On the use of risk-based Shapley values for cost sharing in interplant heat integration programs

The heat exchanger network (HEN) is traditionally used for optimal heat recovery in a single chemical plant, while the multi-plant counterparts have been studied in recent years primarily for the purpose of reaping additional overall energy savings. Since all these works focused primarily upon minimization of the total energy cost, the resulting interplant heat integration arrangements were often infeasible due to the fact that the individual savings are not always acceptable to all participating parties. Although a few studies addressed this cost-sharing issue, the existing methodologies are still not mature enough for realistic applications. The present paper outlines a rigorous model-based two-stage procedure to handle this practical problem in the spirit of a cooperative game. The minimum total annual cost (TAC) of each and every potential coalition was first determined with a conventional MINLP model, while the core and the risk-based Shapley values of all players were then computed with explicit formulas derived in this work to settle the benefit allocation issues. A simple example is presented at the end of this paper to demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed approach.

[1]  Jian-xing Ren,et al.  Profit allocation analysis among the distributed energy network participants based on Game-theory , 2017 .

[2]  Kazuo Matsuda,et al.  Applying heat integration total site based pinch technology to a large industrial area in Japan to further improve performance of highly efficient process plants , 2009 .

[3]  Justo Puerto,et al.  Core Solutions in Vector-Valued Games , 2002 .

[4]  M. Vangel System Reliability Theory: Models and Statistical Methods , 1996 .

[5]  Simon Harvey,et al.  From heat integration targets toward implementation – A TSA (total site analysis)-based design approach for heat recovery systems in industrial clusters , 2015 .

[6]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  A structural optimization approach in process synthesis. II: Heat recovery networks , 1983 .

[7]  B. Hobbs,et al.  A cooperative game theoretic analysis of incentives for microgrids in regulated electricity markets , 2016 .

[8]  Chenglin Chang,et al.  Simultaneous optimization of multi-plant heat integration using intermediate fluid circles , 2017 .

[9]  Markus Kraft,et al.  Quantitative tools for cultivating symbiosis in industrial parks; a literature review , 2015 .

[10]  Anita Kovač Kralj Heat Integration between Two Biodiesel Processes Using a Simple Method , 2008 .

[11]  David J. Sherwin,et al.  System Reliability Theory—Models and Statistical Methods , 1995 .

[12]  Chenglin Chang,et al.  A systematic framework for multi-plants Heat Integration combining Direct and Indirect Heat Integration methods , 2015 .

[13]  Jens Ludwig,et al.  Intercompany Energy Integration , 2012 .

[14]  Jie Li,et al.  Simultaneous design of heat exchanger network for heat integration using hot direct discharges/feeds between process plants , 2016 .

[15]  Jian-xing Ren,et al.  Benefit allocation for distributed energy network participants applying game theory based solutions , 2017 .

[16]  Qianli Deng,et al.  Strategic design of cost savings guarantee in energy performance contracting under uncertainty , 2015 .

[17]  Luonan Chen,et al.  Transmission expansion cost allocation based on cooperative game theory for congestion relief , 2005 .

[18]  Rex T.L. Ng,et al.  An Optimization-based Cooperative Game Approach for Allocation of Costs and Benefits in Interplant Process Integration , 2015 .

[19]  Miguel J. Bagajewicz,et al.  Multiple plant heat integration in a total site , 2002 .

[20]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Integrating district cooling systems in Locally Integrated Energy Sectors through Total Site Heat Integration , 2016 .

[21]  Y. Maali A multiobjective approach for solving cooperative n-person games , 2009 .

[22]  Chuei-Tin Chang,et al.  A game-theory based optimization strategy to configure inter-plant heat integration schemes , 2014 .

[23]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Algorithmic targeting for Total Site Heat Integration with variable energy supply/demand , 2014 .

[24]  Denny K. S. Ng,et al.  An optimization-based cooperative game approach for systematic allocation of costs and benefits in interplant process integration , 2016 .

[25]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  Total Site Heat Integration planning and design for industrial, urban and renewable systems , 2017 .

[26]  Chuei-Tin Chang,et al.  Game-theory based optimization strategies for stepwise development of indirect interplant heat integration plans , 2018 .

[27]  Christodoulos A. Floudas,et al.  Automatic synthesis of optimum heat exchanger network configurations , 1986 .

[28]  Stef Tijs,et al.  Models in Cooperative Game Theory , 2008 .

[29]  Mikael Rönnqvist,et al.  Cost Allocation in Collaborative Forest Transportation , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[30]  Michel Grabisch,et al.  A new approach to the core and Weber set of multichoice games , 2007, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[31]  John J.J. Chen Comments on improvements on a replacement for the logarithmic mean , 1987 .

[32]  Jiří Jaromír Klemeš,et al.  A retrofit framework for Total Site heat recovery systems , 2014 .

[33]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Simultaneous optimization models for heat integration—II. Heat exchanger network synthesis , 1990 .

[34]  Peng Yen Liew,et al.  A unified total site heat integration targeting method for isothermal and non-isothermal utilities , 2017 .