Gender Stereotypes in Science Education Resources: A Visual Content Analysis

More men are studying and working in science fields than women. This could be an effect of the prevalence of gender stereotypes (e.g., science is for men, not for women). Aside from the media and people’s social lives, such stereotypes can also occur in education. Ways in which stereotypes are visible in education include the use of gender-biased visuals, language, teaching methods, and teachers’ attitudes. The goal of this study was to determine whether science education resources for primary school contained gender-biased visuals. Specifically, the total number of men and women depicted, and the profession and activity of each person in the visuals were noted. The analysis showed that there were more men than women depicted with a science profession and that more women than men were depicted as teachers. This study shows that there is a stereotypical representation of men and women in online science education resources, highlighting the changes needed to create a balanced representation of men and women. Even if the stereotypical representation of men and women in science is a true reflection of the gender distribution in science, we should aim for a more balanced representation. Such a balance is an essential first step towards showing children that both men and women can do science, which will contribute to more gender-balanced science and technology fields.

[1]  M. G. Jones,et al.  Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists , 2000 .

[2]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[3]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data , 2007 .

[4]  B. Hannover,et al.  Self-to-Prototype Matching as a Strategy for Making Academic Choices. Why High School Students Do Not like Math and Science. , 2004 .

[5]  A. Elgar.  Science textbooks for lower secondary schools in Brunei: issues of gender equity , 2004 .

[6]  Douglas P. Newton,et al.  Primary children's conceptions of science and the scientist : is the impact of a National Curriculum breaking down the stereotype? , 1998 .

[7]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations 1 , 2013 .

[8]  Lucy Avraamidou.  Superheroes and supervillains: reconstructing the mad-scientist stereotype in school science , 2013 .

[9]  J. Olsen,et al.  The European Commission , 2020, The European Union.

[10]  Gwyneth Hughes,et al.  Exploring the Availability of Student Scientist Identities within Curriculum Discourse: An anti-essentialist approach to gender-inclusive science , 2001 .

[11]  Annie Desprez-Bouanchaud,et al.  Guidelines on Gender-Neutral Language , 1999 .

[12]  E. A. Desy,et al.  Gender Differences in Science-Related Attitudes and Interests among Middle School and High School Students. , 2011 .

[13]  Heidi B. Carlone,et al.  The Cultural Production of Science in Reform-based Physics: Girls’ Access, Participation, and Resistance , 2004 .

[14]  Julie A. Moore,et al.  Beginning teachers’ use of online resources and communities , 2007 .

[15]  Carole Brugeilles,et al.  Promoting gender equality through textbooks: a methodological guide , 2009 .

[16]  Anders Jidesjö.  Different content orientations in science and technology among primary and secondary boys and girls in Sweden : Implications for the transition from primary to secondary school? , 2012 .

[17]  Ricardo Trumper,et al.  Factors Affecting Junior High School Students' Interest in Physics , 2006 .

[18]  B. Hannover,et al.  How gender fair are German schoolbooks in the twenty-first century? An analysis of language and illustrations in schoolbooks for mathematics and German , 2014 .

[19]  S. Hofer.  Studying Gender Bias in Physics Grading: The role of teaching experience and country , 2015 .

[20]  Mimi Recker,et al.  Teacher Design Using Online Learning Resources: A Comparative Case Study of Science and Mathematics Teachers , 2013 .

[21]  C. Dawson,et al.  Upper primary boys' and girls' interests in science: have they changed since 1980? , 2000 .

[22]  Ernesto Reuben,et al.  How stereotypes impair women’s careers in science , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  P. Bell.  Content Analysis of Visual Images , 2004 .

[24]  Peter Whiteley.  CURRICULUM MATTERS: The gender balance of physics textbooks: Caribbean and British books, 1985-91 , 1996 .

[25]  R. Weinstein,et al.  The development and consequences of stereotype consciousness in middle childhood. , 2003, Child development.

[26]  B. Chilisa.  Towards Equity in Assessment: Crafting gender-fair assessment , 2000 .

[27]  Stephen J. Farenga,et al.  Intentions of Young Students to Enroll in Science Courses in the Future: An Examination of Gender Differences. , 1999 .

[28]  Margaret Shih,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility in Children: Effects of Identity Activation on Quantitative Performance , 2001, Psychological science.

[29]  R. Blumberg.  The invisible obstacle to educational equality: gender bias in textbooks , 2008 .

[30]  W. Noyes.  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization , 1946, International Organization.

[31]  Vicki L. Plano Clark,et al.  Examining the cognitive processes used by adolescent girls and women scientists in identifying science role models: A feminist approach , 2008 .

[32]  Kathryn L. Boucher,et al.  Why so Few , 2017 .

[33]  Thomas D. Snyder,et al.  Digest of Education Statistics , 1994 .

[34]  Peter Collins,et al.  Australian English‐language textbooks: the gender issues , 2009 .

[35]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[36]  Felicia M. Moore,et al.  Girls and science: A review of four themes in the science education literature , 2008 .

[37]  M. Warrington,et al.  The Other Side of the Gender Gap , 2000 .

[38]  Jonathan Osborne,et al.  “Balancing acts'': Elementary school girls' negotiations of femininity, achievement, and science , 2012 .

[39]  S. Adamo.  Attrition of Women in the Biological Sciences: Workload, Motherhood, and Other Explanations Revisited , 2013 .

[40]  Jessica J. Good,et al.  The Effects of Gender Stereotypic and Counter-Stereotypic Textbook Images on Science Performance , 2010, The Journal of social psychology.

[41]  L. Paddison,et al.  Why so Few , 1986 .

[42]  D. Sadker,et al.  Gender Bias in Teacher Education Texts , 2002 .

[43]  Alison Lockley,et al.  Open education resources , 2015 .

[44]  Martin Brunner,et al.  How can we enhance girls' interest in scientific topics? , 2011, The British journal of educational psychology.

[45]  Helen Mackenzie,et al.  Evaluation of curriculum online: Report of the third survey of schools , 2006 .

[46]  Damian Maher,et al.  Primary school teachers' use of digital resources with interactive whiteboards: The Australian context , 2012 .

[47]  Aik-Ling Tan,et al.  Spiderman and science: How students’ perceptions of scientists are shaped by popular media , 2017, Public understanding of science.

[48]  L M Branscomb,et al.  Women in science. , 1979, Science.