Quantifying Canopy Tree Loss and Gap Recovery in Tropical Forests under Low-Intensity Logging Using VHR Satellite Imagery and Airborne LiDAR

Logging, including selective and illegal activities, is widespread, affecting the carbon cycle and the biodiversity of tropical forests. However, automated approaches using very high resolution (VHR) satellite data (≤1 m spatial resolution) to accurately track these small-scale human disturbances over large and remote areas are not readily available. The main constraint for performing this type of analysis is the lack of spatially accurate tree-scale validation data. In this study, we assessed the potential of VHR satellite imagery to detect canopy tree loss related to selective logging in closed-canopy tropical forests. To do this, we compared the tree loss detection capability of WorldView-2 and GeoEye-1 satellites with airborne LiDAR, which acquired pre- and post-logging data at the Jamari National Forest in the Brazilian Amazon. We found that logging drove changes in canopy height ranging from −5.6 to −42.2 m, with a mean reduction of −23.5 m. A simple LiDAR height difference threshold of −10 m was enough to map 97% of the logged trees. Compared to LiDAR, tree losses can be detected using VHR satellite imagery and a random forest (RF) model with an average precision of 64%, while mapping 60% of the total tree loss. Tree losses associated with large gap openings or tall trees were more successfully detected. In general, the most important remote sensing metrics for the RF model were standard deviation statistics, especially those extracted from the reflectance of the visible bands (R, G, B), and the shadow fraction. While most small canopy gaps closed within ~2 years, larger gaps could still be observed over a longer time. Nevertheless, the use of annual imagery is advised to reach acceptable detectability. Our study shows that VHR satellite imagery has the potential for monitoring the logging in tropical forests and detecting hotspots of natural disturbance with a low cost at the regional scale.

[1]  B. R. Ramesh,et al.  Pan‐tropical prediction of forest structure from the largest trees , 2018, Global Ecology and Biogeography.

[2]  David B. Clark,et al.  Application of merged 1-m and 4-m resolution satellite data to research and management in tropical forests , 2003 .

[3]  A. Contreras-Hermosilla,et al.  The economics of illegal logging and associated trade. , 2008 .

[4]  Virgilio Gómez-Rubio,et al.  Spatial Point Patterns: Methodology and Applications with R , 2016 .

[5]  P. Jones,et al.  Updated high‐resolution grids of monthly climatic observations – the CRU TS3.10 Dataset , 2014 .

[6]  Sam Lawson and Larry MacFaul Illegal Logging and Related Trade: Indicators of the Global Response , 2010 .

[7]  B. Poulter,et al.  Environmental change and the carbon balance of Amazonian forests , 2014, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[8]  M. Keller,et al.  Structural Dynamics of Tropical Moist Forest Gaps , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  A. K. Skidmore,et al.  Free satellite data key to conservation , 2018, Science.

[10]  N. Brokaw,et al.  The definition of treefall gap and its effect on measures of forest dynamics. , 1982 .

[11]  T. E. Martin,et al.  Logging impacts on avian species richness and composition differ across latitudes and foraging and breeding habitat preferences , 2017, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[12]  Robert J. McGaughey,et al.  Monitoring selective logging in western Amazonia with repeat lidar flights , 2014 .

[13]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Multi-temporal analysis of high spatial resolution imagery for disturbance monitoring , 2008 .

[14]  Cibele Hummel do Amaral,et al.  Spectral analysis of amazon canopy phenology during the dry season using a tower hyperspectral camera and modis observations , 2017 .

[15]  M. d'Oliveira,et al.  Estimating forest biomass and identifying low-intensity logging areas using airborne scanning lidar in Antimary State Forest, Acre State, Western Brazilian Amazon , 2012 .

[16]  J. Dalling,et al.  Spatial scale and sampling resolution affect measures of gap disturbance in a lowland tropical forest: implications for understanding forest regeneration and carbon storage , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Cardona Alzate,et al.  Predicción y selección de variables con bosques aleatorios en presencia de variables correlacionadas , 2020 .

[18]  A. Huete,et al.  Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices , 2002 .

[19]  Julien Michel,et al.  Orfeo ToolBox: open source processing of remote sensing images , 2017, Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards.

[20]  T. Stone,et al.  Using multi-temporal satellite data to evaluate selective logging in Para, Brazil , 1998 .

[21]  W. Buermann,et al.  Mapping tropical disturbed forests using multi-decadal 30 m optical satellite imagery , 2019, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[22]  M. Cochrane Fire science for rainforests , 2003, Nature.

[23]  S. Hubbell,et al.  Adult mortality in a low-density tree population using high-resolution remote sensing. , 2017, Ecology.

[24]  J. A. Schell,et al.  Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS , 1973 .

[25]  Hurtado Abril,et al.  Generación de un índice espectro-temporal para la identificación de zonas afectadas por deforestación usando imágenes Landsat. , 2020 .

[26]  A. Zanne,et al.  Selective logging: do rates of forest turnover in stems, species composition and functional traits decrease with time since disturbance? - A 45 year perspective. , 2015, Forest ecology and management.

[27]  David B. Clark,et al.  APPLICATION OF 1-M AND 4-M RESOLUTION SATELLITE DATA TO ECOLOGICAL STUDIES OF TROPICAL RAIN FORESTS , 2004 .

[28]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[29]  D. Clark,et al.  Quantifying mortality of tropical rain forest trees using high-spatial-resolution satellite data , 2004 .

[30]  P. Diggle A Kernel Method for Smoothing Point Process Data , 1985 .

[31]  Nicolas Barbier,et al.  Remote sensing detection of droughts in Amazonian forest canopies. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[32]  David B. Clark,et al.  GETTING TO THE CANOPY: TREE HEIGHT GROWTH IN A NEOTROPICAL RAIN FOREST , 2001 .

[33]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[34]  Julien Radoux,et al.  Bayesian Data Fusion for Adaptable Image Pansharpening , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[35]  B. Hérault,et al.  Environmental control of natural gap size distribution in tropical forests , 2016 .

[36]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  An Object-Based Classification Approach in Mapping Tree Mortality Using High Spatial Resolution Imagery , 2007 .

[37]  G. Powell,et al.  High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[39]  C. Justice,et al.  High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change , 2013, Science.

[40]  Marcos Longo,et al.  El Niño drought increased canopy turnover in Amazon forests. , 2018, The New phytologist.

[41]  M. Keller,et al.  Selective Logging in the Brazilian Amazon , 2005, Science.