Task conflict effect in task switching

A part of action preparation is deciding what the relevant task is. This task-decision process is conceptually separate from response selection. To show this, the authors manipulated task conflict in a spatial task-switching paradigm, using conflict stimuli that appeared during trials with univalent targets (affording 1 task). The conflict stimuli afforded task identity because they were used as task cues with bivalent targets (affording 2 tasks) that were intermixed with the univalent targets. Thus, for univalent targets, irrelevant stimuli either caused low task conflict or high task conflict. In three experiments, the authors found poorer performance in high task conflict trials than in low task conflict trials. Task conflict was introduced during target appearance (Experiment 1) or task preparation (Experiments 2 and 3). In the latter case, the task conflict effect decreased with increasing task preparation time showing that task preparation involves task decision.

[1]  I Biederman,et al.  Human performance in contingent information-processing tasks. , 1972, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  R. Davidson,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV , 1976 .

[3]  I. Biederman,et al.  Mental set and mental shift revisited , 1976 .

[4]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[5]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action , 1986 .

[6]  Robin R. Vallacher,et al.  What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. , 1987 .

[7]  D. A. Taylor,et al.  The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[9]  Colin M. Macleod Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  D. Alan Allport,et al.  SHIFTING INTENTIONAL SET - EXPLORING THE DYNAMIC CONTROL OF TASKS , 1994 .

[11]  N. Meiran Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. , 1996 .

[12]  S. Keele,et al.  Changing internal constraints on action: the role of backward inhibition. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  R. A. Carlson,et al.  Effects of repetition and foreknowledge in task-set reconfiguration. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Reconfiguration of stimulus task sets and response task sets during task switching , 2000 .

[15]  J. Driver,et al.  Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII , 2000 .

[16]  T Kleinsorge,et al.  Implicit learning of sequences of tasks. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[17]  S Monsell,et al.  Naming the color of a word: Is it responses or task sets that compete? , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[18]  E Ruthruff,et al.  Switching between simple cognitive tasks: the interaction of top-down and bottom-up factors. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  D. Meyer,et al.  Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J R Anderson,et al.  Task preparation and task repetition: two-component model of task switching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[21]  I Koch,et al.  Automatic and intentional activation of task sets. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  Hilde Haider,et al.  Preparatory processes in the task-switching paradigm: evidence from the use of probability cues. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  T. Shallice,et al.  Task Switching : A PDP Model , 2001 .

[24]  I. Koch,et al.  The role of response selection for inhibition of task sets in task shifting. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Nonintentional task set activation: Evidence from implicit task sequence learning , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[26]  S. Monsell Task switching , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[27]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Selection for Cognitive Control: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on the Selection of Task-Relevant Information , 2004, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  N. Meiran,et al.  On the origins of the task mixing cost in the cuing task-switching paradigm. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Darryl W. Schneider,et al.  Modeling task switching without switching tasks: a short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Advance task preparation reduces task error rate in the cuing task-switching paradigm , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[31]  I. Koch,et al.  Exogenous Influences on Task Set Activation in Task Switching , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[32]  A. Henik,et al.  Evidence for task conflict in the Stroop effect. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  I. Koch,et al.  Cue–task associations in task switching , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. , 2008, Psychological review.

[35]  Yoav Kessler,et al.  Control by action representation and input selection (CARIS): a theoretical framework for task switching , 2008, Psychological research.

[36]  Yoav Kessler,et al.  The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  P. Haggard Human volition: towards a neuroscience of will , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[38]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  The dual implication of dual affordance: stimulus-task binding and attentional focus changing during task preparation. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[39]  M. Steinhauser,et al.  Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  Nachshon Meiran,et al.  Task Switching: Mechanisms Underlying Rigid vs. Flexible Self-control , 2009 .

[41]  A. Jersild Mental set and shift , 2011 .