Design and development of a virtual anatomic atlas of the human skull for automatic segmentation in computer-assisted surgery, preoperative planning, and navigation

AbstractPurpose Manual segmentation of CT datasets for preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation is a time-consuming procedure. The purpose of this study was to develop an automated segmentation procedure for the facial skeleton based on a virtual anatomic atlas of the skull, to test its practicability, and to evaluate the accuracy of the segmented objects. Materials and methods The atlas skull was created by manually segmenting an unaffected skull CT dataset. For automated segmentation of cases via IPlan cranial (BrainLAB, Germany), the atlas skull underwent projection, controlled deformation, and a facultative threshold segmentation within the individual datasets, of which 16 routine CT (13 pathologies, 3 without) were processed. The variations of the no-threshold versus threshold segmentation results compared to the original were determined. The clinical usability of the results was assessed in a multicentre evaluation. Results Compared to the original dataset, the mean accuracy was $$\le 0.6$$ mm for the threshold segmentation and 0.6–1.4 mm for the no-threshold segmentation. Comparing both methods together, the deviation was $$\le 0.2$$ mm. An isolated no-threshold segmentation of the orbital cavity alone resulted in a mean accuracy of $$\le 0.6$$ mm. With regard to clinical usability, the no-threshold method was clearly preferred, reaching modal scores of “good” to “moderate” in most areas. Limitations were seen in segmenting the TMJ, mandibular fractures, and thin bone in general. Conclusion The feasibility of automated skull segmentation was demonstrated. The virtual anatomic atlas can improve the preprocessing of skull CT scans for computer assisted craniomaxillofacial surgery planning.

[1]  J. Jansen,et al.  Review of biomechanical models used in studying the biomechanics of reconstructed mandibles. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  Aaron Oliker,et al.  Creating a Virtual Surgical Atlas of Craniofacial Procedures: Part I. Three-Dimensional Digital Models of Craniofacial Deformities , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  A Pernozzoli,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a highly accurate algorithm for CT bone contour segmentation. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[4]  Matthias Teschner,et al.  Verification of clinical precision after computer-aided reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial surgery. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[5]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains , 2004, NeuroImage.

[6]  Hans-Christian Hege,et al.  3D Reconstruction of Individual Anatomy from Medical Image Data: Segmentation and Geometry Processing , 2007 .

[7]  H Eufinger,et al.  Individual augmentation of the atrophic mandible based on CAD/CAM-manipulated computed tomography data--in vitro results. , 1994, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[8]  H. Eufinger,et al.  Experimental computer-assisted alloplastic sandwich augmentation of the atrophic mandible. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  Wieslaw L Nowinski,et al.  Automatic model-guided segmentation of the human brain ventricular system from CT images. , 2010, Academic radiology.

[10]  M. Greenberg Globalization of diagnostic dental specialties. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[11]  N. Gellrich,et al.  [Objectivity of therapeutic results following skull base surgery using virtual model analysis]. , 2006, HNO.

[12]  Claudio Pollo,et al.  Atlas-based segmentation of pathological MR brain images using a model of lesion growth , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  J. Schipper,et al.  Objektivierung von Therapieergebnissen in der Schädelbasischirurgie durch virtuelle Modellanalyse , 2006, HNO.

[14]  M. Metzger,et al.  Computer-assisted extracorporeal orbital reconstruction after optic nerve decompression by removal of sphenoid bone. , 2006, Annals of plastic surgery.

[15]  Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman,et al.  Digital three-dimensional image fusion processes for planning and evaluating orthodontics and orthognathic surgery. A systematic review. , 2011, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[16]  Siping Chen,et al.  [Medical image automatic adjusting window and segmentation]. , 2005, Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi.

[17]  N. Gellrich,et al.  [Computer assisted methods in reconstructive and function-preserving orbital surgery. New capabilities of computer assisted preoperative surgical planning (CAPP) and computer assisted surgery (CAS)]. , 2005, HNO.

[18]  W. L. Nowinski,et al.  Modified Talairach Landmarks , 2001, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[19]  A. Louis,et al.  Mehr Mathematik Wagen in der Medizin , 2009 .

[20]  T Lenarz,et al.  Image-guided surgery of the anterior skull base. , 2001, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[21]  Scott D Ganz,et al.  Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors. , 2008, Compendium of continuing education in dentistry.

[22]  Aaron Oliker,et al.  Creating a Virtual Surgical Atlas of Craniofacial Procedures: Part II. Surgical Animations , 2010, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[23]  J. Bier,et al.  Surgical Navigation in Oral Implantology , 2006, Implant dentistry.