Characterization of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by NMR-guided metadynamics

The use of free-energy landscapes rationalizes a wide range of aspects of protein behavior by providing a clear illustration of the different states accessible to these molecules, as well as of their populations and pathways of interconversion. The determination of the free-energy landscapes of proteins by computational methods is, however, very challenging as it requires an extensive sampling of their conformational spaces. We describe here a technique to achieve this goal with relatively limited computational resources by incorporating nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) chemical shifts as collective variables in metadynamics simulations. As in this approach the chemical shifts are not used as structural restraints, the resulting free-energy landscapes correspond to the force fields used in the simulations. We illustrate this approach in the case of the third Ig-binding domain of protein G from streptococcal bacteria (GB3). Our calculations reveal the existence of a folding intermediate of GB3 with nonnative structural elements. Furthermore, the availability of the free-energy landscape enables the folding mechanism of GB3 to be elucidated by analyzing the conformational ensembles corresponding to the native, intermediate, and unfolded states, as well as the transition states between them. Taken together, these results show that, by incorporating experimental data as collective variables in metadynamics simulations, it is possible to enhance the sampling efficiency by two or more orders of magnitude with respect to standard molecular dynamics simulations, and thus to estimate free-energy differences among the different states of a protein with a kBT accuracy by generating trajectories of just a few microseconds.

[1]  Andrej Sali,et al.  Assembly of macromolecular complexes by satisfaction of spatial restraints from electron microscopy images , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  F. Morcos,et al.  Genomics-aided structure prediction , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Structure of an Intermediate State in Protein Folding and Aggregation , 2012, Science.

[4]  Paul Robustelli,et al.  Characterization of the conformational equilibrium between the two major substates of RNase A using NMR chemical shifts. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[5]  R. Best Atomistic molecular simulations of protein folding. , 2012, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  Alessandro Laio,et al.  Protein Folding and Ligand-Enzyme Binding from Bias-Exchange Metadynamics Simulations , 2012 .

[7]  Alessandro Laio,et al.  METAGUI. A VMD interface for analyzing metadynamics and molecular dynamics simulations , 2012, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[8]  R. Dror,et al.  How Fast-Folding Proteins Fold , 2011, Science.

[9]  Valerie Daggett,et al.  GB1 is not a two-state folder: identification and characterization of an on-pathway intermediate. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[10]  Michele Vendruscolo,et al.  Determination of Conformational Equilibria in Proteins Using Residual Dipolar Couplings , 2011, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  K. Lindorff-Larsen,et al.  How robust are protein folding simulations with respect to force field parameterization? , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[12]  Simon W. Ginzinger,et al.  SHIFTX2: significantly improved protein chemical shift prediction , 2011, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[13]  Carlo Camilloni,et al.  Hierarchy of folding and unfolding events of protein G, CI2, and ACBP from explicit-solvent simulations. , 2011, The Journal of chemical physics.

[14]  Joseph A. Bank,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S10 Table S1 References Movies S1 to S3 Atomic-level Characterization of the Structural Dynamics of Proteins , 2022 .

[15]  Kai J. Kohlhoff,et al.  Using NMR chemical shifts as structural restraints in molecular dynamics simulations of proteins. , 2010, Structure.

[16]  A. Bax,et al.  SPARTA+: a modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by means of an artificial neural network , 2010, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[17]  Kai J. Kohlhoff,et al.  Fast and accurate predictions of protein NMR chemical shifts from interatomic distances. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[18]  Alessandro Laio,et al.  A Collective Variable for the Efficient Exploration of Protein Beta-Sheet Structures: Application to SH3 and GB1. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[19]  Alessandro Laio,et al.  A Kinetic Model of Trp-Cage Folding from Multiple Biased Molecular Dynamics Simulations , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[20]  A. Bax,et al.  TALOS+: a hybrid method for predicting protein backbone torsion angles from NMR chemical shifts , 2009, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[21]  Massimiliano Bonomi,et al.  PLUMED: A portable plugin for free-energy calculations with molecular dynamics , 2009, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[22]  A. Laio,et al.  Metadynamics: a method to simulate rare events and reconstruct the free energy in biophysics, chemistry and material science , 2008 .

[23]  J. P. Grossman,et al.  Anton, a special-purpose machine for molecular dynamics simulation , 2008, CACM.

[24]  Oliver F. Lange,et al.  Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Carsten Kutzner,et al.  GROMACS 4:  Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation. , 2008, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[26]  Markus Christen,et al.  On searching in, sampling of, and dynamically moving through conformational space of biomolecular systems: A review , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[27]  R. Broglia,et al.  Exploring the protein G helix free‐energy surface by solute tempering metadynamics , 2007, Proteins.

[28]  A. Laio,et al.  A bias-exchange approach to protein folding. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[29]  A. Laio,et al.  Equilibrium free energies from nonequilibrium metadynamics. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[30]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[31]  Ad Bax,et al.  Evaluation of backbone proton positions and dynamics in a small protein by liquid crystal NMR spectroscopy. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[32]  Zurich,et al.  Predicting crystal structures: the Parrinello-Rahman method revisited. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[33]  Michael R. Shirts,et al.  Atomistic protein folding simulations on the submillisecond time scale using worldwide distributed computing. , 2003, Biopolymers.

[34]  M. Karplus,et al.  Determination of a transition state at atomic resolution from protein engineering data. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  J. Berg,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules , 2002, Nature Structural Biology.

[36]  A. Laio,et al.  Escaping free-energy minima , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Jörg Gsponer,et al.  Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[38]  A. Fersht,et al.  Protein Folding and Unfolding at Atomic Resolution , 2002, Cell.

[39]  David Chandler,et al.  Transition path sampling: throwing ropes over rough mountain passes, in the dark. , 2002, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[40]  M. Karplus,et al.  Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state , 2001, Nature.

[41]  Vijay S. Pande,et al.  Screen Savers of the World Unite! , 2000, Science.

[42]  D. Baker,et al.  Critical role of β-hairpin formation in protein G folding , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[43]  D Baker,et al.  Critical role of beta-hairpin formation in protein G folding. , 2000, Nature structural biology.

[44]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids , 2000, Biopolymers.

[45]  Y. Sugita,et al.  Replica-exchange molecular dynamics method for protein folding , 1999 .

[46]  V. Muñoz,et al.  A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three-dimensional structures. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  A. R. Fresht Structure and Mechanism in Protein Science: A Guide to Enzyme Catalysis and Protein Folding , 1999 .

[48]  M. Karplus,et al.  Protein Folding: A Perspective from Theory and Experiment , 1998 .

[49]  H. Roder,et al.  An early intermediate in the folding reaction of the B1 domain of protein G contains a native-like core. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[50]  Berk Hess,et al.  LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations , 1997, J. Comput. Chem..

[51]  K. Dill,et al.  From Levinthal to pathways to funnels , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[52]  K Schulten,et al.  VMD: visual molecular dynamics. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[53]  T. Darden,et al.  A smooth particle mesh Ewald method , 1995 .

[54]  L Serrano,et al.  Folding of protein G B1 domain studied by the conformational characterization of fragments comprising its secondary structure elements. , 1995, European journal of biochemistry.

[55]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Navigating the folding routes , 1995, Science.

[56]  R. Swendsen,et al.  THE weighted histogram analysis method for free‐energy calculations on biomolecules. I. The method , 1992 .

[57]  P. Alexander,et al.  Kinetic analysis of folding and unfolding the 56 amino acid IgG-binding domain of streptococcal protein G. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[58]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[59]  Hoover,et al.  Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. , 1985, Physical review. A, General physics.

[60]  S. Nosé A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble , 1984 .

[61]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[62]  A. B. Bortz,et al.  A new algorithm for Monte Carlo simulation of Ising spin systems , 1975 .

[63]  J. Pople,et al.  Molecular orbital theory of aromatic ring currents , 1958 .