Safety and efficacy of INCB018424, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, in myelofibrosis.

BACKGROUND Myelofibrosis is a Philadelphia chromosome–negative myeloproliferative neoplasm associated with cytopenias, splenomegaly, poor quality of life, and shortened survival. About half of patients with myelofibrosis carry a gain-of-function mutation in the Janus kinase 2 gene (JAK2 V617F) that contributes to the pathophysiology of the disease. INCB018424 is a potent and selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) and JAK2 inhibitor. METHODS We conducted a phase 1−2 trial of INCB018424 in patients with JAK2 V617F−positive or JAK2 V617F−negative primary myelofibrosis, post–essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis, or post–polycythemia vera myelofibrosis. RESULTS A total of 153 patients received INCB018424 for a median duration of more than 14.7 months. The initial dose-escalation phase established 25 mg twice daily or 100 mg once daily as maximum tolerated doses, on the basis of reversible thrombocytopenia. A dose-dependent suppression of phosphorylated signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), a marker of JAK signaling, was demonstrated in patients with wild-type JAK2 and in patients with the JAK2 V617F mutation. We studied additional doses and established that a 15-mg twice-daily starting dose, followed by individualized dose titration, was the most effective and safest dosing regimen. At this dose, 17 of 33 patients (52%) had a rapid objective response (≥50% reduction of splenomegaly) lasting for 12 months or more, and this therapy was associated with grade 3 or grade 4 adverse events (mainly myelosuppression) in less than 10% of patients. Patients with debilitating symptoms, including weight loss, fatigue, night sweats, and pruritus, had rapid improvement. Clinical benefits were associated with a marked diminution of levels of circulating inflammatory cytokines that are commonly elevated in myelofibrosis. CONCLUSIONS INCB018424 was associated with marked and durable clinical benefits in patients with myelofibrosis for whom no approved therapies existed. (Funded by Incyte; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00509899.)

[1]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Preclinical characterization of the selective JAK1/2 inhibitor INCB018424: therapeutic implications for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. , 2010, Blood.

[2]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Functional assessment of performance status in patients with myelofibrosis (MF): Utility and feasibility of the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Sloan,et al.  The Myelofibrosis Symptom Assessment Form (MFSAF): an evidence-based brief inventory to measure quality of life and symptomatic response to treatment in myelofibrosis. , 2009, Leukemia research.

[4]  T. Barbui,et al.  Identification of patients with poorer survival in primary myelofibrosis based on the burden of JAK2V617F mutated allele. , 2009, Blood.

[5]  D. Hwang,et al.  Gastrosplenic fistula from Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Mesa,et al.  New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. , 2008, Blood.

[7]  S. Verstovsek Therapeutic potential of JAK2 inhibitors. , 2009, Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program.

[8]  B. Gajkowska,et al.  Crossroads of cytokine signaling--the chase to stop muscle cachexia. , 2008, Journal of physiology and pharmacology : an official journal of the Polish Physiological Society.

[9]  G. Barosi,et al.  Life expectancy and prognostic factors in the classic BCR/ABL-negative myeloproliferative disorders , 2008, Leukemia.

[10]  R. Mesa,et al.  Low JAK2V617F allele burden in primary myelofibrosis, compared to either a higher allele burden or unmutated status, is associated with inferior overall and leukemia-free survival , 2008, Leukemia.

[11]  Paola Guglielmelli,et al.  JAK2 V617F mutational status predicts progression to large splenomegaly and leukemic transformation in primary myelofibrosis. , 2007, Blood.

[12]  J. Spivak,et al.  Phenotypic variations and new mutations in JAK2 V617F-negative polycythemia vera, erythrocytosis, and idiopathic myelofibrosis. , 2007, Experimental hematology.

[13]  J. Sloan,et al.  The burden of fatigue and quality of life in myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) , 2007, Cancer.

[14]  H. Deeg,et al.  International Working Group (IWG) consensus criteria for treatment response in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia, for the IWG for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT). , 2006, Blood.

[15]  A. Tefferi New insights into the pathogenesis and drug treatment of myelofibrosis , 2006, Current opinion in hematology.

[16]  D. Steensma,et al.  The JAK2V617F tyrosine kinase mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: lineage specificity and clinical correlates , 2005 .

[17]  E. Hatzimichael,et al.  Serum interleukin (IL)‐1, IL‐2, sIL‐2Ra, IL‐6 and thrombopoietin levels in patients with chronic myeloproliferative diseases , 2005, British Journal of Haematology.

[18]  Mario Cazzola,et al.  A gain-of-function mutation of JAK2 in myeloproliferative disorders. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  D. Steensma,et al.  The JAK2(V617F) tyrosine kinase mutation in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: lineage specificity and clinical correlates. , 2005, British journal of haematology.

[20]  M. Cazzola,et al.  Life expectancy and prognostic factors for survival in patients with polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[21]  D. Hossfeld E.S. Jaffe, N.L. Harris, H. Stein, J.W. Vardiman (eds). World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues , 2002 .

[22]  R. Kurzrock The role of cytokines in cancer‐related fatigue , 2001, Cancer.

[23]  A. Tefferi Myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  P. Morel,et al.  Prognostic factors in agnogenic myeloid metaplasia: a report on 195 cases with a new scoring system. , 1996, Blood.

[25]  E. McFadden,et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group , 1982, American journal of clinical oncology.