Video Analysis As A Tool For Understanding Science Instruction

Research on science instruction has revealed complex and nontrivial relations between instructional variables – including school system characteristics, teacher cognition and beliefs, teachers’ and students’ activities during instruction and last but not least, learning outcomes. To further investigate these relations, the development of respective models as well as appropriate research designs and methodologies are required. This will allow for tracing effects to the instructional level, shedding light on the well-known gap between teachers’ demands and students’ efforts as well as for the creation of interventions to overcome this gap. To this end, variables of teaching and learning have to be investigated using low- and high-inferent video analyses. Students’ and teachers’ behaviour holds valuable information for identifying cause-effect relations between what happens in the classroom and targeted outcomes.

[1]  James R. Okey,et al.  A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement , 1983 .

[2]  P. Freebody Qualitative Research in Education , 2003 .

[3]  Abbas Tashakkori,et al.  Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1998 .

[4]  Lorin W. Anderson,et al.  Instruction and Time‐on‐ Task: a Review , 1981 .

[5]  William D. Schafer,et al.  Reliability. ERIC Digest. , 2001 .

[6]  H. Walberg,et al.  Toward a Knowledge Base for School Learning , 1993 .

[7]  D. K. Meyer,et al.  Studying and Understanding the Instructional Contexts of Classrooms: Using our Past to Forge our Future , 2000 .

[8]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[9]  S. Krauss,et al.  Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress , 2010 .

[10]  Hans E. Fischer Developing standards in research on science education : the ESERA summer school 2004 , 2005 .

[11]  P. Broek,et al.  Cognitive Processes in Comprehension of Science Texts : The Role of Co-Activation in Confronting Misconceptions , 2008 .

[12]  L. Delpit The Silenced Dialogue: Power and Pedagogy in Educating Other People's Children , 1988 .

[13]  U. Oevermann,et al.  Die Methodologie einer „objektiven Hermeneutik“ , 1983 .

[14]  R. Duschl Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals , 2008 .

[15]  M. Tatto Education Reform and State Power in México: The Paradoxes of Decentralization , 1999, Comparative Education Review.

[16]  Norman G. Lederman,et al.  Knowledge structures in the preservice science teacher: Sources, development, interactions, and relationships to teaching , 1995 .

[17]  Kurt Reusser,et al.  Unterrichtsskripts im schweizerischen und im deutschen Mathematikunterricht , 2003 .

[18]  J. Stigler,et al.  Understanding and Improving Classroom Mathematics Instruction: An Overview of the TIMSS Video Study , 1997 .

[19]  H. Mitzel,et al.  Encyclopedia of educational research , 1982 .

[20]  Eduardo Fleury Mortimer,et al.  Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms , 2003 .

[21]  Maher Z. Hashweh Effects of science teachers' epistemological beliefs in teaching , 1996 .

[22]  D. McCurry Technology for Critical Pedagogy: Beyond Self-Reflection with Video , 2000 .

[23]  J. Richardson Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[24]  Frank H. Farley,et al.  Psychology and education : the state of the union , 1981 .

[25]  Hans E. Fischer,et al.  Evaluation of a Theory of Instructional Sequences for Physics Instruction , 2010 .

[26]  R. Bogdan Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[27]  R. Linn,et al.  Qualitative methods in research on teaching , 1985 .

[28]  J. Cummins,et al.  The light in their eyes : creating multicultural learning communities , 2001 .

[29]  Barbara Rosenstein,et al.  Video Use in Social Science Research and Program Evaluation , 2002 .

[30]  Alija Kulenović,et al.  Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing , 1999 .

[31]  Barry J. Fraser,et al.  A Multilevel Analysis of Learning Environments and Student Attitudes , 1997 .

[32]  Thomas R. Lindlof Qualitative Communication Research Methods , 1994 .

[33]  F. Weinert,et al.  Entwicklung im Grundschulalter , 1997 .

[34]  Tsung-Hau Jen,et al.  Policy Evaluation on Technology Integrated Instructions of Junior High Math and Science Teaching in Taiwan , 2007 .

[35]  N. Smelser,et al.  International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences , 2001 .

[36]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Applying multilevel modelling to content analysis data: Methodological issues in the study of role assignment in asynchronous discussion groups , 2007 .

[37]  H. Soeffner,et al.  Interpretative Verfahren in den Sozial- und Textwissenschaften , 1979 .

[38]  Kurt Reusser,et al.  Teaching patterns and learning quality in Swiss and German mathematics lessons , 2009 .

[39]  M. Prenzel,et al.  Gelegenheitsstrukturen beim Klassengespräch und ihre Bedeutung für die Lernmotivation. Videoanalysen in Kombination mit Schülerselbsteinschätzungen , 2003 .

[40]  Detlev Leutner,et al.  PISA 2003: Der Bildungsstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland - Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs , 2004 .

[41]  T. Seidel,et al.  Clarity and coherence of lesson goals as a scaffold for student learning , 2005 .

[42]  S. P. Cheung,et al.  Evaluation of the Effects of Medium of Instruction on the Science Learning of Hong Kong Secondary Students: Performance on the Science Achievement Test , 2003 .

[43]  S. Erduran,et al.  Arguing to learn and learning to argue: Case studies of how students' argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge , 2008 .

[44]  Philipp Mayring Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken , 2003 .

[45]  C. Lubienski,et al.  School Sector and Academic Achievement: A Multilevel Analysis of NAEP Mathematics Data , 2006 .

[46]  S. Messick Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of Assessment , 1989 .

[47]  Herbert J. Walberg,et al.  Research on teaching : concepts, findings and implications , 1981 .

[48]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling , 2000 .

[49]  H. Schaumburg Review: Stefan von Aufschnaiter & Manuela Welzel (Eds.) (2001). Nutzung von Videodaten zur Untersuchung von Lehr-Lernprozessen. Aktuelle Methoden empirischer pädagogischer Forschung [Use of Video Data to Examine Teaching and Learning Processes. New Methods in Empirical Educational Research] , 2002 .

[50]  D. Schoen Educating the reflective practitioner , 1987 .

[51]  L. Shulman Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching , 1986 .

[52]  Karen B. Givvin,et al.  Teaching Mathematics in Seven Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study , 2003 .

[53]  K. Peterson,et al.  Science students' role-specific self-concept: Course, success, and gender , 1980 .

[54]  B. Berg Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences , 1989 .

[55]  J. Stigler,et al.  The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings from an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth-Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. A Research and Development Report. , 1999 .

[56]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[57]  Cora J. M. Maas,et al.  Robustness issues in multilevel regression analysis , 2004 .

[58]  Anton Béguin Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education , 2009 .

[59]  Andreas Helmke,et al.  Unterrichtsqualität : erfassen, bewerten, verbessern , 2007 .

[60]  A. Bryman,et al.  Handbook of data analysis , 2004 .

[61]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[62]  Ronald D. Anderson A consolidation and appraisal of science meta-analyses , 1983 .

[63]  D. Weiss,et al.  Interrater reliability and agreement. , 2000 .

[64]  Robert H. Ennis Critical thinking assessment , 1993 .

[65]  L. Poundie Burstein The Multilevel Effects of Background on Science Achievement: A Cross-National Comparison. , 1980 .

[66]  J. Hattie,et al.  Syntheses of educational productivity research , 1987 .

[67]  S. Krauss,et al.  Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Content Knowledge of Secondary Mathematics Teachers. , 2008 .

[68]  L. Delpit Other People's Children: Cultural Conflict in the Classroom , 1995 .

[69]  Frederick Erickson Audiovisual Records as a Primary Data Source , 1982 .

[70]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[71]  Penelope L. Peterson,et al.  Teachers' Pedagogical Content Beliefs in Mathematics , 1989 .

[72]  David Kaplan,et al.  The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences , 2004 .

[73]  B. Glaser Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis: Emergence Vs. Forcing , 1992 .

[74]  Onno De Jong,et al.  Exploring the Development of Student Teachers’ PCK of the Multiple Meanings of Chemistry Topics , 2004 .

[75]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[76]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Measures of association for cross classifications , 1979 .

[77]  M. Wittrock Handbook of research on teaching , 1986 .

[78]  H. Walberg,et al.  What Influences Learning? A Content Analysis of Review Literature , 1990 .

[79]  J. Stigler,et al.  Integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches to the analysis of video data on classroom teaching , 1999 .

[80]  Hilary Hollingsworth,et al.  Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth , 2002 .

[81]  A. Grimshaw,et al.  Sound-Image Data Records for Research on Social Interaction , 1982 .

[82]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[83]  Manfred Prenzel,et al.  How to run a video study : technical report of the IPN video study , 2005 .

[84]  Valerie J. Caracelli,et al.  Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs , 1989 .

[85]  James W. Stigler,et al.  Teaching Science in Five Countries: Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2006-011. , 2006 .

[86]  E. Stern,et al.  The Nature of Teachers' Pedagogical Content Beliefs Matters for Students' Achievement Gains: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Elementary Mathematics. , 2002 .

[87]  A. Ashtekar Overview and Outlook , 1994, gr-qc/9403038.

[88]  Xiaoxia Ai,et al.  Gender Differences in Growth in Mathematics Achievement: Three-Level Longitudinal and Multilevel Analyses of Individual, Home, and School Influences , 2002 .

[89]  Aldrin E. Sweeney,et al.  The role of personal practice theories in the professional development of a beginning high school chemistry teacher , 2001 .

[90]  D. Leutner,et al.  Framework for Empirical Research on Science Teaching and Learning , 2005 .

[91]  Kurt Reusser,et al.  Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem , 2009 .

[92]  D. Young A Multilevel Analysis of Science and Mathematics Achievement. , 1997 .

[93]  Triangulation als Kombination qualitativer und quantitativer Forschung , 1998 .

[94]  M. Clarke The Dysfunctions of the Theory/ Practice Discourse , 1994 .

[95]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[96]  F. Oser,et al.  Effective and Responsible Teaching: The New Synthesis. , 1992 .

[97]  Franz Emanuel Weinert,et al.  Quality of instruction and achievement outcomes , 1989 .

[98]  L. Shulman Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform , 1987 .