A novel protocol for producing low-abundance targets to characterize the sensitivity limits of ignitable liquid detection canines

Abstract Ignitable liquid detection canines have an extraordinarily sensitive sense of smell. Previous studies estimating canine sensitivity to ignitable liquids have been unable to demonstrate a level below which canines will not indicate ignitable presence. Forensic laboratories provide corroborating evidence and explain reasons for canine indications. Laboratories provide protection against false-positives and greater context for the exhibit contents to both investigators and the courts. However, the methods routinely used in forensic laboratories lack the sensitivity required to match canine sensitivity estimates, leading to frustration when canines provide a strong indication, but the laboratory findings are negative. In order to develop a laboratory method that can match the sensitivity of canines to trace ignitable liquids, an estimation of canine sensitivity is required. We present a protocol for producing extremely clean, porous tile substrates, and a scheme for quantitatively producing target samples with any desired abundance by using a solvent that does not elicit a response from the canines. Search experiments with two canine-handler teams validate the methods and provide the first estimate of the ignitable liquid detection canine sensitivity limit for gasoline: both canines repeatedly located gasoline at 5 pL but provided no indication at any level ≤3 pL. The protocol allows standardization of substrates and targets for canine olfactory testing, while the estimated canine sensitivity to gasoline provides a preliminary target for forensic laboratories performing confirmatory analysis on exhibits selected by ignitable liquid detection canines.

[1]  D M Gialamas Enhancement of fire scene investigations using accelerant detection canines. , 1996, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[2]  T. Walles,et al.  Canine scent detection in the diagnosis of lung cancer: revisiting a puzzling phenomenon , 2011, European Respiratory Journal.

[3]  P. Sandercock A survey of fire debris casework in Canada, 2011–2016 , 2018 .

[4]  Vytenis Babrauskas,et al.  The evaluation of the extent of transporting or "tracking" an identifiable ignitable liquid (gasoline) throughout fire scenes during the investigative process. , 2004, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  J. D. DeHaan,et al.  Canine accelerant detectors and problems with carpet pyrolysis products , 1997 .

[6]  J. Suarez,et al.  Naturalistic quantification of canine olfactory sensitivity , 2006 .

[7]  C. R. Midkiff,et al.  UNCONFIRMED CANINE ACCELERANT DETECTION : A RELIABILITY ISSUE IN COURT , 1998 .

[8]  M. Mcculloch,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Canine Scent Detection in Early- and Late-Stage Lung and Breast Cancers , 2006, Integrative cancer therapies.

[9]  J. Sparks,et al.  Effect of background interference on accelerant detection by canines. , 1996, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  Ta-Hsuan Ong,et al.  Use of Mass Spectrometric Vapor Analysis To Improve Canine Explosive Detection Efficiency. , 2017, Analytical chemistry.

[11]  L. M. Blumberg,et al.  Optimal heating rate in gas chromatography , 2000 .

[12]  Reta Tindall,et al.  An Evaluation of 42 Accelerant Detection Canine Teams , 1995 .

[13]  Jose R. Almirall,et al.  Analysis and interpretation of fire scene evidence , 2004 .

[14]  John P. Jackowski The Incidence of Ignitable Liquid Residues in Fire Debris as Determined by a Sensitive and Comprehensive Analytical Scheme , 1997 .

[15]  R. J. Abel,et al.  Modern Instrumental Limits of Identification of Ignitable Liquids in Forensic Fire Debris Analysis , 2018, Separations.

[16]  Vytenis Babrauskas Ignition Handbook: Principles and Applications to Fire Safety Engineering, Fire Investigation, Risk Management and Forensic Science , 2003 .

[17]  Nathaniel J. Hall,et al.  Odor mixture training enhances dogs' olfactory detection of Home-Made Explosive precursors , 2018, Heliyon.

[18]  N. Mackintosh Abstraction and discrimination. , 2000 .

[19]  Bruce Ottley Beyond the Crime Laboratory: The Admissibility of Unconfirmed Forensic Evidence in Arson Cases, 36 New Eng. J. on Crim. & Civ. Confinement 263 (2010). , 2010 .

[20]  M. Klee,et al.  Theoretical and practical aspects of fast gas chromatography and method translation. , 2002, Journal of chromatographic science.

[21]  D. Mills,et al.  Canine Olfactory Thresholds to Amyl Acetate in a Biomedical Detection Scenario , 2019, Front. Vet. Sci..

[22]  M. Billard,et al.  Evaluation of canines for accelerant detection at fire scenes. , 1994, Journal of forensic sciences.