Time-Quality Tradeoff of Waiting Strategies for Tutors to Retrieve Relevant Teaching Methods

As more and more undergraduate students act as voluntary tutors to rural pupils after school, there is a growing need for a supporting environment to facilitate adaptive instruction. Among others, a teaching method retrieval system is intended to help tutors find relevant teaching methods for teaching a particular concept. However, teaching methods demanded by tutors might not be in well-organized forms or even unwritten. Thus, the technology of conventional information retrieval cannot be simply applied to retrieve teaching methods. Therefore, we propose to invite experts (teachers) to join the support environment and provide ad hoc teaching methods. Nevertheless, it is difficult for tutors to decide how long they will wait for replies from remote teachers, which is called a due time setting problem. Furthermore, a trade-off inherent in the problem is that an early reply does not necessarily mean a good one. Our idea is to propose an interactive approach to deal with the uncertainty during retrieving teaching methods. In this study, we define this problem and evaluate several waiting strategies. A prototype has been designed and implemented, and experiments have been conducted to evaluate the performance of the four waiting strategies. The results show that waiting strategies have a significant impact on retrieval performance.

[1]  A. Irons,et al.  Enhancing Learning through Formative Assessment and Feedback , 2007 .

[2]  Shian-Shyong Tseng,et al.  A Knowledge-based Approach to Retrieving Teaching Materials for Context-aware Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Walter Willinger,et al.  On unbiased sampling for unstructured peer-to-peer networks , 2009, TNET.

[4]  Chao-Tung Yang,et al.  Wiki-based rapid prototyping for teaching-material design in e-Learning grids , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[5]  John Shawe-Taylor,et al.  Advanced learning algorithms for cross-language patent retrieval and classification , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[6]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Enhancing the Quality of e-Learning in Virtual Learning Communities by Finding Quality Learning Content and Trustworthy Collaborators , 2007, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[7]  W. Bruce Croft,et al.  Hierarchical Language Models for Expert Finding in Enterprise Corpora , 2008, Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools.

[8]  Kazuhisa Miwa,et al.  Construction of a learning environment supporting learners' reflection: A case of information seeking on the Web , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[9]  E. Tsui Technologies for Personal and Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Knowledge Management , 2002 .

[10]  Sumio Fujita Technology survey and invalidity search: A comparative study of different tasks for Japanese patent document retrieval , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[11]  Chung-Hsien Wu,et al.  Semantic segment extraction and matching for Internet FAQ retrieval , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[12]  Ling Liu,et al.  PeerTrust: supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[13]  Yong Yu,et al.  SDQE: towards automatic semantic query optimization in P2P systems , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  M. de Rijke,et al.  A language modeling framework for expert finding , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[15]  Jungi Kim,et al.  Cluster-based patent retrieval , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[16]  Yong Tan,et al.  Evaluation and design of online cooperative feedback mechanisms for reputation management , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[17]  Julie A. Hatcher,et al.  Implementing Service Learning in Higher Education , 1996 .

[18]  Jungyun Seo,et al.  High-performance FAQ retrieval using an automatic clustering method of query logs , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[19]  Dimitrios Gunopulos,et al.  pFusion: A P2P Architecture for Internet-Scale Content-Based Search and Retrieval , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[20]  Stephen J. H. Yang,et al.  A social network-based system for supporting interactive collaboration in knowledge sharing over peer-to-peer network , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Henrik Nottelmann,et al.  Search and browse services for heterogeneous collections with the peer-to-peer network Pepper , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[22]  Kai Hwang,et al.  Gossip-based Reputation Aggregation for Unstructured Peer-to-Peer Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium.

[23]  Dawei Song,et al.  Integrating multiple windows and document features for expert finding , 2009 .

[24]  Chao-Tung Yang,et al.  Using Taxonomic Indexing Trees to Efficiently Retrieve SCORM-compliant Documents in e-Learning Grids , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Javed I. Khan,et al.  Computing with data non-determinism: Wait time management for peer-to-peer systems , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[26]  Gerhard Weikum,et al.  p2pDating: Real life inspired semantic overlay networks for Web search , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..

[27]  Bei Yu,et al.  Efficient semantic-based content search in P2P network , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[28]  Jungyun Seo,et al.  A reliable FAQ retrieval system using a query log classification technique based on latent semantic analysis , 2007, Inf. Process. Manag..