Decentralized Monitoring of Dynamic Processes Based on Dynamic Feature Selection and Informative Fault Pattern Dissimilarity

Although decentralized modeling has been widely employed in monitoring large-scale processes, the dynamic property in process data is rarely investigated. Meanwhile, fault diagnosis in a way similar to pattern recognition is still challenging. To handle these issues, a dynamic decentralized fault detection and diagnosis framework based on dynamic feature selection and informative fault pattern (IFP) dissimilarity is presented. The proposed method accounts explicitly for the dynamic property in process data, while handling the challenging fault diagnosis task at the same time. First, a dynamic feature selection method is proposed to interpret the dynamic relations through characterizing the auto- and cross-correlation for each variable individually. As a consequence, multiblocks are derived for decentralized modeling and monitoring purposes. Second, a novel classification-based fault diagnosis approach on the basis of the dissimilarity analysis and filtered monitoring statistics (termed as IFP) is formulated. This sort of method can be feasible even in a condition that the training samples for each reference fault class are insufficient and also overlapped with each other. Finally, the salient performance in terms of fault detection and recognition capabilities that can be achieved is validated by two simulated examples. The comparisons clearly demonstrate the superiority and feasibility of the proposed monitoring scheme.

[1]  Yingwei Zhang,et al.  Monitoring of time-varying processes using kernel independent component analysis , 2013 .

[2]  Jie Yu,et al.  A quality relevant non‐Gaussian latent subspace projection method for chemical process monitoring and fault detection , 2014 .

[3]  Torsten Jeinsch,et al.  Quality-Related Fault Detection in Industrial Multimode Dynamic Processes , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Yi Cao,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Process Monitoring Using Canonical Variate Analysis and Kernel Density Estimations , 2009 .

[5]  Yu Song,et al.  Distributed Statistical Process Monitoring Based on Four-Subspace Construction and Bayesian Inference , 2013 .

[6]  Hector Budman,et al.  Fault detection, identification and diagnosis using CUSUM based PCA , 2011 .

[7]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Statistical process monitoring: basics and beyond , 2003 .

[8]  A. Negiz,et al.  Statistical monitoring of multivariable dynamic processes with state-space models , 1997 .

[9]  Gang Rong,et al.  Fault diagnosis by Locality Preserving Discriminant Analysis and its kernel variation , 2013, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  Donghua Zhou,et al.  A New Method of Dynamic Latent-Variable Modeling for Process Monitoring , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Steven X. Ding,et al.  A Review on Basic Data-Driven Approaches for Industrial Process Monitoring , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[12]  Furong Gao,et al.  Review of Recent Research on Data-Based Process Monitoring , 2013 .

[13]  Peng Xu,et al.  Decentralized fault detection and diagnosis via sparse PCA based decomposition and Maximum Entropy decision fusion , 2012 .

[14]  Yew Seng Ng,et al.  Evaluation of decision fusion strategies for effective collaboration among heterogeneous fault diagnostic methods , 2011, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  ChangKyoo Yoo,et al.  Statistical monitoring of dynamic processes based on dynamic independent component analysis , 2004 .

[16]  E. F. Vogel,et al.  A plant-wide industrial process control problem , 1993 .

[17]  Manabu Kano,et al.  Statistical process monitoring based on dissimilarity of process data , 2002 .

[18]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Data-Driven Control and Process Monitoring for Industrial Applications—Part I , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  Fuli Wang,et al.  Nonlinear process monitoring based on kernel dissimilarity analysis , 2009 .

[20]  Hiromasa Kaneko,et al.  A new process variable and dynamics selection method based on a genetic algorithm‐based wavelength selection method , 2012 .

[21]  Zhi-huan Song,et al.  Distributed PCA Model for Plant-Wide Process Monitoring , 2013 .

[22]  Dale E. Seborg,et al.  Pattern Matching in Multivariate Time Series Databases Using a Moving-Window Approach , 2002 .

[23]  S. Joe Qin,et al.  Reconstruction-based Contribution for Process Monitoring , 2008 .

[24]  Qiang Liu,et al.  Multiblock Concurrent PLS for Decentralized Monitoring of Continuous Annealing Processes , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[25]  Huijun Gao,et al.  Data-Based Techniques Focused on Modern Industry: An Overview , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[26]  Zhiqiang Ge,et al.  Nonlinear process monitoring based on linear subspace and Bayesian inference , 2010 .

[27]  Koichi Fujiwara,et al.  Development of correlation-based pattern recognition algorithm and adaptive soft-sensor design , 2012 .

[28]  Jin Wang,et al.  Multivariate Statistical Process Monitoring Based on Statistics Pattern Analysis , 2010 .

[29]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Fault Detection and Diagnosis in Industrial Systems , 2001 .

[30]  Si-Zhao Joe Qin,et al.  Survey on data-driven industrial process monitoring and diagnosis , 2012, Annu. Rev. Control..

[31]  Hong Zhou,et al.  Decentralized Fault Diagnosis of Large-Scale Processes Using Multiblock Kernel Partial Least Squares , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[32]  Zhiqiang Ge,et al.  HMM-Driven Robust Probabilistic Principal Component Analyzer for Dynamic Process Fault Classification , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[33]  Okyay Kaynak,et al.  Improved PLS Focused on Key-Performance-Indicator-Related Fault Diagnosis , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[34]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Disturbance detection and isolation by dynamic principal component analysis , 1995 .

[35]  Marios M. Polycarpou,et al.  Distributed Fault Diagnosis With Overlapping Decompositions: An Adaptive Approximation Approach , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.