Estimating The Appropriate Size Of Global Pull Incentives For Antibacterial Medicines.

Antibacterial medicines should be foundational for modern medicine-a key part of the infrastructure of contemporary practice. Recently, however, antibacterials have struggled commercially. Even with "push" incentives (grants paid before regulatory approval), antibacterials have failed on the market because revenues are tied to volume sold. There are policy initiatives under way in the United States and United Kingdom that explore paying for exceptional antibacterials with "pull" incentives (paid after regulatory approval) by delinking the payments from volume via other payment formats such as market entry rewards and subscriptions. This article discusses these initiatives but also proposes an expected net present value model for calculating the global incentives required to create a functional antibacterial market, exploring options such as antibacterial subscriptions, market entry rewards, push incentives, higher prices, and drug development through charitable efforts. The model estimates that current push incentives should be continued, but governments must also enact pull incentives that will add several billion dollars to the global revenue stream of a highly innovative antibacterial, reduced by any grants received supporting clinical development of that product. The amounts in the proposed Pioneering Antibiotic Subscriptions to End Upsurging Resistance (PASTEUR) Act of 2021 and a UK pilot program are well within the bounds of an effective antibacterial pull incentive.

[1]  J. Rex,et al.  Patient access in fourteen high-income countries to new antibacterials approved by the FDA, EMA, PMDA, or Health Canada, 2010-2020. , 2021, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  A. Kesselheim,et al.  INTRODUCTION: Public Sector and Non-Profit Contributions to Drug Development — Historical Scope, Opportunities, and Challenges , 2021, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[3]  L. Moja,et al.  Reimbursement models to tackle market failures for antimicrobials: Approaches taken in France, Germany, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. , 2020, Health policy.

[4]  J. Rex,et al.  Antibacterial R&D at a crossroads: We've pushed as hard as we can … now we need to start pulling! , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[5]  J. Rex,et al.  Evaluating for-profit public benefit corporations as an additional structure for antibiotic development and commercialization. , 2020, Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[6]  M. Ploy,et al.  Financing Pull Mechanisms for Antibiotic-Related Innovation: Opportunities for Europe , 2020, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[7]  K. Outterson,et al.  A shot in the arm for new antibiotics , 2019, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  Francesco Ciabuschi,et al.  Simulating Market Entry Rewards for Antibiotics Development , 2018, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[9]  D. Cutler,et al.  Factors of U.S. Hospitals Associated with Improved Profit Margins: An Observational Study , 2018, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[10]  J. Rex,et al.  Time for a change in how new antibiotics are reimbursed: Development of an insurance framework for funding new antibiotics based on a policy of risk mitigation. , 2017, Health policy.

[11]  J. Powers,et al.  Repairing the Broken Market for Antibiotic Innovation , 2015, Health affairs.

[12]  Michael Hay,et al.  Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  A. Hollis,et al.  Combating Antibiotic Resistance Through the Health Impact Fund , 2011 .

[14]  S. Projan,et al.  Why is big Pharma getting out of antibacterial drug discovery? , 2003, Current opinion in microbiology.