Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage

This Note addresses the long-standing discrepancy between scholarly support for the effect of constituency service on incumbency advantage and a large body of contradictory empirical evidence. I show first that many of the methodological problems noticed in past research reduce to a single methodological problem that is readily resolved. The core of this Note then provides among the first systematic empirical evidence for the constituency service hypothesis. Specifically, an extra $10,000 added to the budget of the average state legislator gives this incumbent an additional 1.54 percentage points in the next election (with a 95% confidence interval of 1.14 to 1.94 percentage points). .

[1]  N. Polsby.  The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives , 1968, American Political Science Review.

[2]  Robert S. Erikson.  The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections , 1971, Polity.

[3]  John C. Blydenburgh,et al.  A Controlled Experiment to Measure the Effects of Personal Contact Campaigning , 1971 .

[4]  Robert S. Erikson,et al.  Malapportionment, Gerrymandering, and Party Fortunes in Congressional Elections , 1972, American Political Science Review.

[5]  John A. Ferejohn,et al.  On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections , 1977, American Political Science Review.

[6]  Candice J. Nelson.  The Effect of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections, 1964-1974 , 1978 .

[7]  Richard Born,et al.  Generational Replacement and the Growth of Incumbent Reelection Margins in the U.S. House , 1979, American Political Science Review.

[8]  Thomas E. Mann,et al.  Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[9]  James L. Payne,et al.  The Personal Electoral Advantage of House Incumbents, 1936-1976 , 1980 .

[10]  John R. Johannes,et al.  The Congressional Incumbency Effect: Is It Casework, Policy Compatibility, or Something Else? An Examination of the 1978 Election , 1981 .

[11]  M. Fiorina.  Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections , 1981 .

[12]  J. R. Alford,et al.  Increased Incumbency Advantage in the House , 1981, The Journal of Politics.

[13]  Albert D. Cover,et al.  Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent Opinion , 1982 .

[14]  John R. Wright,et al.  The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections: A Test of Two Explanations , 1983 .

[15]  Congressional Elections and Local Federal , 1984 .

[16]  J. Jondrow,et al.  Congressional Elections and Local Federal Spending , 1984 .

[17]  Donald A. Gross,et al.  Changes in the Vote Margins for Congressional Candidates: A Specification of Historical Trends , 1984, American Political Science Review.

[18]  J. Ferejohn,et al.  Presidential Coattails in Historical Perspective , 1984 .

[19]  B. Silverman.  Density estimation for statistics and data analysis , 1986 .

[20]  T. Cook,et al.  Representatives'Actions and Challengers' Reactions: Limits to Candidate Connections in the House * , 1987 .

[21]  Malcolm E. Jewell,et al.  The Effect of Incumbency on State Legislative Elections , 1988 .

[22]  William H. Flanigan,et al.  The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. , 1988 .

[23]  A. Gelman,et al.  Estimating Incumbency Advantage Without Bias , 1990 .

[24]  Thomas E. Mann,et al.  Vital statistics on congress, 1989-1990 , 1990 .