Rapid prediction of solvation free energy. 3. Application to the SAMPL2 challenge

The SAMPL2 hydration free energy blind prediction challenge consisted of a data set of 41 molecules divided into three subsets: explanatory, obscure and investigatory, where experimental hydration free energies were given for the explanatory, withheld for the obscure, and not known for the investigatory molecules. We employed two solvation models for this challenge, a linear interaction energy (LIE) model based on explicit-water molecular dynamics simulations, and the first-shell hydration (FiSH) continuum model previously calibrated to mimic LIE data. On the 23 compounds from the obscure (blind) dataset, the prospectively submitted LIE and FiSH models provided predictions highly correlated with experimental hydration free energy data, with mean-unsigned-errors of 1.69 and 1.71 kcal/mol, respectively. We investigated several parameters that may affect the performance of these models, namely, the solute flexibility for the LIE explicit-solvent model, the solute partial charging method, and the incorporation of the difference in intramolecular energy between gas and solution phases for both models. We extended this analysis to the various chemical classes that can be formed within the SAMPL2 dataset. Our results strengthen previous findings on the excellent accuracy and transferability of the LIE explicit-solvent approach to predict transfer free energies across a wide spectrum of functional classes. Further, the current results on the SAMPL2 test dataset provide additional support for the FiSH continuum model as a fast yet accurate alternative to the LIE explicit-solvent model. Overall, both the LIE explicit-solvent model and the FiSH continuum solvation model show considerable improvement on the SAMPL2 data set over our previous continuum electrostatics-dispersion solvation model used in the SAMPL1 blind challenge.

[1]  J. Aqvist,et al.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design. , 1994, Protein engineering.

[2]  Ronald M. Levy,et al.  The SGB/NP hydration free energy model based on the surface generalized born solvent reaction field and novel nonpolar hydration free energy estimators , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[3]  T. Halgren MMFF VII. Characterization of MMFF94, MMFF94s, and other widely available force fields for conformational energies and for intermolecular‐interaction energies and geometries , 1999, Journal of computational chemistry.

[4]  K. Sharp,et al.  Macroscopic models of aqueous solutions : biological and chemical applications , 1993 .

[5]  J. Tomasi,et al.  Dispersion and repulsion contributions to the solvation energy: Refinements to a simple computational model in the continuum approximation , 1991 .

[6]  Araz Jakalian,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: I. Method , 2000 .

[7]  B. Roux,et al.  Implicit solvent models. , 1999, Biophysical chemistry.

[8]  Sheldon Dennis,et al.  Prediction of SAMPL-1 hydration free energies using a continuum electrostatics-dispersion model. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[9]  Ricardo L Mancera Molecular modeling of hydration in drug design. , 2007, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[10]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Rapid Prediction of Solvation Free Energy. 2. The First-Shell Hydration (FiSH) Continuum Model. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[11]  J. Bajorath,et al.  Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  David L Mobley,et al.  Predicting small-molecule solvation free energies: an informal blind test for computational chemistry. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[13]  K. Sharp,et al.  Accurate Calculation of Hydration Free Energies Using Macroscopic Solvent Models , 1994 .

[14]  Christopher I. Bayly,et al.  Fast, efficient generation of high‐quality atomic charges. AM1‐BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation , 2002, J. Comput. Chem..

[15]  B. Honig,et al.  New Model for Calculation of Solvation Free Energies: Correction of Self-Consistent Reaction Field Continuum Dielectric Theory for Short-Range Hydrogen-Bonding Effects , 1996 .

[16]  David L Mobley,et al.  Charge asymmetries in hydration of polar solutes. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[17]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  A simple yet accurate boundary element method for continuum dielectric calculations , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[18]  Martin Zacharias,et al.  Continuum Solvent Modeling of Nonpolar Solvation: Improvement by Separating Surface Area Dependent Cavity and Dispersion Contributions , 2003 .

[19]  David L Mobley,et al.  Small molecule hydration free energies in explicit solvent: An extensive test of fixed-charge atomistic simulations. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[20]  Ray Luo,et al.  Implicit nonpolar solvent models. , 2007, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[21]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  The PDBbind database: collection of binding affinities for protein-ligand complexes with known three-dimensional structures. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[22]  T. Simonson,et al.  Macromolecular electrostatics: continuum models and their growing pains. , 2001, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  M. Gilson,et al.  Calculation of protein-ligand binding affinities. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[24]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Molecular basis for the Born model of ion solvation , 1990 .

[25]  Irwin D Kuntz,et al.  Estimation of Absolute Free Energies of Hydration Using Continuum Methods: Accuracy of Partial Charge Models and Optimization of Nonpolar Contributions , 2022 .

[26]  Benoît Roux,et al.  Computations of Absolute Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules Using Explicit and Implicit Solvent Model. , 2009, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[27]  Junmei Wang,et al.  Development and testing of a general amber force field , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[28]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[29]  Harold A. Scheraga,et al.  Free energies of hydration of solute molecules. 3. Application of the hydration shell model to charged organic molecules , 1987 .

[30]  Enrico O. Purisima,et al.  Fast summation boundary element method for calculating solvation free energies of macromolecules , 1998 .

[31]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[32]  Robert J. Woods,et al.  Molecular Mechanical and Molecular Dynamic Simulations of Glycoproteins and Oligosaccharides. 1. GLYCAM_93 Parameter Development , 1995 .

[33]  Themis Lazaridis,et al.  Water at biomolecular binding interfaces. , 2007, Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP.

[34]  Donald G. Truhlar,et al.  MODEL FOR AQUEOUS SOLVATION BASED ON CLASS IV ATOMIC CHARGES AND FIRST SOLVATION SHELL EFFECTS , 1996 .

[35]  Thomas Scior,et al.  Large compound databases for structure-activity relationships studies in drug discovery. , 2007, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[36]  Charles L Brooks,et al.  Recent advances in implicit solvent-based methods for biomolecular simulations. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[37]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Improving implicit solvent simulations: a Poisson-centric view. , 2005, Current opinion in structural biology.

[38]  Carmay Lim,et al.  Theory of Ionic Hydration: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Experiment , 1999 .

[39]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  AN EXTENDED LINEAR RESPONSE METHOD FOR DETERMINING FREE ENERGIES OF HYDRATION , 1995 .

[40]  Ray Luo,et al.  How well does Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent agree with explicit solvent? A quantitative analysis. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[41]  U. Singh,et al.  A NEW FORCE FIELD FOR MOLECULAR MECHANICAL SIMULATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINS , 1984 .

[42]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Restoring charge asymmetry in continuum electrostatics calculations of hydration free energies. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[43]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  The SAMP1 solvation challenge: further lessons regarding the pitfalls of parametrization. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[44]  Barry Honig,et al.  Reevaluation of the Born model of ion hydration , 1985 .

[45]  P. Claverie,et al.  Calculation of the interaction energy of one molecule with its whole surrounding. I. Method and application to pure nonpolar compounds , 1972 .

[46]  Anthony K. Felts,et al.  On the nonpolar hydration free energy of proteins: surface area and continuum solvent models for the solute-solvent interaction energy. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[47]  A. Rashin,et al.  Aspects of protein energetics and dynamics. , 1993, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[48]  Traian Sulea,et al.  Rapid Prediction of Solvation Free Energy. 1. An Extensive Test of Linear Interaction Energy (LIE). , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[49]  David L Mobley,et al.  Treating entropy and conformational changes in implicit solvent simulations of small molecules. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[50]  M. Rami Reddy,et al.  Free energy calculations in rational drug design , 2001 .

[51]  Kenneth S. Pitzer,et al.  The Free Energy of Hydration of Gaseous Ions, and the Absolute Potential of the Normal Calomel Electrode , 1939 .

[52]  Jacopo Tomasi,et al.  Evaluation of the dispersion contribution to the solvation energy. A simple computational model in the continuum approximation , 1989 .

[53]  J. Guthrie,et al.  A blind challenge for computational solvation free energies: introduction and overview. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[54]  David L Mobley,et al.  Predictions of hydration free energies from all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[55]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[56]  Anthony Nicholls,et al.  The SAMPL2 blind prediction challenge: introduction and overview , 2010, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[57]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.