Local and regional mechanical characterisation of a collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold using high-resolution finite element analysis.

Artificial tissue growth requires cells to proliferate and differentiate within the host scaffold. As cell function is governed by mechano-sensitive selection, tissue type is influenced by the microscopic forces exposed to the cells, which is a product of macroscopically straining the scaffold. Accordingly, the microscopic strain environment within a CG scaffold is offered here. Using muCT to characterise CG scaffold architecture, two high-resolution 3D FE models were used to predict the deformation mechanics. While also providing an analysis of region-specific features, such as relative density, pore diameters and microstructural elastic stability, the deformation patterns afforded strains to be inferred for seeded cells. The results indicate a regional dependence, in terms of architectural and mechanical properties. Specifically, the peripheral regions demonstrated the lowest volume fraction, the highest stress concentrations and the greatest potential for elastic instability. Conversely, the mid-region exhibited the most homogeneous environment. Based on the proviso of mechano-sensitive proliferation and differentiation, the findings suggest cell function will vary between CG scaffold regions. Further work should investigate the possibility of improving the fabrication process in order to deliver a construct in line with the mid-region, or alternatively, isolation of the mid-region may prove beneficial for cell culturing.

[1]  C B Sledge,et al.  Matrix collagen type and pore size influence behaviour of seeded canine chondrocytes. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[2]  H. Petite,et al.  Use of diphenylphosphorylazide for cross-linking collagen-based biomaterials. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[3]  W. E. Warren,et al.  Linear Elastic Behavior of a Low-Density Kelvin Foam With Open Cells , 1997 .

[4]  David P. Fyhrie,et al.  The impact of boundary conditions and mesh size on the accuracy of cancellous bone tissue modulus determination using large-scale finite-element modeling , 1999 .

[5]  Christian Jungreuthmayer,et al.  A comparative study of shear stresses in collagen-glycosaminoglycan and calcium phosphate scaffolds in bone tissue-engineering bioreactors. , 2009, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[6]  Ioannis V. Yannas,et al.  Tissue and organ regeneration in adults , 2001 .

[7]  C. Jungreuthmayer,et al.  Deformation simulation of cells seeded on a collagen-GAG scaffold in a flow perfusion bioreactor using a sequential 3D CFD-elastostatics model. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[8]  Ajit K. Roy,et al.  Micromechanics model for three-dimensional open-cell foams using a tetrakaidecahedral unit cell and Castigliano's second theorem , 2003 .

[9]  Helmut J. Böhm,et al.  A Short Introduction to Continuum Micromechanics , 2004 .

[10]  L. Gibson,et al.  Degradation of a collagen-chondroitin-6-sulfate matrix by collagenase and by chondroitinase. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[11]  M. Spector,et al.  Tendon cell contraction of collagen-GAG matrices in vitro: effect of cross-linking. , 2000, Biomaterials.

[12]  Edward Y Lee,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of a model extracellular matrix that induces partial regeneration of adult mammalian skin. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Y. Pek,et al.  Micromechanics of fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix. , 2001, Experimental cell research.

[14]  F. O'Brien,et al.  Osteoblast activity on collagen-GAG scaffolds is affected by collagen and GAG concentrations. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[15]  I. Yannas,et al.  Peripheral nerve regeneration. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[16]  L. Gibson,et al.  A new technique for calculating individual dermal fibroblast contractile forces generated within collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[17]  L. Gibson,et al.  Fibroblast contractile force is independent of the stiffness which resists the contraction. , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[18]  L. Gibson Biomechanics of cellular solids. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  S. Boyce,et al.  EDC cross-linking improves skin substitute strength and stability. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  P. Prendergast,et al.  Gene expression by marrow stromal cells in a porous collagen–glycosaminoglycan scaffold is affected by pore size and mechanical stimulation , 2008, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[21]  Douglas A Lauffenburger,et al.  Microarchitecture of three-dimensional scaffolds influences cell migration behavior via junction interactions. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[22]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  The effects of cross-linking of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds on compressive stiffness, chondrocyte-mediated contraction, proliferation and biosynthesis. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[23]  L. Gibson,et al.  Fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[24]  J. Kinney,et al.  Numerical errors and uncertainties in finite-element modeling of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  D Lacroix,et al.  A finite element study of mechanical stimuli in scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[26]  Josep A Planell,et al.  Micro-finite element models of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[27]  Patrick J. Prendergast,et al.  Regulatory Effects of Mechanical Strain on the Chondrogenic Differentiation of MSCs in a Collagen-GAG Scaffold: Experimental and Computational Analysis , 2008, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[28]  I. Yannas,et al.  Peripheral nerve regeneration. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[29]  Roger Zauel,et al.  3-D computational modeling of media flow through scaffolds in a perfusion bioreactor. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[30]  J. Czernuszka,et al.  Development of specific collagen scaffolds to support the osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[31]  Gareth Leng,et al.  Pulsatility in Neuroendocrine Systems , 1988 .

[32]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  Design and validation of a dynamic flow perfusion bioreactor for use with compliant tissue engineering scaffolds. , 2008, Journal of biotechnology.

[33]  F. O'Brien,et al.  Heterogeneous linear elastic trabecular bone modelling using micro-CT attenuation data and experimentally measured heterogeneous tissue properties. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[34]  L. Gibson,et al.  Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds. , 2007, Acta biomaterialia.

[35]  S. Hollister,et al.  Optimal design and fabrication of scaffolds to mimic tissue properties and satisfy biological constraints. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[36]  M. Spector,et al.  Collagen-GAG Substrate Enhances the Quality of Nerve Regeneration through Collagen Tubes up to Level of Autograft , 1998, Experimental Neurology.

[37]  Stefan Scheiner,et al.  Micromechanics of bone tissue-engineering scaffolds, based on resolution error-cleared computer tomography. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[38]  E. J. Miller,et al.  Effect of physical crosslinking methods on collagen-fiber durability in proteolytic solutions. , 1996, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[39]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Introduction and evaluation of a gray-value voxel conversion technique. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[40]  M. Spector,et al.  Effects of cross-linking type II collagen-GAG scaffolds on chondrogenesis in vitro: dynamic pore reduction promotes cartilage formation. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[41]  A. Ignatiusa,et al.  Tissue engineering of bone : effects of mechanical strain on osteoblastic cells in type I collagen matrices , 2004 .

[42]  Fergal J O'Brien,et al.  Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[43]  Rik Huiskes,et al.  Corroboration of mechanoregulatory algorithms for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: comparison with in vivo results , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[44]  N. Abdul-Malak,et al.  Mouse fibroblasts in long-term culture within collagen three-dimensional scaffolds: influence of crosslinking with diphenylphosphorylazide on matrix reorganization, growth, and biosynthetic and proteolytic activities. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[45]  F. O'Brien,et al.  The effect of dehydrothermal treatment on the mechanical and structural properties of collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[46]  P. Prendergast,et al.  A finite element prediction of strain on cells in a highly porous collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffold. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[47]  Jacques Comiti,et al.  Experimental characterization of flow regimes in various porous media — III: limit of Darcy's or creeping flow regime for Newtonian and purely viscous non-Newtonian fluids , 2000 .

[48]  L. Gibson,et al.  The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[49]  A. Jayakrishnan,et al.  Glutaraldehyde cross-linked chitosan microspheres as a long acting biodegradable drug delivery vehicle: studies on the in vitro release of mitoxantrone and in vivo degradation of microspheres in rat muscle. , 1995, Biomaterials.