Evolving classifiers to inform clinical assessment of Parkinson's disease

We describe the use of a genetic programming system to induce classifiers that can discriminate between Parkinson's disease patients and healthy age-matched controls. The best evolved classifer achieved an AUC of 0.92, which is comparable with clinical diagnosis rates. Compared to previous studies of this nature, we used a relatively large sample of 49 PD patients and 41 controls, allowing us to better capture the wide diversity seen within the Parkinson's population. Classifiers were induced from recordings of these subjects' movements as they carried out repetitive finger tapping, a standard clinical assessment for Parkinson's disease. For ease of interpretability, we used a relatively simple window-based classifier architecture which captures patterns that occur over a single tap cycle. Analysis of window matches suggested the importance of peak closing deceleration as a basis for classification. This was supported by a follow-up analysis of the data set, showing that closing deceleration is more discriminative than features typically used in clinical assessment of finger tapping.

[1]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  Cartesian genetic programming , 2010, GECCO.

[2]  Stephen L. Smith,et al.  Diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease using evolutionary algorithms , 2007, Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines.

[3]  Jon Timmis,et al.  An immune network inspired evolutionary algorithm for the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease , 2008, Biosyst..

[4]  K. Akazawa,et al.  Opening velocity, a novel parameter, for finger tapping test in patients with Parkinson's disease. , 2009, Parkinsonism & related disorders.

[5]  Academisch Proefschrift,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Clinimetrics , clinical profile and prognosis in early Parkinson ’ s disease , 2009 .

[6]  J. Jankovic,et al.  Movement Disorder Society‐sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS‐UPDRS): Process, format, and clinimetric testing plan , 2007, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[7]  M. Breteler,et al.  Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[8]  Andrew M. Tyrrell,et al.  An Implicit Context Representation for Evolving Image Processing Filters , 2005, EvoWorkshops.

[9]  Resul Das,et al.  A comparison of multiple classification methods for diagnosis of Parkinson disease , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Andrew M. Tyrrell,et al.  Characterising neurological time series data using biologically motivated networks of coupled discrete maps , 2013, Biosyst..

[11]  Helena Chmura Kraemer,et al.  Measures of clinical significance. , 2003, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[12]  Stephen L. Smith,et al.  Objective Assessment of Visuo-spatial Ability using Implicit Context Representation Cartesian Genetic Programming , 2011, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation: Medical Applications.

[13]  S. L. Smith,et al.  A novel computer-based technique for the assessment of tremor in Parkinson's disease. , 2007, Age and ageing.

[14]  Andrew J Lees,et al.  Accuracy of clinical diagnosis in tremulous parkinsonian patients: a blinded video study , 2010, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[15]  Max A. Little,et al.  Suitability of Dysphonia Measurements for Telemonitoring of Parkinson's Disease , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  Robert Chen,et al.  The modified bradykinesia rating scale for Parkinson's disease: Reliability and comparison with kinematic measures , 2011, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[17]  Stephen L. Smith,et al.  Discriminating normal and cancerous thyroid cell lines using implicit context representation Cartesian genetic programming , 2010, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[18]  A. Siderowf,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review of the literature. , 2003, Evidence report/technology assessment.