A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Tools for Suicide Prevention

Background Suicide is a leading cause of death globally, and there has been a rapid growth in the use of new technologies such as mobile health applications (apps) to help identify and support those at risk. However, it is not known whether these apps are evidence-based, or indeed contain potentially harmful content. This review examines the concordance of features in publicly available apps with current scientific evidence of effective suicide prevention strategies. Methods Apps referring to suicide or deliberate self-harm (DSH) were identified on the Android and iOS app stores. Systematic review methodology was employed to screen and review app content. App features were labelled using a coding scheme that reflected the broad range of evidence-based medical and population-based suicide prevention interventions. Best-practice for suicide prevention was based upon a World Health Organization report and supplemented by other reviews of the literature. Results One hundred and twenty-three apps referring to suicide were identified and downloaded for full review, 49 of which were found to contain at least one interactive suicide prevention feature. Most apps focused on obtaining support from friends and family (n = 27) and safety planning (n = 14). Of the different suicide prevention strategies contained within the apps, the strongest evidence in the literature was found for facilitating access to crisis support (n = 13). All reviewed apps contained at least one strategy that was broadly consistent with the evidence base or best-practice guidelines. Apps tended to focus on a single suicide prevention strategy (mean = 1.1), although safety plan apps provided the opportunity to provide a greater number of techniques (mean = 3.9). Potentially harmful content, such as listing lethal access to means or encouraging risky behaviour in a crisis, was also identified. Discussion Many suicide prevention apps are available, some of which provide elements of best practice, but none that provide comprehensive evidence-based support. Apps with potentially harmful content were also identified. Despite the number of apps available, and their varied purposes, there is a clear need to develop useful, pragmatic, and multifaceted mobile resources for this population. Clinicians should be wary in recommending apps, especially as potentially harmful content can be presented as helpful. Currently safety plan apps are the most comprehensive and evidence-informed, for example, “Safety Net” and “MoodTools—Depression Aid”.

[1]  Jette L Skovgaard Larsen,et al.  MYPLAN - A Mobile Phone Application for Supporting People at Risk of Suicide. , 2016, Crisis.

[2]  Mark Erik Larsen,et al.  Mobile Apps for Bipolar Disorder: A Systematic Review of Features and Content Quality , 2015, Journal of medical Internet research.

[3]  J. L. Bender,et al.  Finding a Depression App: A Review and Content Analysis of the Depression App Marketplace , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[4]  Julia E Hoffman,et al.  A Virtual Hope Box smartphone app as an accessory to therapy: proof-of-concept in a clinical sample of veterans. , 2015, Suicide & life-threatening behavior.

[5]  M. Keshavan,et al.  Smartphone Ownership and Interest in Mobile Applications to Monitor Symptoms of Mental Health Conditions , 2014, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[6]  Helen Christensen,et al.  The effectiveness of a suicide prevention app for indigenous Australian youths: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial , 2013, Trials.

[7]  H. Christensen,et al.  Smartphones for Smarter Delivery of Mental Health Programs: A Systematic Review , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[8]  Daniel Eisenberg,et al.  Self-reported Barriers to Professional Help Seeking Among College Students at Elevated Risk for Suicide , 2013, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[9]  Regina T. P. Aguirre,et al.  Development Guidelines from a Study of Suicide Prevention Mobile Applications (Apps) , 2013 .

[10]  Cecily Morrison,et al.  Apps for asthma self-management: a systematic assessment of content and tools , 2012, BMC Medicine.

[11]  Danuta Wasserman,et al.  The Representation of Suicide on the Internet: Implications for Clinicians , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[12]  Jennifer D. June,et al.  Technology-based suicide prevention: current applications and future directions. , 2011, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[13]  Amanda Aitken Ba Pgce DipCouns Suicide and the internet , 2009 .

[14]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Strategies for Suicide Prevention in Veterans , 2009 .

[15]  M. Leitner,et al.  Effectiveness of Interventions to Prevent Suicide and Suicidal Behaviour : A Systematic , 2007 .

[16]  D. Fernando,et al.  The internet and suicide: A double-edged tool. , 2007, European journal of internal medicine.

[17]  J. Lonnqvist,et al.  Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[18]  R. Spitzer,et al.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. , 2001, Journal of general internal medicine.

[19]  D. Novins,et al.  Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research , 1995 .

[20]  P. Mrazek,et al.  Reviews and Notes: Psychosocial Medicine: Reducing Risks for Mental Disorders: Frontiers for Preventive Intervention Research , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  M. Hamilton A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.