Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling of Fluid‐Induced Seismicity

In this study, we present a Bayesian hierarchical framework to model fluid-induced seismicity. The framework is based on a non-homogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) with a fluid-induced seismicity rate proportional to the rate of injected fluid. The fluid-induced seismicity rate model depends upon a set of physically meaningful parameters, and has been validated for six fluid-induced case studies. In line with the vision of hierarchical Bayesian modeling, the rate parameters are considered as random variables. We develop both the Bayesian inference and updating rules, which are used to develop a probabilistic forecasting model. We tested the Basel 2006 fluid-induced seismic case study to prove that the hierarchical Bayesian model offers a suitable framework to coherently encode both epistemic uncertainty and aleatory variability. Moreover, it provides a robust and consistent short-term seismic forecasting model suitable for online risk quantification and mitigation.

[1]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Induced seismicity risk analysis of the 2006 Basel, Switzerland, Enhanced Geothermal System project: Influence of uncertainties on risk mitigation , 2015 .

[2]  Valentin Gischig,et al.  A stochastic model for induced seismicity based on non-linear pressure diffusion and irreversible permeability enhancement , 2013 .

[3]  H. Witteman,et al.  Cool but Counterproductive: Interactive, Web-Based Risk Communications Can Backfire , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[4]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  A statistical model for seismic hazard assessment of hydraulic‐fracturing‐induced seismicity , 2015 .

[5]  David H. Krantz,et al.  Testing the scenario hypothesis: An experimental comparison of scenarios and forecasts for decision support in a complex decision environment , 2017, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  Mark D. Zoback,et al.  How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates? , 2016, Science Advances.

[7]  Michel Campillo,et al.  Lapse-time-dependent coda-wave depth sensitivity to local velocity perturbations in 3-D heterogeneous elastic media , 2016 .

[8]  A. Kiureghian Non‐ergodicity and PEER's framework formula , 2005 .

[9]  Eric Larose,et al.  Noise-based monitoring and imaging of aseismic transient deformation induced by the 2006 Basel reservoir stimulation , 2015 .

[10]  Friedemann Wenzel,et al.  Seismogenic index and magnitude probability of earthquakes induced during reservoir fluid stimulations , 2010 .

[11]  Abhineet Gupta,et al.  Estimating spatially varying event rates with a change point using Bayesian statistics: Application to induced seismicity , 2017 .

[12]  Evelina Trutnevyte,et al.  Ensuring diversity of national energy scenarios: Bottom-up energy system model with Modeling to Generate Alternatives , 2017 .

[13]  Mike Pearson,et al.  Visualizing Uncertainty About the Future , 2022 .

[14]  Friedemann Wenzel,et al.  Probability of earthquake occurrence and magnitude estimation in the post shut-in phase of geothermal projects , 2011, Journal of Seismology.

[15]  Yosihiko Ogata,et al.  Statistical Models for Earthquake Occurrences and Residual Analysis for Point Processes , 1988 .

[16]  Valentin Gischig,et al.  The importance of earthquake interactions for injection‐induced seismicity: Retrospective modeling of the Basel Enhanced Geothermal System , 2016 .

[17]  A. Kiureghian,et al.  Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? , 2009 .

[18]  Mark D Zoback,et al.  Response to Comment on “How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates?” , 2017, Science Advances.

[19]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Decay rate of fluid-induced seismicity after termination of reservoir stimulations , 2010 .

[20]  Joseph Arvai,et al.  Decision support framework for developing regional energy strategies. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  W. Ellsworth Injection-Induced Earthquakes , 2013, Science.

[22]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[23]  Arnaud Mignan Static behaviour of induced seismicity , 2015 .

[24]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Building Robust Models to Forecast the Induced Seismicity Related to Geothermal Reservoir Enhancement , 2012 .

[25]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Potential of ambient seismic noise techniques to monitor the St. Gallen geothermal site (Switzerland) , 2015 .

[26]  Miriah D. Meyer,et al.  Information visualisation for science and policy: engaging users and avoiding bias. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[27]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Statistical Method for Early Detection of Changes in Seismic Rate Associated with Wastewater Injections , 2015 .

[28]  Susan Petty,et al.  Improving Geothermal Project Economics with Multi-zone Stimulation: Results from the Newberry Volcano EGS Demonstration , 2013 .

[29]  J. Douglas Zechar,et al.  Validating induced seismicity forecast models—Induced Seismicity Test Bench , 2016, 1609.02793.

[30]  Austin A. Holland,et al.  Earthquakes Triggered by Hydraulic Fracturing in South‐Central Oklahoma , 2013 .

[31]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Geomechanical modeling of induced seismicity source parameters and implications for seismic hazard assessment , 2013 .

[32]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Inter event times of fluid induced earthquakes suggest their Poisson nature , 2011 .

[33]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Bayesian Treatment of Induced Seismicity in Probabilistic Seismic‐Hazard Analysis , 2016 .

[34]  Morgan T. Page,et al.  Induced earthquake magnitudes are as large as (statistically) expected , 2015 .

[35]  Hans-Peter Harjes,et al.  Source parameters of injection-induced microearthquakes at 9 km depth at the KTB Deep Drilling site, Germany , 1998, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[36]  Serge A. Shapiro,et al.  Seismotectonic state of reservoirs inferred from magnitude distributions of fluid-induced seismicity , 2012, Journal of Seismology.

[37]  H.Philippe Bodmer Beiträge zur Geothermie der Schweiz , 1982 .

[38]  Markus Häring,et al.  Characterisation of the Basel 1 enhanced geothermal system , 2008 .

[39]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  A Bayesian Approach for Assessing Seismic Transitions Associated with Wastewater Injections , 2016 .

[40]  Valentina Ferretti,et al.  Key challenges and meta-choices in designing and applying multi-criteria spatial decision support systems , 2016, Decis. Support Syst..

[41]  Susan Petty,et al.  Results from Newberry Volcano EGS Demonstration, 2010–2014 , 2016 .

[42]  Lisa V. Block,et al.  Deep-Injection and Closely Monitored Induced Seismicity at Paradox Valley, Colorado , 2005 .

[43]  Michel Jaboyedoff,et al.  Prototype of a Web-based Participative Decision Support Platform in Natural Hazards and Risk Management , 2015, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[44]  D Giardini,et al.  Induced seismicity closed-form traffic light system for actuarial decision-making during deep fluid injections , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[45]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Tailor-made risk governance for induced seismicity of geothermal energy projects: An application to Switzerland , 2017 .

[46]  Kamran Sedig,et al.  Human-information interaction: An emerging focus for educational cognitive tools , 2011 .

[47]  Stefan Wiemer,et al.  Statistical analysis of the induced Basel 2006 earthquake sequence: introducing a probability-based monitoring approach for Enhanced Geothermal Systems , 2011 .

[48]  Ivan G. Wong,et al.  Protocol for Addressing Induced Seismicity Associated with Enhanced Geothermal Systems , 2012 .

[49]  Michael Stauffacher,et al.  Communicating Low‐Probability High‐Consequence Risk, Uncertainty and Expert Confidence: Induced Seismicity of Deep Geothermal Energy and Shale Gas , 2018, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[50]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  A method to evaluate the usability of interactive climate change impact decision aids , 2014, Climatic Change.

[51]  Feng Mao,et al.  Environmental data visualisation for non-scientific contexts: Literature review and design framework , 2016, Environ. Model. Softw..

[52]  A. Mignan Modeling aftershocks as a stretched exponential relaxation , 2015, 1510.01180.

[53]  Nicholas Deichmann,et al.  High-precision relocation and focal mechanism of the injection-induced seismicity at the Basel EGS , 2014 .