Performance analysis of microphone array methods

Abstract Microphone array methods aim at the characterization of multiple simultaneously operating sound sources. However, existing data processing algorithms have been shown to yield different results when applied to the same input data. The present paper introduces a method for estimating the reliability of such algorithms. Using Monte Carlo simulations, data sets with random variation of selected parameters are generated. Four different microphone array methods are applied to analyze the simulated data sets. The calculated results are compared with the expected outcome, and the dependency of the reliability on several parameters is quantified. It is shown not only that the performance of a method depends on the given source distribution, but also that the methods differ in terms of their sensitivity to imperfect input data.

[1]  Ennes Sarradj,et al.  Three-Dimensional Acoustic Source Mapping with Different Beamforming Steering Vector Formulations , 2012 .

[2]  Pieter Sijtsma,et al.  CLEAN Based on Spatial Source Coherence , 2007 .

[3]  K. Ehrenfried,et al.  Comparison of Iterative Deconvolution Algorithms for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources , 2007 .

[4]  C. M. Sparrow On Spectroscopic Resolving Power , 1916 .

[5]  Gert Herold,et al.  An Approach to Estimate the Reliability of Microphone Array Methods , 2015 .

[6]  Robert P. Dougherty,et al.  Deconvolution of Sources in Aeroacoustic Images from Phased Microphone Arrays Using Linear Programming , 2013 .

[7]  Georges Elias,et al.  Level Estimation of Extended Acoustic Sources Using a Parametric Method , 2004 .

[8]  Ennes Sarradj,et al.  Application of a Beamforming Technique to the Measurement of Airfoil Leading Edge Noise , 2012 .

[9]  Gert Herold,et al.  PRELIMINARY BENCHMARKING OF MICROPHONE ARRAY METHODS , 2014 .

[10]  Ennes Sarradj,et al.  A fast signal subspace approach for the determination of absolute levels from phased microphone array measurements , 2010 .

[11]  Thomas F. Brooks,et al.  A Deconvolution Approach for the Mapping of Acoustic Sources (DAMAS) Determined from Phased Microphone Arrays , 2006 .

[12]  P. Stoica,et al.  Sparsity constrained deconvolution approaches for acoustic source mapping. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[14]  Zhigang Chu,et al.  Comparison of deconvolution methods for the visualization of acoustic sources based on cross-spectral imaging function beamforming , 2014 .

[15]  Nikolas S. Zawodny,et al.  Comparison of Microphone Array Processing Techniques for Aeroacoustic Measurements , 2010 .

[16]  Gert Herold,et al.  A Python framework for microphone array data processing , 2017 .

[17]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Least angle regression , 2004, math/0406456.

[18]  Christophe Picard,et al.  A UNIFIED FORMALISM FOR ACOUSTIC IMAGING TECHNIQUES: ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE FRAME OF A DIDACTIC NUMERICAL BENCHMARK , 2016 .

[19]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  On the “degrees of freedom” of the lasso , 2007, 0712.0881.

[20]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques , 1993 .