Impact of filler size and distribution on roughness and wear of resin composite after simulated toothbrushing

1DDS, MSc, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil. 2DDS, MSc, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil. 3DDS, MSc, PhD, Full Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil. 4DDS, MSc, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials and Endodontics, Bauru School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.

[1]  C P Turssi,et al.  Filler features and their effects on wear and degree of conversion of particulate dental resin composites. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[2]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  Microstructure of posterior restorations of composite resin after clinical wear. , 1980, Operative dentistry.

[3]  S. Mitra,et al.  An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. , 2003, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[4]  H. Rezaie,et al.  Investigation of mechanical properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composite resins containing various mass fractions of silica nanoparticles. , 2010, Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists.

[5]  Martina Meinke,et al.  Optical properties of dental restorative materials in the wavelength range 400 to 700 nm for the simulation of color perception. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[6]  G W Marshall,et al.  Mechanical properties of mineralized collagen fibrils as influenced by demineralization. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.

[7]  Bart Van Meerbeek,et al.  Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  Fernanda Cristina Pimentel Garcia,et al.  Evaluation of the roughness and mass loss of the flowable composites after simulated toothbrushing abrasion. , 2004, Brazilian oral research.

[9]  M C Serra,et al.  Surface roughness assessment of resin-based materials during brushing preceded by pH-cycling simulations. , 2001, Operative dentistry.

[10]  Anuradha Prakki,et al.  Influence of additives on the properties of Bis-GMA/Bis-GMA analog comonomers and corresponding copolymers. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[11]  Nicholas Davis,et al.  A nanotechnology composite. , 2003, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[12]  Sérgio Kiyoshi Ishikiriama,et al.  Wear and surface roughness of bovine enamel submitted to bleaching. , 2009, The European journal of esthetic dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Esthetic Dentistry.

[13]  J Vreven,et al.  Investigating filler morphology and mechanical properties of new low-shrinkage resin composite types. , 2010, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[14]  I. Sideridou,et al.  Effect of the amount of 3-methacyloxypropyltrimethoxysilane coupling agent on physical properties of dental resin nanocomposites. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  Reinhard Hickel,et al.  Investigations on mechanical behaviour of dental composites , 2009, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[16]  John M Powers,et al.  Properties of a dental resin composite with a spherical inorganic filler. , 2006, Operative dentistry.

[17]  Salah Hasab Mahmoud,et al.  Two-year clinical evaluation of ormocer, nanohybrid and nanofill composite restorative systems in posterior teeth. , 2008, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[18]  E Steven Duke,et al.  Has dentistry moved into the nanotechnology era? , 2003, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[19]  Fernanda Cristina Pimentel Garcia,et al.  Wear resistance of packable resin composites after simulated toothbrushing test. , 2004, Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.].

[20]  Anuradha Prakki,et al.  In vitro wear, surface roughness and hardness of propanal-containing and diacetyl-containing novel composites and copolymers based on bis-GMA analogs. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  Leinfelder Kf,et al.  An in vitro device for predicting clinical wear. , 1989 .

[22]  Paulo Henrique dos Santos,et al.  Comparative study of the surface roughness of Ormocer-based and conventional composites. , 2003, Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB.

[23]  Wolfgang Jacquet,et al.  A prospective randomized clinical trial of one bis-GMA-based and two ormocer-based composite restorative systems in class II cavities: Five-year results. , 2007 .

[24]  R. Lakes,et al.  The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic properties of nano-hybrid composites. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[25]  Anuradha Prakki,et al.  The role of surface sealants in the roughness of composites after a simulated toothbrushing test. , 2009, Journal of dentistry.