Evaluation of COSHH essentials: methylene chloride, isopropanol, and acetone exposures in a small printing plant.

The current study evaluated the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Essentials model for short-term task-based exposures and full-shift exposures using measured concentrations of three volatile organic chemicals at a small printing plant. A total of 188 exposure measurements of isopropanol and 187 measurements of acetone were collected and each measurement took approximately 60 min. Historically, collected time-weighted average concentrations (seven results) were evaluated for methylene chloride. The COSHH Essentials model recommended general ventilation control for both isopropanol and acetone. There was good agreement between the task-based exposure measurements and the COSHH Essentials predicted exposure range (PER) for cleaning and print preparation with isopropanol and for cleaning with acetone. For the other tasks and for full-shift exposures, agreement between the exposure measurements and the PER was either moderate or poor. However, for both isopropanol and acetone, our findings suggested that the COSHH Essentials model worked reasonably well because the probabilities of short-term exposure measurements exceeding short-term occupational exposure limits (OELs) or full-shift exposures exceeding the corresponding full-shift OELs were <0.05 under the recommended control strategy. For methylene chloride, the COSHH Essentials recommended containment control but a follow-up study was not able to be performed because it had already been replaced with a less hazardous substance (acetone). This was considered a more acceptable alternative to increasing the level of control.

[1]  M Tischer,et al.  Evaluation of the HSE COSHH Essentials exposure predictive model on the basis of BAuA field studies and existing substances exposure data. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[2]  John S. Evans,et al.  Subjective Estimation of Toluene Exposures: A Calibration Study of Industrial Hygienists , 1989 .

[3]  I M Brooke A UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals: toxicological considerations. , 1998, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[4]  Haruo Hashimoto,et al.  Evaluation of the Control Banding Method—Comparison with Measurement‐based Comprehensive Risk Assessment , 2007, Journal of occupational health.

[5]  Steve Bailey,et al.  Evaluation of the utility and reliability of COSHH Essentials. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  Flammables,et al.  COSHH Essentials, Easy Steps To Control Health Risks From Chemicals , 2003 .

[7]  Paul Evans,et al.  Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapour degreasing and bag-filling operations. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  S. Maidment,et al.  An introduction to a UK scheme to help small firms control health risks from chemicals. , 1998, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  J de Graeve,et al.  A structured strategy for assessing chemical risks, suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises. , 2003, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[10]  S. Maidment Occupational hygiene considerations in the development of a structured approach to select chemical control strategies. , 1998, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  Rachael M. Jones,et al.  Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for vapor degreasing and bag filling operations. , 2006, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  David M Zalk,et al.  History and Evolution of Control Banding: A Review , 2006, Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene.

[13]  John Kingston,et al.  The development of the EASE model. , 2005, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[14]  P G Evans,et al.  Risk management measures for chemicals: the “COSHH essentials” approach , 2007, Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental Epidemiology.

[15]  Sven Ove Hansson,et al.  How accurate are the European Union's classifications of chemical substances. , 2003, Toxicology letters.

[16]  K. A. Busch,et al.  Occupational exposure sampling strategy manual , 1977 .

[17]  C Brownie,et al.  The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.