Psychological Detachment from Work during Nonwork Time and Employee Well-Being: The Role of Leader’s Detachment

Abstract Research has shown that psychological detachment from work during nonwork time is an important recovery experience and is crucial for employee well-being. Integrating research on job-stress recovery with research on leadership and employee mental health and well-being, this study examines how a leader’s psychological detachment from work during nonwork time directly relates to subordinate psychological detachment from work and indirectly to employee exhaustion and need for recovery. Based on self-report data from 137 employees and their supervisors, this study revealed that leader psychological detachment was related to subordinate psychological detachment and that leader psychological detachment was indirectly related to low subordinate exhaustion and low subordinate need for recovery, also when controlling for negative affectivity and leader-member-exchange. Overall, this study demonstrates that leaders might have an impact on subordinate strain symptoms not only via leadership behavior at work but also via detachment processes during leisure time. These findings suggest that employee recovery processes might not only be regarded as an individual phenomenon, but could be seen as embedded in the larger organizational context.

[1]  Kara A. Arnold Transformational Leadership and Employee Psychological Well-Being: A Review and Directions for Future Research , 2017, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[2]  C. Binnewies,et al.  The role of partners for employees' recovery during the weekend , 2012 .

[3]  S. Jex,et al.  Relationships between work-home segmentation and psychological detachment from work: the role of communication technology use at home. , 2011, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[4]  Verena C. Haun,et al.  Being mindful at work and at home: Buffering effects in the stressor–detachment model , 2018 .

[5]  Christopher M. Barnes,et al.  “You Wouldn’t Like Me When I’m Sleepy”: Leaders’ Sleep, Daily Abusive Supervision, and Work Unit Engagement , 2014 .

[6]  A. Nienhaus,et al.  Job-related resources, leader–member exchange and well-being – a longitudinal study , 2016 .

[7]  K. Schmidt,et al.  Sleep quality and self-control capacity as protective resources in the daily emotional labor process: results from two diary studies. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[8]  Charles Calderwood,et al.  Better together? Examining profiles of employee recovery experiences. , 2016, The Journal of applied psychology.

[9]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  M. van Veldhoven,et al.  Measurement quality and validity of the “need for recovery scale” , 2003, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[11]  A. Bandura Social learning theory , 1977 .

[12]  M. Westman Stress and Strain Crossover , 2001 .

[13]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Job stressors, emotional exhaustion, and need for recovery: A multi-source study on the benefits of psychological detachment , 2010 .

[14]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. , 2007, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[15]  G. Graen,et al.  Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective , 1995 .

[16]  Birgit Schyns Überprüfung einer deutschsprachigen Skala zum Leader-Member-Exchange-Ansatz , 2002 .

[17]  C. Binnewies,et al.  Setting a good example: supervisors as work-life-friendly role models within the context of boundary management. , 2015, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[18]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model of burnout. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Maureen L. Ambrose,et al.  Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach. , 2013, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  J. Hüffmeier,et al.  Leadership, followers' mental health and job performance in organizations: A comprehensive meta‐analysis from an occupational health perspective , 2017 .

[21]  A. Bakker,et al.  Positive Experiences at Work and Daily Recovery: Effects on Couple’s Well-Being , 2018 .

[22]  C. Niessen,et al.  Managers as Role Models for Health: Moderators of the Relationship of Transformational Leadership With Employee Exhaustion and Cynicism , 2017, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[23]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[24]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Recovery from job stress: The stressor‐detachment model as an integrative framework , 2015 .

[25]  D Eden,et al.  Relief from job stressors and burnout: reserve service as a respite. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[26]  Johannes Wendsche,et al.  A Meta-Analysis on Antecedents and Outcomes of Detachment from Work , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[27]  T. Meijman Psychological Aspects of Workload , 1998 .

[28]  A. Bakker,et al.  The job demands-resources model : state of the art , 2007 .

[29]  A. Shirom,et al.  On the nature of burnout-insomnia relationships: a prospective study of employed adults. , 2008, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[30]  C. Niessen,et al.  How Managers Respond to Exhausted Employees , 2016 .

[31]  Abraham Carmeli,et al.  Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work , 2009 .

[32]  S. Sonnentag,et al.  Workplace conflict and employee well‐being: The moderating role of detachment from work during off‐job time , 2013 .

[33]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Advances in Recovery Research: What Have We Learned? What Should Be Done Next? , 2017, Journal of occupational health psychology.

[34]  James G. Field,et al.  Recovery from work-related effort: A meta-analysis , 2018 .

[35]  Sabine Sonnentag,et al.  Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment. , 2006, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[36]  H. Cooper,et al.  The happy personality: a meta-analysis of 137 personality traits and subjective well-being. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  A. McDowall,et al.  Voluntary Work‐Related Technology Use During Non‐Work Time: A Narrative Synthesis of Empirical Research and Research Agenda , 2018 .