Incorporating reference products into modeling consumer choice decision: A mixtures-of-experts model

Abstract Understanding the process of consumer decision making is important for many decision support systems. Consumers evaluate different alternatives and then come to a decision. Prior research suggests that consumer evaluations leading to choice are comparative in nature and can be affected by other alternatives or reference products. This study proposes a mixtures-of-experts model framework to examine the role of different reference products in consumer choice of multi-attribute products. While multiple external and internal reference points have been proposed, previous studies have very rarely investigated more than one reference point in the same model. Using data from a choice-based conjoint experiment, our empirical model enables us to identify which product consumers tend to use as the reference product by incorporating four different reference products and includes consumer characteristics to examine how consumers differ in their utilization of different reference products. The results show that our model outperforms other reference-dependent models in prior literature. In our empirical context of smartphone choices, the most commonly used reference product is the most preferred product in the choice set, while the least preferred product and the average product are rarely used. We also examine the role of consumer characteristics such as gender, product familiarity, and product interest in utilizing reference products. This paper provides insights into the unobserved comparison process in consumer choice, which can be applied to decision support systems such as recommendation engines.

[1]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Exploring Differences in Males' and Females' Processing Strategies , 1991 .

[2]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  A reference price model of brand choice for frequently purchased products. , 1986 .

[3]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Random regret minimization for consumer choice modeling: Assessment of empirical evidence , 2013 .

[4]  D. Prelec,et al.  The Role of Inference in Context Effects: Inferring What You Want from What Is Available , 1997 .

[5]  G. Tellis,et al.  Contextual and Temporal Components of Reference Price , 1994 .

[6]  I. Simonson,et al.  Earning the Right to Indulge: Effort as a Determinant of Customer Preferences toward Frequency Program Rewards , 2002 .

[7]  Russell S. Winer,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Internal and External Reference Prices Using Scanner Data , 1992 .

[8]  Peter S. Fader,et al.  Multiattribute Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence: Evidence from the Performing Arts Industry , 2017, Manag. Sci..

[9]  R. Srivastava,et al.  Explaining Context Effects on Choice Using a Model of Comparative Judgment , 2000 .

[10]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  On linear mixture of expert approaches to information retrieval , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[11]  Douglas H. Wedell,et al.  Reference Price and Price Perceptions: A Comparison of Alternative Models , 2001 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[13]  R. Dhar,et al.  The Effect of the Focus of Comparison on Consumer Preferences , 1992 .

[14]  On Amir,et al.  Choice Construction versus Preference Construction: The Instability of Preferences Learned in Context , 2007 .

[15]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Comparison Effects on Preference Construction , 1999 .

[16]  Steven J. Sherman,et al.  The influence of unique features and direction of comparison of preferences , 1989 .

[17]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[18]  C. Chorus A New Model of Random Regret Minimization , 2010, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[19]  Chuan-Hoo Tan,et al.  Consumer-based decision aid that explains which to buy: Decision confirmation or overconfidence bias? , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[20]  M. Wedel,et al.  The No—Choice Alternative in Conjoint Choice Experiments , 2001 .

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An empirical examination of the influence of biased personalized product recommendations on consumers' decision making outcomes , 2018, Decis. Support Syst..

[22]  H. Helson Adaptation-level theory : an experimental and systematic approach to behavior , 1964 .

[23]  T. Mussweiler Comparison processes in social judgment: mechanisms and consequences. , 2003, Psychological review.

[24]  Donald R. Jones,et al.  The effects of incorporating compensatory choice strategies in Web-based consumer decision support systems , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[25]  Daniel Klapper,et al.  Another look at loss aversion in brand choice data: Can we characterize the loss averse consumer? , 2005 .

[26]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[27]  Tammo H. A. Bijmolt,et al.  Incorporating Context Effects into a Choice Model , 2010 .

[28]  Michael Scholz,et al.  Measuring consumers' willingness to pay with utility-based recommendation systems , 2015, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  Wagner A. Kamakura,et al.  Predicting Choice Shares under Conditions of Brand Interdependence , 1984 .

[30]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Contrast Effects in Consumer Judgments: Changes in Mental Representations or in the Anchoring of Rating Scales? , 1991 .

[31]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Alternative Models for Capturing the Compromise Effect , 2004 .

[32]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice , 1993 .

[33]  Mark J. Garratt,et al.  Efficient Experimental Design with Marketing Research Applications , 1994 .

[34]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[35]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Hierarchical Mixtures of Experts and the EM Algorithm , 1994, Neural Computation.

[36]  A. Parducci Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[37]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[38]  Caspar G. Chorus,et al.  Random Regret-based Discrete Choice Modeling: A Tutorial , 2012 .

[39]  Purushottam Papatla,et al.  Loyalty differences in the use of internal and external reference prices , 1995 .

[40]  A. Yesim Orhun,et al.  Optimal Product Line Design When Consumers Exhibit Choice Set-Dependent Preferences , 2009, Mark. Sci..

[41]  Jiafu Tang,et al.  Optimal product positioning with consideration of negative utility effect on consumer choice rule , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[42]  Moshe Ben-Akiva,et al.  Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand , 1985 .

[43]  Allen Parducci,et al.  Happiness, Pleasure, and Judgment: The Contextual Theory and Its Applications , 1995 .

[44]  Friedrich Leisch,et al.  Identifiability of Finite Mixtures of Multinomial Logit Models with Varying and Fixed Effects , 2008, J. Classif..

[45]  Ming Zhou,et al.  Reference price effect and its implications for decision making in online auctions: An empirical study , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..