Turning a surface superrepellent even to completely wetting liquids

Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic surfaces have so far been made by roughening a hydrophobic material. However, no surfaces were able to repel extremely-low-energy liquids such as fluorinated solvents, which completely wet even the most hydrophobic material. We show how roughness alone, if made of a specific doubly reentrant structure that enables very low liquid-solid contact fraction, can render the surface of any material superrepellent. Starting from a completely wettable material (silica), we micro- and nanostructure its surface to make it superomniphobic and bounce off all available liquids, including perfluorohexane. The same superomniphobicity is further confirmed with identical surfaces of a metal and a polymer. Free of any hydrophobic coating, the superomniphobic silica surface also withstands temperatures over 1000°C and resists biofouling. Surface roughness alone can make a material superrepellent to almost any liquid. Undercutting the surface keeps liquids at bay The shape of an umbrella is designed both to protect the holder from falling droplets and to have the collected rainwater flow away from the person underneath. Liu and Kim exploited the idea of an umbrella to make materials with a surface that repels almost any liquid. Science, this issue p. 1096

[1]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[2]  Igor Luzinov,et al.  Superomniphobic magnetic microtextures with remote wetting control. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[3]  C. Neinhuis,et al.  Tunable nano-replication to explore the omniphobic characteristics of springtail skin , 2013 .

[4]  H. Zou,et al.  Fabrication of super-hydrophobic film from PMMA with intrinsic water contact angle below 90° , 2007 .

[5]  Chang-Hwan Choi,et al.  Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[6]  Paul Heremans,et al.  Static solvent contact angle measurements, surface free energy and wettability determination of various self-assembled monolayers on silicon dioxide , 2006 .

[7]  David Quéré,et al.  Non-sticking drops , 2005 .

[8]  Chang-Jin Kim,et al.  Underwater restoration and retention of gases on superhydrophobic surfaces for drag reduction. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[9]  Periklis Papadopoulos,et al.  How superhydrophobicity breaks down , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Carsten Werner,et al.  Wetting resistance at its topographical limit: the benefit of mushroom and serif T structures. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[11]  R. Webb The Evolution of Enhanced Surface Geometries for Nucleate Boiling , 1981 .

[12]  D. Lynch,et al.  Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids , 1985 .

[13]  M. Harnois,et al.  Engineering sticky superomniphobic surfaces on transparent and flexible PDMS substrate. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[14]  C. Furmidge,et al.  Studies at phase interfaces. I. The sliding of liquid drops on solid surfaces and a theory for spray retention , 1962 .

[15]  Gareth H McKinley,et al.  A modified Cassie-Baxter relationship to explain contact angle hysteresis and anisotropy on non-wetting textured surfaces. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[16]  Doris Vollmer,et al.  Candle Soot as a Template for a Transparent Robust Superamphiphobic Coating , 2012, Science.

[17]  V. Carey Liquid-Vapor Phase-Change Phenomena: An Introduction to the Thermophysics of Vaporization and Condensation Processes in Heat Transfer Equipment, Third Edition , 2020 .

[18]  A. Tuteja,et al.  Hierarchically Structured Superoleophobic Surfaces with Ultralow Contact Angle Hysteresis , 2012, Advanced materials.

[19]  P. J. Marto,et al.  Effects of surface conditions on nucleate pool boiling of sodium. , 1966 .

[20]  D. Quéré,et al.  Contact angle hysteresis generated by strong dilute defects. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  Evelyn N Wang,et al.  Unified model for contact angle hysteresis on heterogeneous and superhydrophobic surfaces. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[22]  C. Kim,et al.  Boiling heat transfer on superhydrophilic, superhydrophobic, and superbiphilic surfaces , 2012, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer.

[23]  Gareth H. McKinley,et al.  Designing Superoleophobic Surfaces , 2007, Science.

[24]  Lounes Tadrist,et al.  Sessile Drop in Microgravity: Creation, Contact Angle and Interface , 2009 .

[25]  A. Hozumi,et al.  Unusual dynamic dewetting behavior of smooth perfluorinated hybrid films: potential advantages over conventional textured and liquid-infused perfluorinated surfaces. , 2013, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[26]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Petal effect: a superhydrophobic state with high adhesive force. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[27]  Gareth H McKinley,et al.  Robust omniphobic surfaces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[29]  Rebecca A. Belisle,et al.  Liquid-infused structured surfaces with exceptional anti-biofouling performance , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Tomohiro Onda,et al.  Super-Water-Repellent Fractal Surfaces , 1995 .

[31]  S. Lewin Blood Serum Surface Tension and its Potential , 1972, British journal of haematology.

[32]  Sindy K. Y. Tang,et al.  Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity , 2011, Nature.