Transformations of Responsibility in the Age of Automation: Being Answerable to Human and Non-Human Others

Especially in the realm of technology, big data, and new media it is questionable if our traditional understanding of responsibility is able to face current challenges—mostly due to its restricted focus on the autonomous, self-sufficient, individual human being as the genuine responsible agent. The possibility of ascribing responsibility to artificial systems or in cases in which we cannot reduce responsibility to a limited and clearly defined group of responsible persons has recently been challenged. In such cases, our conventional methods of identifying individual human agents as the solely feasible responsible agents—or as other important functions within the relational setup of the traditional concept of responsibility such as the addressee and the authority—frequently fail. We need to question and move beyond a traditional understanding of responsibility in order to update it for these and further challenges.

[1]  R. Azzarello,et al.  What Is Posthumanism , 2010 .

[2]  Patrick Lin Why Ethics Matters for Autonomous Cars , 2016 .

[3]  N Shaw,et al.  Who is responsible? , 1998, SAAD digest.

[4]  L. Heidbrink Definitionen und Voraussetzungen der Verantwortung , 2017 .

[5]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Virtual moral agency, virtual moral responsibility: on the moral significance of the appearance, perception, and performance of artificial agents , 2009, AI & SOCIETY.

[6]  K. Toffoletti The Posthuman , 2014 .

[7]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Responsibility and the Moral Phenomenology of Using Self-Driving Cars , 2016, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[8]  Julius Schälike Verantwortung, Freiheit und Wille , 2017 .

[9]  Janina Sombetzki Verantwortung als Begriff, Fähigkeit, Aufgabe , 2014 .

[10]  Gary Watson,et al.  Two Faces of Responsibility , 1996 .

[11]  C. Allen,et al.  Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right from Wrong , 2008 .

[12]  L. Floridi Faultless responsibility: on the nature and allocation of moral responsibility for distributed moral actions , 2016, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[13]  Bruno Latour,et al.  Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy , 1999 .

[14]  Martha Craven Nussbaum,et al.  Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership , 2006 .

[15]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the Morality of Artificial Agents , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[16]  C. Langbehn Verantwortung, Identität und Autonomie , 2017 .

[17]  R. Jay Wallace,et al.  Responsibility and the moral sentiments , 1997 .

[18]  Tom L. Beauchamp,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. , 2011 .

[19]  M. Maring,et al.  Deskriptive und normative Zuschreibungen von Verantwortung , 1992 .

[20]  R. Bernstein,et al.  Evil and the temptation of theodicy , 2002 .

[21]  B. Latour We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[22]  S. Whitfield Frontiers of justice , 2014 .

[23]  B. Williams,et al.  Responsibility , 2016, The Journal of Ethics.

[24]  D. Degrazia,et al.  Taking Animals Seriously-Mental life and moral status , 1996 .

[25]  M. Gerber Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy , 2005 .

[26]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Criminals or Patients? Towards a Tragic Conception of Moral and Legal Responsibility , 2010 .

[27]  A. Lingis,et al.  Totality and infinity : an essay on exteriority , 1969 .

[28]  R. Ingarden Über die Verantwortung : ihre ontischen Fundamente , 1970 .

[29]  R. Valerie,et al.  Donaldson, Sue und Kymlicka, Will: Zoopolis. Eine politische Theorie der Tierrechte. Berlin: Suhrkamp 2013. 608 Seiten. (978-3-518-58600-6). , 2015 .

[30]  J. B. Callicott,et al.  The Case for Animal Rights , 1985 .

[31]  David DeGrazia,et al.  Taking animals seriously , 1996 .

[32]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Facing Animals: A Relational, Other-Oriented Approach to Moral Standing , 2014 .

[33]  Garrath Williams Verantwortung, Rationalität und Urteil , 2017 .

[34]  Carl I. Cohen,et al.  The case for the use of animals in biomedical research. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.