Sex differences in strength - some observations on their variability.

One hundred and twelve datasets, which allowed a direct comparison of the strengths of men and women, were located in the published literature. For each of these, three indices of sex difference were calculated: the ratio of the mean female strength to the mean male (F/M), the proportion of the total variance in strength attributable to sex (R(2)) and the "percentage of chance encounters between members of the opposite sex in which the female is stronger" (%CEFS). Sex difference was shown to be very variable, the values of these indices being both task and population specific. An experiment was conducted in which male and female subjects gripped and turned knurled cylindrical handles of 10, 30, 50 and 70 mm diameter. Maximum isometric torques were recorded. Sex differences became more pronounced as handle size increased. The optimal handle-size was 50 mm for both male and female subjects. Data concerning whole body exertion (Pheasant et al, 1982) were also analysed for sex differences. It was concluded that very similar tests of strength could exhibit very different levels of sex difference. The task or equipment designer should not make assumptions about sex differences in strength for a particular action, but should rely on empirical investigation.

[1]  S. Sepic,et al.  Maximum isometric torque of hip abductor and adductor muscles. , 1968, Physical therapy.

[2]  R G Mortimer Foot brake pedal force capability of drivers. , 1974, Ergonomics.

[3]  D O'Neill,et al.  Performance in gripping and turning -a study in hand/handle effectiveness. , 1975, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  S T Pheasant,et al.  The principal features of maximal exertion in the sagittal plane. , 1981, Ergonomics.

[5]  Andris Freivalds The Development and use of Biomechanical Strength Models , 1982 .

[6]  R. E. Ducharme Problem tools for women : Industrial Engineering, Sep 1975, 7.9, 46–50 , 1976 .

[7]  A. E. Chapman,et al.  The strength of the flexor and extensor muscles of the trunk. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  R. Mcfarland,et al.  The Human Body in Equipment Design , 1966 .

[9]  H J Montoye,et al.  Grip and arm strength in males and females, age 10 to 69. , 1977, Research quarterly.

[10]  H. N. Magoun Thomas, Springfield, Illinois , 1965 .

[11]  S T Pheasant,et al.  Human strength in the operation of tractor pedals. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[12]  K. F. H. Murrell,et al.  Ergonomics: Man in His Working Environment , 1965 .

[14]  Robert G. Kinkade,et al.  Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design (Revised Edition) , 1972 .

[15]  G. L. Noel,et al.  Prolactin, thyrotropin, and growth hormone release during stress associated with parachute jumping. , 1976, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[16]  L Nordgren,et al.  A new method for testing isometric muscle strength under standardized conditions. , 1968, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation.

[17]  S T Pheasant,et al.  Vector representations of human strength in whole body exertion. , 1982, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  S. T. Pheasant A biomechanical analysis of human strength , 1977 .

[19]  B. Nordgren Anthropometric measures and muscle strength in young women. , 1972, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[20]  Lloyd L Laubach,et al.  Muscular Strength of Women and Men: A Comparative Study , 1976 .