The Evolution of Renewable Energy Policy in OECD Countries: Aggregate Indicators and Determinants

This paper proposes different methods to aggregate heterogeneous policies for renewable energy. We compare time-varying indicators built using principal component analysis with average-based indicators. The main goal of the paper is to account for the evolution of both types of policy indicators with a set of common variables. Our empirical results are consistent with predictions of politicaleconomy models of environmental policies as lobbying, income and, to a less extent, inequality have expected effects on policy. The brown lobbying power, proxied by entry barriers in the energy sector, has negative influence on the policy indicators even when taking into account endogeneity in its effect. The results are also robust to dynamic panel specifications and to the exclusion of groups of countries. Interestingly, too, corruption has only an indirect effect on policy mediated by entry barriers, while the negative effect of inequality is much stronger for the richer countries.

[1]  V. Lauber,et al.  Three Decades of Renewable Electricity Policies in Germany , 2004 .

[2]  Wilbur John Coleman,et al.  Cross-Country Technology Diffusion: The Case of Computers , 2001 .

[3]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Resolving failures in recycling markets: the role of technological innovation , 2012 .

[4]  Jan F. Kiviet,et al.  On bias, inconsistency and efficiency of various estimators in dynamic panel data models , 1995 .

[5]  Paul Conway,et al.  Product Market Regulation in the Non-Manufacturing Sectors of OECD Countries: Measurement and Highlights , 2006 .

[6]  Toke S. Aidt.  Political internalization of economic externalities and environmental policy , 1998 .

[7]  P. Svenningsson,et al.  Seeing the wood for the trees: 25 years of renewable energy policy in Sweden , 2004 .

[8]  Hubert Kempf,et al.  Is Inequality Harmful for the Environment in a Growing Economy? , 2005 .

[9]  E. Magnani.  The Environmental Kuznets Curve, environmental protection policy and income distribution , 2000 .

[10]  H. Vollebergh,et al.  Corruption, federalism, and policy formation in the OECD: the case of energy policy , 2009 .

[11]  Frederic L. Pryor,et al.  Subjective And Objective Measures Of Governmental Regulations In OECD Nations , 2006 .

[12]  Massimiliano Mazzanti,et al.  Municipal Waste Kuznets Curves: Evidence on Socio-Economic Drivers and Policy Effectiveness from the EU , 2009 .

[13]  Danyel Reiche,et al.  Policy differences in the promotion of renewable energies in the EU member states , 2004 .

[14]  M. Porter,et al.  National environmental performance: an empirical analysis of policy results and determinants , 2005, Environment and Development Economics.

[15]  R. Blundell,et al.  Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models , 1998 .

[16]  J. List,et al.  Trade Liberalization, Corruption and Environmental Policy Formation: Theory and Evidence , 2000 .

[17]  David Wheeler,et al.  Environmental Regulation and Development: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis , 2001 .

[18]  Giovanni S. F. Bruno,et al.  Estimation and Inference in Dynamic Unbalanced Panel-data Models with a Small Number of Individuals , 2005 .

[19]  Richard G. Newell,et al.  Environmental and Technology Policies for Climate Mitigation , 2008 .

[20]  Elbert Dijkgraaf,et al.  Corruption and Energy Efficiency in OECD Countries: Theory and Evidence , 2004 .

[21]  J. List,et al.  How Elections Matter: Theory and Evidence from Environmental Policy , 2004 .

[22]  M. Arellano,et al.  Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations , 1991 .

[23]  John Gelissen,et al.  Explaining Popular Support for Environmental Protection , 2007 .

[24]  Ann L. Owen,et al.  Estimating dynamic panel data models: a guide for , 1999 .

[25]  Per G. Fredriksson,et al.  On the formation of industry lobby groups , 2000 .

[26]  Eric Neumayer,et al.  Kyoto Protocol cooperation: Does government corruption facilitate environmental lobbying? , 2007 .

[27]  Jan F. Kiviet,et al.  Expectations of expansions for estimators in a dynamic panel data model; some results for weakly-exogeneous regressors. , 1997 .

[28]  J. Persson,et al.  Economic Growth, Inequality, Democratization, and the Environment , 2003 .

[29]  Ivan Haščič,et al.  Technology and the diffusion of renewable energy , 2011 .

[30]  J. Svensson,et al.  Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy , 2003 .

[31]  R. Damania,et al.  Corruption, political competition and environmental policy , 2005 .

[32]  B. Roe,et al.  US consumers' willingness to pay for green electricity , 2001 .

[33]  Gregory L. Poe,et al.  The private provision of public goods: tests of a provision point mechanism for funding green power programs , 2002 .

[34]  Lawrence J. White,et al.  Innovation in pollution control , 1986 .

[35]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  Protection for Sale , 1992 .

[36]  Other.  Renewable energy: market and policy trends in IEA countries , 2004 .

[37]  Paul Conway,et al.  Product Market Regulation in OECD Countries: 1998 to 2003 , 2005 .

[38]  C. McAusland.  Voting for pollution policy: the importance of income inequality and openness to trade , 2003 .

[39]  L. Nesta,et al.  Determinants of Renewable Energy Innovation: Environmental Policies vs. Market Regulation , 2012 .

[40]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[41]  M. Kotchen,et al.  Climate Policy and Voluntary Initiatives: An Evaluation of the Connecticut Clean Energy Communities Program , 2010 .

[42]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Transforming the Energy Sector : The evolution of technological systems in renewable energy technology , 2004 .

[43]  A. Jaffe,et al.  A tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy , 2005 .

[44]  D. Popp,et al.  Renewable Energy Policies and Technological Innovation: Evidence Based on Patent Counts , 2008 .

[45]  Axel Franzen,et al.  The Wealth of Nations and Environmental Concern , 1999 .

[46]  Per G. Fredriksson.  The Political Economy of Pollution Taxes in a Small Open Economy , 1997 .

[47]  Ramón López,et al.  Corruption, Pollution, and the Kuznets Environment Curve , 2000 .

[48]  F. Vona,et al.  Income Inequality and the Development of Environmental Technologies , 2011 .

[49]  Matthew J. Kotchen,et al.  Private Provision of Environmental Public Goods: Household Participation in Green-Electricity Programs , 2007 .

[50]  R. Inglehart.  Public Support for Environmental Protection: Objective Problems and Subjective Values in 43 Societies , 1995, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[51]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The emergence of a growth industry: a comparative analysis of the German, Dutch and Swedish wind turbine industries , 2003 .

[52]  Ryan Wiser,et al.  Using contingent valuation to explore willingness to pay for renewable energy: A comparison of collective and voluntary payment vehicles , 2002 .