Estimation Issues Associated with Time-Series—Cross-Section Analysis in Criminology

In this paper we offer a relatively comprehensive introduction to estimation issues associated with time-series— cross-section analysis in criminology. We divide the estimation issues into two categories: (1) those that have received a fair amount of attention in the literature and (2) those that have not. Issues that have received attention are heterogeneity, autocorrelation, panel heteroskedasticity, nonstationarity, and unit-specific trends. Issues that have not received much attention are spatial autocorrelation and contemporaneous correlation. Using county-level data from the state of California, focusing in particular on the crimes of assault, robbery, and burglary, we control for the first set of estimation problems, then we explore the effects of the latter set. We conclude that contemporaneous correlation deserves more attention than spatial autocorrelation. Also, we found that assault is more sensitive to the estimation issues raised than either robbery or burglary.

[1]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Estimating Long-Run Relationships From Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels , 1995 .

[2]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  A deterrence study of the death penalty in Illinois, 1933–1980 , 1984 .

[3]  William C. Bailey,et al.  Poverty, Inequality, and City Homicide Rates: Some Not So Unexpected Findings , 1984 .

[4]  D. Wayne Osgood,et al.  SOCIAL DISORGANIZATION OUTSIDE THE METROPOLIS: AN ANALYSIS OF RURAL YOUTH VIOLENCE* , 2000 .

[5]  Robert H. Langworthy Do stings control crime? An evaluation of a police fencing operation , 1989 .

[6]  R. Sampson,et al.  Community Structure and Crime: Testing Social-Disorganization Theory , 1989, American Journal of Sociology.

[7]  Augustine J. Kposowa,et al.  Reassessing the Structural Covariates of U.S. Homicide Rates: A County Level Study , 1993 .

[8]  Barbara D. Warner,et al.  Local Social Ties in a Community and Crime Model: Questioning the Systemic Nature of Informal Social Control , 1997 .

[9]  Thomas B. Marvell,et al.  The Lethal Effects of Three‐Strikes Laws , 2001, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[10]  Robert Nash Parker,et al.  Type of Homicide and Variation in Regional Rates , 1980 .

[11]  Darrell J. Steffensmeier,et al.  Youth, Underemployment, and Property Crime: Differential Effects of Job Availability and Job Quality on Juvenile and Young Adult Arrest Rates , 1989 .

[12]  Christopher Cornwell,et al.  Estimating the Economic Model of Crime with Panel Data , 1994 .

[13]  T. Pratt,et al.  Social support and homicide: a cross-national test of an emerging criminological theory , 2002 .

[14]  Robert D. Baller,et al.  STRUCTURAL COVARIATES OF U.S. COUNTY HOMICIDE RATES: INCORPORATING SPATIAL EFFECTS* , 2001 .

[15]  Nathaniel Beck,et al.  Nuisance vs. Substance: Specifying and Estimating Time-Series-Cross-Section Models , 1996, Political Analysis.

[16]  James A. Stimson Regression in Space and Time: A Statistical Essay , 1985 .

[17]  Ronald C. Kessler,et al.  Linear Panel Analysis: Models of Quantitative Change. , 1984 .

[18]  S. Bushway,et al.  ON THE USE OF PANEL RESEARCH DESIGNS AND RANDOM EFFECTS MODELS TO INVESTIGATE STATIC AND DYNAMIC THEORIES OF CRIMINAL OFFENDING , 1999 .

[19]  Llad Phillips,et al.  Crime Control in California , 1975, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[20]  Thomas B. Marvell,et al.  THE IMPACT OF ENHANCED PRISON TERMS FOR FELONIES COMMITTED WITH GUNS , 1995 .

[21]  Darrell J. Steffensmeier,et al.  The Differing Effects of Economic Inequality on Black and White Rates of Violence , 1992 .

[22]  V. Mathur,et al.  Economics of Crime: An Investigation of the Deterrent Hypothesis for Urban Areas , 1978 .

[23]  Todd L. Cherry Unobserved heterogeneity bias when estimating the economic model of crime , 1999 .

[24]  Joanna M. Shepherd Fear of the First Strike: The Full Deterrent Effect of California’s Two‐ and Three‐Strikes Legislation , 2002, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[25]  A. Gillis So Long as They Both Shall Live: Marital Dissolution and the Decline of Domestic Homicide in France, 1852-1909 , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Richard Fowles,et al.  WAGE INEQUALITY AND CRIMINAL ACTIVITY: AN EXTREME BOUNDS ANALYSIS FOR THE UNITED STATES, 1975–1990* , 1996 .

[27]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics , 1980 .

[28]  Donald Robertson,et al.  Some strange properties of panel data estimators , 1992 .

[29]  F. C. Mencken,et al.  Murder, Nonnegligent Manslaughter, and Spatial Autocorrelation in Mid-South Counties , 1999 .

[30]  Kirk R. Williams,et al.  The Social Production of Criminal Homicide: A Comparative Study of Disaggregated Rates in American Cities , 1988 .

[31]  P. Doreian Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data , 1980 .

[32]  J. Defronzo,et al.  The Truly Disadvantaged, Public Assistance, and Crime , 1998 .

[33]  John Hagan,et al.  Crime and Inequality , 1996 .

[34]  Steven Stack,et al.  Income Inequality and Property Crime. A Cross-National Analysis of Relative Deprivation Theory , 1984 .

[35]  Rosemary A. Roberts,et al.  The Relationship among Sums of Squares, Correlation Coefficients, and Suppression , 1997 .

[36]  H. Theil Introduction to econometrics , 1978 .

[37]  A. Kposowa,et al.  Reassessing the structural covariates of violent and property crimes in the USA : a county level analysis , 1995 .

[38]  Alex R. Piquero,et al.  Testing for the Equality of Maximum-Likelihood Regression Coefficients Between Two Independent Equations , 1998 .

[39]  Jiang Yu,et al.  THE CERTAINTY OF PUNISHMENT: A REFERENCE GROUP EFFECT AND ITS FUNCTIONAL FORM , 1993 .

[40]  Cheng Hsiao,et al.  Analysis of Panel Data , 1987 .

[41]  F. Ozkan,et al.  Macroeconomic Policies of Developed Democracies. , 2003 .

[42]  D. Osgood Poisson-Based Regression Analysis of Aggregate Crime Rates , 2000 .

[43]  P. Doreian Estimating Linear Models with Spatially Distributed Data , 1981 .

[44]  Nathaniel N. Beck Have We Learned in the Past Few Years , 2001 .

[45]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Deterrent Effects of the Police on Crime: A Replication and Theoretical Extension , 1988 .

[46]  M. Hashem Pesaran,et al.  Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels , 1999 .

[47]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[48]  Mitchell B. Chamlin Conflict theory and police killings , 1989 .

[49]  Tomislav Victor Kovandzic,et al.  The structural covariates of urban homicide: reassessing the impact of income inequality and poverty in the post-Reagan era , 1998 .

[50]  Luc Anselin,et al.  Interactive Techniques and Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis , 1996 .

[51]  Gene Swimmer THE RELATIONSHIP OF POLICE AND CRIME , 1974 .

[52]  Lillian Cohen,et al.  Statistical Methods for Social Scientists. , 1954 .

[53]  Richard Lempert Strategies of Research Design in the Legal Impact Study: The Control of Plausible Rival Hypotheses , 1966 .

[54]  Thomas F. Pogue,et al.  Effect of Police Expenditures on Crime Rates: Some Evidence , 1975 .

[55]  Mitchell B. Chamlin,et al.  SOCIAL ALTRUISM AND CRIME , 1997 .

[56]  Ronald C. Kessler,et al.  The Effect of Arrests on Crime: A Multivariate Panel Analysis , 1982 .

[57]  Fred Phillips,et al.  Linear Panel Analysis: Models of Quantitative Change. , 1982 .

[58]  W. Enders Applied Econometric Time Series , 1994 .

[59]  C. Clogg,et al.  Statistical Methods for Comparing Regression Coefficients Between Models , 1995, American Journal of Sociology.

[60]  Thomas B. Marvell,et al.  SPECIFICATION PROBLEMS, POLICE LEVELS, AND CRIME RATES* , 1996 .

[61]  Thomas A. Petee,et al.  Modeling Rural Violent Crime Rates: A Test of Social Disorganization Theory , 1993 .

[62]  W. Wilson The Truly Disadvantaged , 1987 .

[63]  A. Lizotte,et al.  The rate of surplus value and crime. A theoretical and empirical examination of Marxian economic theory and criminology , 1994 .

[64]  Kenneth C. Land,et al.  UNEMPLOYMENT AND CRIME RATES IN THE POST- WORLD WAR II UNITED STATES: A THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS , 1985 .

[65]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Unemployment and Crime: Toward Resolving the Paradox , 1998 .

[66]  Jonathan N. Katz,et al.  What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data , 1995, American Political Science Review.

[67]  D. Campbell,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENT Al DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH , 2012 .