Deep Granular Feature-Label Distribution Learning for Neuroimaging-Based Infant Age Prediction

Neuroimaging-based infant age prediction is important for brain development analysis but often suffers insufficient data. To address this challenge, we introduce label distribution learning (LDL), a popular machine learning paradigm focusing on the small sample problem, for infant age prediction. As directly applying LDL yields dramatically increased number of day-to-day age labels and also extremely scarce data describing each label, we propose a new strategy, called granular label distribution (GLD). Particularly, by assembling the adjacent labels to granules and designing granular distributions, GLD makes each brain MRI contribute to not only its own age but also its neighboring ages at a granule scale, which effectively keeps the information augmentation superiority of LDL and reduces the number of labels. Furthermore, to extremely augment the information supplied by the small data, we propose a novel method named granular feature distribution (GFD). GFD leverages the variability of the brain images at the same age, thus significantly increasing the learning effectiveness. Moreover, deep neural network is exploited to approximate the GLD. These strategies constitute a new model: deep granular feature-label distribution learning (DGFLDL). By taking 8 types of cortical morphometric features from structural MRI as predictors, the proposed DGFLDL is validated on infant age prediction using 384 brain MRI scans from 35 to 848 days after birth. Our proposed method, approaching the mean absolute error as 36.1 days, significantly outperforms the baseline methods. Besides, the permutation importance analysis of features based on our method reveals important biomarkers of infant brain development.

[1]  William M. Wells,et al.  A Feature-Based Developmental Model of the Infant Brain in Structural MRI , 2012, MICCAI.

[2]  Daniel S. Margulies,et al.  Predicting brain-age from multimodal imaging data captures cognitive impairment , 2016, NeuroImage.

[3]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  T1 white/gray contrast as a predictor of chronological age, and an index of cognitive performance , 2017, NeuroImage.

[4]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  The UNC/UMN Baby Connectome Project (BCP): An overview of the study design and protocol development , 2019, NeuroImage.

[5]  Christian Gaser,et al.  BrainAGE score indicates accelerated brain aging in schizophrenia, but not bipolar disorder , 2017, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[6]  Jianxin Wu,et al.  Deep Label Distribution Learning With Label Ambiguity , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  Xin Geng,et al.  Label Distribution Learning , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops.

[8]  Y. Stern,et al.  Differences between chronological and brain age are related to education and self-reported physical activity , 2016, Neurobiology of Aging.

[9]  Jesper Andersson,et al.  A multi-modal parcellation of human cerebral cortex , 2016, Nature.

[10]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Computational neuroanatomy of baby brains: A review , 2019, NeuroImage.

[11]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Construction of 4D high-definition cortical surface atlases of infants: Methods and applications , 2015, Medical Image Anal..

[12]  J. Cole,et al.  Predicting Age Using Neuroimaging: Innovative Brain Ageing Biomarkers , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  Martin Styner,et al.  Prenatal and Neonatal Brain Structure and White Matter Maturation in Children at High Risk for Schizophrenia AJP in Advance , 2010 .

[14]  Jean-Luc Dugelay,et al.  Effective training of convolutional neural networks for face-based gender and age prediction , 2017, Pattern Recognit..