Locations of radiation-produced DNA double strand breaks along chromosomes: a stochastic cluster process formalism.

Ionizing radiation produces DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) in chromosomes. For densely ionizing radiation, the DSBs are not spaced randomly along a chromosome: recent data for size distributions of DNA fragments indicate break clustering on kbp-Mbp scales. Different DSB clusters on a chromosome are typically made by different, statistically independent, stochastically structured radiation tracks, and the average number of tracks involved can be small. We therefore model DSB positions along a chromosome as a stationary Poisson cluster process, i.e. a stochastic process consisting of secondary point processes whose locations are determined by a primary point process that is Poisson. Each secondary process represents a break cluster, typically consisting of 1-10 DSBs in a comparatively localized stochastic pattern determined by chromatin geometry and radiation track structure. Using this Poisson cluster process model, which we call the randomly located clusters (RLC) formalism, theorems are derived for how the DNA fragment-size distribution depends on radiation dose. The RLC dose-response relations become non-linear when the dose becomes so high that DSB clusters from different tracks overlap or adjoin closely. The RLC formalism generalizes previous models, fits current data adequately and facilitates mechanistically based extrapolations from high-dose experiments to the much lower doses of interest for most applications.

[1]  J. Ward,et al.  The complexity of DNA damage: relevance to biological consequences. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[2]  Aloke Chatterjee,et al.  Clusters of DNA Damage Induced by Ionizing Radiation: Formation of Short DNA Fragments. I. Theoretical Modeling , 1996 .

[3]  Daryl J. Daley,et al.  An Introduction to the Theory of Point Processes , 2013 .

[4]  D J Brenner,et al.  Constraints on energy deposition and target size of multiply damaged sites associated with DNA double-strand breaks. , 1992, International journal of radiation biology.

[5]  K. Prise,et al.  DNA double-strand break distributions in X-ray and alpha-particle irradiated V79 cells: evidence for non-random breakage. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[6]  R K Sachs,et al.  The link between low-LET dose-response relations and the underlying kinetics of damage production/repair/misrepair. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[7]  V. Moiseenko,et al.  Modelling the kinetics of chromosome exchange formation in human cells exposed to ionising radiation , 1996, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[8]  A. Friedl,et al.  Computer simulation of pulsed field gel runs allows the quantitation of radiation‐induced double‐strand breaks in yeast , 1994, Electrophoresis.

[9]  V. Michalik Energy deposition clusters in nanometer regions of charged-particle tracks. , 1993, Radiation research.

[10]  M. Löbrich,et al.  DNA double-strand breaks induced by high-energy neon and iron ions in human fibroblasts. I. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis method. , 1994, Radiation research.

[11]  A. Friedl,et al.  An electrophoretic approach to the assessment of the spatial distribution of DNA double‐strand breaks in mammalian cells , 1995, Electrophoresis.

[12]  A. Kellerer Fundamentals of microdosimetry , 1985 .

[13]  J. Strouboulis,et al.  Functional compartmentalization of the nucleus. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[14]  D J Brenner,et al.  Track structure, lesion development, and cell survival. , 1990, Radiation research.

[15]  D. Brenner,et al.  A formalism for analysing large-scale clustering of radiation-induced breaks along chromosomes. , 1998, International journal of radiation biology.

[16]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Non-random distribution of DNA double-strand breaks induced by particle irradiation. , 1996, International journal of radiation biology.

[17]  Dudley T. Goodhead,et al.  1 – Relationship of Microdosimetric Techniques to Applications in Biological Systems , 1987 .

[18]  G van den Engh,et al.  A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R K Sachs,et al.  Polymer models for interphase chromosomes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  C Cremer,et al.  Role of chromosome territories in the functional compartmentalization of the cell nucleus. , 1993, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[21]  J. Sedat,et al.  Deconstructing the nucleus: global architecture from local interactions. , 1997, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[22]  A Ottolenghi,et al.  DNA complex lesions induced by protons and ⋅-particles: track structure characteristics determining linear energy transfer and particle type dependence , 1997, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[23]  W. Dewey,et al.  Methods for the quantification of DNA double-strand breaks determined from the distribution of DNA fragment sizes measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. , 1995, Radiation research.

[24]  D. Agard,et al.  Perturbation of Nuclear Architecture by Long-Distance Chromosome Interactions , 1996, Cell.

[25]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Energy deposition mechanisms and biochemical aspects of DNA strand breaks by ionizing radiation , 1991 .

[26]  C S Lange,et al.  The 30 nm chromatin fiber as a flexible polymer. , 1994, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[27]  F. H. Attix,et al.  The Dosimetry of Ionizing Radiation, Vol. 2 , 1987 .

[28]  R K Sachs,et al.  Review: proximity effects in the production of chromosome aberrations by ionizing radiation. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[29]  B. Rydberg,et al.  Clusters of DNA damage induced by ionizing radiation: formation of short DNA fragments. II. Experimental detection. , 1996, Radiation research.

[30]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An introduction to the bootstrap , 1993 .

[31]  D. Lea Actions of radiations on living cells. , 1955 .