Comparison of collective Thomson scattering signals due to fast ions in ITER scenarios with fusion and auxiliary heating

Auxiliary heating such as neutral beam injection (NBI) and ion cyclotron resonance heating (ICRH) will accelerate ions in ITER up to energies in the MeV range, i.e. energies which are also typical for alpha particles. Fast ions of any of these populations will elevate the collective Thomson scattering (CTS) signal for the proposed CTS diagnostic in ITER. It is of interest to determine the contributions of these fast ion populations to the CTS signal for large Doppler shifts of the scattered radiation since conclusions can mostly be drawn for the dominant contributor. In this study, distribution functions of fast ions generated by NBI and ICRH are calculated for a steady-state ITER burning plasma equilibrium with the ASCOT and PION codes, respectively. The parameters for the auxiliary heating systems correspond to the design currently foreseen for ITER. The geometry of the CTS system for ITER is chosen such that near perpendicular and near parallel velocity components are resolved. In the investigated ICRH scenario, waves at 50 MHz resonate with tritium at the second harmonic off-axis on the low field side. Effects of a minority heating scheme with 3He are also considered. CTS scattering functions for fast deuterons, fast tritons, fast 3He and the fusion born alphas are presented, revealing that fusion alphas dominate the measurable signal by an order of magnitude or more in the Doppler shift frequency ranges typical for fast ions. Hence the observable CTS signal can mostly be attributed to the alpha population in these frequency ranges. The exceptions are limited regions in space with some non-negligible signal due to beam ions or fast 3He which give rise to about 30% and 10–20% of the CTS signal, respectively. In turn, the dominance of the alpha contribution implies that the effects of other fast ion contributions will be difficult to observe by CTS.

[1]  Jukka Heikkinen,et al.  Power transfer and current generation of fast ions with large‐kθ waves in tokamak plasmas , 1995 .

[2]  Henrik Bindslev,et al.  Chapter 7: Diagnostics , 2007 .

[3]  M. S. Chance,et al.  Low-n shear Alfven spectra in axisymmetric toroidal plasmas , 1986 .

[4]  P. Woskov,et al.  Temporal evolution of confined fast-ion velocity distributions measured by collective Thomson scattering in TEXTOR. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Taina Kurki-Suonio,et al.  Paritcle simulation of the neoclassical plasmas , 2001 .

[6]  W. Heidbrink,et al.  CORRIGENDUM: The behaviour of fast ions in tokamak experiments , 1994 .

[7]  Marshall N. Rosenbluth,et al.  Plasma Transport in Toroidal Confinement Systems , 1972 .

[8]  ITER relevant ICRF heating scenarios with large ion heating fraction , 2000 .

[9]  J. Contributors,et al.  The role of energetic particles in fusion plasmas , 2004 .

[10]  W. Heidbrink.  Alpha particle physics in a tokamak burning plasma experiment , 2002 .

[11]  P. Woskov,et al.  Fast-ion dynamics in the TEXTOR tokamak measured by collective Thomson scattering , 2006, Physical review letters.

[12]  M. N. Rosenbluth,et al.  Excitation of Alfven waves by high-energy ions in a tokamak , 1975 .

[13]  R. Budny,et al.  Alpha Particle Physics Experiments in the Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor , 2000 .

[14]  M. Rosenbluth,et al.  Chapter 5: Physics of energetic ions , 1999 .

[15]  H. Bindslev,et al.  Fast Ion Collective Thomson Scattering Diagnostic for ITER: Design Elements , 2008 .

[16]  Paul P. Woskov,et al.  Feasibility study of fast ion diagnosis in ITER by collective Thomson scattering, millimeter waves to CO2 laser , 2004 .

[17]  H. Bindslev.  Three wave mixing and Thomson scattering in plasmas , 1993 .

[18]  H Bindslev,et al.  Investigation of first mirror heating for the collective Thomson scattering diagnostic in ITER. , 2008, The Review of scientific instruments.

[19]  H. Bindslev,et al.  Fast-Ion Velocity Distributions in JET Measured by Collective Thomson Scattering , 1999 .

[20]  A. Polevoi,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 2007 .

[21]  T. Hellsten,et al.  Comparison of time dependent simulations with experiments in ion cyclotron heated plasmas , 1993 .

[22]  Paul P. Woskov,et al.  Design of the collective Thomson scattering diagnostic for International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor at the 60 GHz frequency range , 2004 .

[23]  Radial diffusion of energetic tail ions driven by electromagnetic waves of ion‐cyclotron range of frequencies in bumpy torus and tokamak geometry , 1985 .

[24]  H. Bindslev.  A quantitative study of scattering from electromagnetic fluctuations in plasmas , 1996 .

[25]  R. Budny,et al.  Impact of beam ions on α-particle measurements by collective Thomson scattering in ITER , 2005 .

[26]  Allen H. Boozer,et al.  Monte Carlo evaluation of transport coefficients , 1981 .

[27]  M. Takechi,et al.  Particle simulation of bursting Alfven modes in JT-60U , 2006 .

[28]  Current Drive,et al.  Chapter 5: Physics of energetic ions , 1999 .

[29]  C. D. Challis,et al.  Non-inductively driven currents in JET , 1989 .

[30]  L. Chen,et al.  Theory of Alfvén waves and energetic particle physics in burning plasmas , 2007 .

[31]  L. Eriksson,et al.  A MODEL FOR CALCULATING ICRH POWER DEPOSITION AND VELOCITY DISTRIBUTION , 1995 .