity cancer. The aim of this study was to characterize several histological findings that may complicate measurement of DOI in early conventional squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) of the oral tongue: (1) lack of or minimal residual carcinoma following biopsy; (2) positive deep margin; (3) extratumoral perineural invasion (PNI); and (4) lymphatic or vascular invasion. Conventional SCC of the oral tongue (n = 407) with the largest dimension of ≤ 4 cm and with a negative elective cervical lymph node dissection (pN0) were reviewed. A clear plastic ruler was used to measure DOI by dropping a “plumb line” to the deepest point of the invasive tumor from the level of the basement membrane of the normal mucosa closest to the invasive tumor. Examples of identifying  reference point on the mucosal surface of oral tongue from which to measure the DOI are illustrated. In the experience of one contributing institution, the residual carcinoma was absent in 14.2% of glossectomies (34/239), while in 4.8% of cases (10/205) there was only minimal residual carcinoma. In 11.5% (21/183) of pT2 cases the deep margin was positive and thus DOI and pT may be underestimated. Of all cases with PNI, extratumoral PNI was identified in 23.1% (31/134) of cases, but represented the deepest point of invasion in only two cases. In one case, lymphatic invasion represented the deepest point of invasion and could have led to upstaging from pT1 to pT2. In conclusion, DOI measurement for SCC of the oral tongue may require re-examination of the diagnostic biopsy in up to 20% of cases due to the absence or only minimal residual carcinoma in glossectomy specimens. In 11.5% of apparently pT2 cases, DOI may be underestimated due to the positive deep margin. Rarely, extratumoral PNI or lymphatic invasion may be the deepest point of invasion. Overall, two issues (absent or minimal residual disease and positive deep margin) may confound DOI measurement in early SCCs of oral tongue.

[1]  G. Lockwood,et al.  Predictive value of tumor thickness for cervical lymph‐node involvement in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity , 2009, Cancer.

[2]  W. Wei,et al.  A comparison of the prognostic significance of tumor diameter, length, width, thickness, area, volume, and clinicopathological features of oral tongue carcinoma. , 2000, American journal of surgery.

[3]  Simion I. Chiosea,et al.  Improving margin revision: Characterization of tumor bed margins in early oral tongue cancer. , 2017, Oral Oncology.

[4]  N. Lee,et al.  Long Term Regional Control and Survival in Patients with “Low Risk” Early Stage Oral Tongue Cancer Managed by Partial Glossectomy and Neck Dissection without Postoperative Radiation: The Importance of Depth of Invasion , 2011 .

[5]  J. Shah,et al.  Long‐term regional control and survival in patients with “low‐risk,” early stage oral tongue cancer managed by partial glossectomy and neck dissection without postoperative radiation , 2013, Cancer.

[6]  N. Al-Rajhi,et al.  Early stage carcinoma of oral tongue: prognostic factors for local control and survival. , 2000, Oral oncology.

[7]  Jonathan R. Clark,et al.  Tumor thickness versus depth of invasion - Analysis of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for oral cancer. , 2017, Oral oncology.

[8]  K. Keum,et al.  Clinical outcomes for T1-2N0-1 oral tongue cancer patients underwent surgery with and without postoperative radiotherapy , 2010, Radiation oncology.

[9]  Jonathan R. Clark,et al.  Primary tumor staging for oral cancer and a proposed modification incorporating depth of invasion: an international multicenter retrospective study. , 2014, JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery.

[10]  R. de Bree,et al.  Intraoral ultrasonography to measure tumor thickness of oral cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2018, Oral oncology.

[11]  Wang Ling,et al.  Survival pattern and prognostic factors of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue: a retrospective analysis of 210 cases. , 2013, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[12]  D. Elashoff,et al.  A novel classification system for perineural invasion in noncutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: histologic subcategories and patient outcomes. , 2012, American journal of otolaryngology.

[13]  Simion I. Chiosea,et al.  Early Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Sampling of Margins From Tumor Bed and Worse Local Control. , 2015, JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery.

[14]  Brian O'Sullivan,et al.  Head and neck cancers—major changes in the American Joint Committee on cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[15]  Simion I. Chiosea,et al.  Early squamous cell carcinoma of the oral tongue: comparing margins obtained from the glossectomy specimen to margins from the tumor bed. , 2013, Oral oncology.