Three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound assessment of plaque volume after successful atherectomy.

The primary purpose of directional coronary atherectomy is the removal of intraluminal plaque. Angiography allows assessment of residual lumen narrowing but is limited in the assessment of residual plaque burden. Intravascular ultrasound has proven useful in assessing plaque size, but current use has been limited to a single, representative cross-sectional image rather than an evaluation of the entire plaque volume. To determine the volume of residual plaque after angiographically successful directional coronary atherectomy ( < or = 20% residual stenosis), we performed intravascular ultrasound in 19 patients before and after atherectomy. Only coronary lesions optimal for three-dimensional analysis (a single, discrete stenosis in a nontortuous, noncalcified native coronary artery) were selected. A 2.9F sheath-design intravascular ultrasound catheter with a motorized pullback device was used in all patients. The cross-sectional area of the artery (defined by the medial-adventitia border), the lumen, and the plaque were measured at 1 mm intervals over a 15 to 20 mm segment, which included the target lesion and a proximal reference segment (n = 362 cross-sections), before and after atherectomy. The volumes of the artery, vessel lumen, or plaque were calculated with a modified Simpson's equation and compared with standard area measurements at the point of maximal stenosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[1]  P. Fitzgerald,et al.  Mechanisms and outcomes of angioplasty and atherectomy assessed by intravascular ultrasound imaging , 1993, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[2]  C J Slager,et al.  Three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images. Rationale, approaches, problems, and directions. , 1994, Circulation.

[3]  J. Hermiller,et al.  In vivo validation of compensatory enlargement of atherosclerotic coronary arteries. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  J. Isner,et al.  Combination Balloon‐Ultrasound Imaging Catheter for Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty: Validation of Imaging, Analysis of Recoil, and Identification of Plaque Fracture , 1991, Circulation.

[5]  J. Cabrera,et al.  Intracoronary ultrasound assessment of directional coronary atherectomy: immediate and follow-up findings. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  J. Hodgson,et al.  Mechanisms of angiographically successful directional coronary atherectomy: evaluation by intracoronary ultrasound and comparison with transluminal coronary angioplasty. , 1993, American heart journal.

[7]  B. Waller Anatomy, histology, and pathology of the major epicardial coronary arteries relevant to echocardiographic imaging techniques. , 1989, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[8]  P. Douek,et al.  The contribution of tissue removal to lumen improvement after directional coronary atherectomy. , 1994, The American journal of cardiology.

[9]  D. Baim,et al.  Directional coronary atherectomy: how much lumen enlargement is optimal? , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  M. Selmon,et al.  Directional atherectomy. New approaches for treatment of obstructive coronary and peripheral vascular disease. , 1990, Circulation.

[11]  C T Lancée,et al.  Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: an in vitro study. , 1989, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[12]  C. Zarins,et al.  Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries. , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  J. Weiss,et al.  Accuracy of Volume Determination by Two‐dimensional Echocardiography: Defining Requirements Under Controlled Conditions in the Ejecting Canine Left Ventricle , 1983, Circulation.

[14]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Quantitative coronary arteriography: equipment and technical requirements , 1993 .

[15]  R. Califf,et al.  A Comparison of Directional Atherectomy with Coronary Angioplasty in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease , 1993 .

[16]  J. Isner,et al.  How Does Angioplasy Work?: Serial Analysis of Human Iliac Arteries Using Intravascular Ultrasound , 1992, Circulation.

[17]  R D Safian,et al.  Restenosis After Directional Coronary Atherectomy Effects of Luminal Diameter and Deep Wall Excision , 1992, Circulation.

[18]  W. R. Castaneda-Zuniga,et al.  How does angioplasty work , 1982 .

[19]  Rodney A. White How does angioplasty work? Serial analysis of human iliac arteries using intravascular ultrasound: Losordo DW, Rosenfield K, Pieczek A, Baker K, Harding M, Isner JM. Circulation 1992;86:1845-58 , 1994 .

[20]  A J Tajik,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound imaging: in vitro validation and pathologic correlation. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[21]  Johan H. C. Reiber,et al.  Advances in Quantitative Coronary Arteriography , 1993, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[22]  J. Isner,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Reconstruction of Human Coronary and Peripheral Arteries From Images Recorded During Two‐Dimensional Intravascular Ultrasound Examination , 1991, Circulation.

[23]  I. Palacios,et al.  Early decrease in minimal luminal diameter after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty predicts late restenosis. , 1993, The American journal of cardiology.

[24]  T. Porter,et al.  Intravascular ultrasound study of angiographically mildly diseased coronary arteries. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.