Effect of surface texturing on superoleophobicity, contact angle hysteresis, and "robustness".

Previously, we reported the creation of a fluorosilane (FOTS) modified pillar array silicon surface comprising ~3-μm-diameter pillars (6 μm pitch with ~7 μm height) that is both superhydrophobic and superoleophobic, with water and hexadecane contact angles exceeding 150° and sliding angles at ~10° owing to the surface fluorination and the re-entrant structure in the side wall of the pillar. In this work, the effects of surface texturing (pillar size, spacing, and height) on wettability, contact angle hysteresis, and "robustness" are investigated. We study the static, advancing, and receding contact angles, as well as the sliding angles as a function of the solid area fraction. The results reveal that pillar size and pillar spacing have very little effect on the static and advancing contact angles, as they are found to be insensitive to the solid area fraction from 0.04 to ~0.4 as the pillar diameter varies from 1 to 5 μm and the center-to-center spacing varies from 4.5 to 12 μm. On the other hand, sliding angle, receding contact angle, and contact angle hysteresis are found to be dependent on the solid area fraction. Specifically, receding contact angle decreases and sliding angle and hysteresis increase as the solid area fraction increases. This effect can be attributable to the increase in pinning as the solid area fraction increases. Surface Evolver modeling shows that water wets and pins the pillar surface whereas hexadecane wets the pillar surface and then penetrates into the side wall of the pillar with the contact line pinning underneath the re-entrant structure. Due to the penetration of the hexadecane drop into the pillar structure, the effect on the receding contact angle and hysteresis is larger relative to that of water. This interpretation is supported by studying a series of FOTS pillar array surfaces with varying overhang thickness. With the water drop, the contact line is pinned on the pillar surface and very little overhang thickness effect was observed. On the other hand, the hexadecane drop is shown to wet the pillar surface and the side wall of the overhang. It then pins at the lower edge of the overhang structure. A plot of the thickness of the overhang as a function of the static, advancing, and receding contact angles and sliding angle of hexadecane reveals that static, advancing, and receding contact angles decrease and sliding angle increases as the thickness of the overhang increases. A larger overhang effect is observed with octane due to its lower surface tension. The robustness of the pillar array surface against external pressure induced wetting and abrasion was modeled. Surface Evolver simulation (with the hexadecane drop) indicates that wetting breakthrough pressure as high as ~70 kPa is achievable with 0.5-μm-diameter pillar array FOTS surfaces. Mechanical modeling shows that bending of the pillars is the key failure by abrasion, which can be avoided with a short pillar structure. The path to fabricate a superoleophobic surface that can withstand the external force equivalent of a gentle cleaning blade (up to ~30 kPa) without wetting and abrasion failure is discussed.

[1]  Jürgen Rühe,et al.  Advancing and receding motion of droplets on ultrahydrophobic post surfaces. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  Hong Zhao,et al.  Fabrication, surface properties, and origin of superoleophobicity for a model textured surface. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[3]  Wilhelm Barthlott,et al.  Characterization and Distribution of Water-repellent, Self-cleaning Plant Surfaces , 1997 .

[4]  Hong Zhao,et al.  Super toner and ink repellent superoleophobic surface. , 2012, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[5]  Eduard Arzt,et al.  Adhesion of bioinspired micropatterned surfaces: effects of pillar radius, aspect ratio, and preload. , 2007, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[6]  Ganesh L. Harpavat A Theoretical Study of the Mechanics of a Xerographic Cleaning Blade , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[7]  Gareth H McKinley,et al.  Robust omniphobic surfaces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Michael Nosonovsky Model for solid-liquid and solid-solid friction of rough surfaces with adhesion hysteresis. , 2007, The Journal of chemical physics.

[9]  F. He,et al.  Sliding of water droplets on microstructured hydrophobic surfaces. , 2010, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Superhydrophobic surfaces: from structural control to functional application , 2008 .

[11]  T. J. McCarthy,et al.  Contact angle hysteresis on superhydrophobic surfaces: an ionic liquid probe fluid offers mechanistic insight. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[12]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Replica molding of high-aspect-ratio polymeric nanopillar arrays with high fidelity. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[13]  Michael Newton,et al.  Progess in superhydrophobic surface development. , 2008, Soft matter.

[14]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces , 1997, Planta.

[15]  Akira Fujishima,et al.  Sliding of water droplets on the superhydrophobic surface with ZnO nanorods. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  Gareth H McKinley,et al.  A modified Cassie-Baxter relationship to explain contact angle hysteresis and anisotropy on non-wetting textured surfaces. , 2009, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[17]  A. Cassie,et al.  Wettability of porous surfaces , 1944 .

[18]  Gareth H. McKinley,et al.  Designing Superoleophobic Surfaces , 2007, Science.

[19]  Kenneth A. Brakke,et al.  The Surface Evolver , 1992, Exp. Math..