Endogenous imitation and endogenous growth in a North-South model: A theoretical analysis

This paper presents a modified version of the North-South endogenous imitation model of Grossman and Helpman [Grossman, G., Helpman, E., 1991b. Endogenous product cycles. The Economic Journal 101, 1241-1229] based on the product variety framework. We show that a tighter Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) protection in the South leads to an increase in the rate of innovation in the North in the steady state equilibrium. We also analyse some transitional dynamic properties of this modified model and derive comparative dynamic effects on the North-South relative wage with respect to changes in the IPR protection parameter. We also focus on the welfare effects of the policy of IPR strengthening. The South may have a welfare gain in this model when the IPR protection policy is strengthened. This result is different from that obtained in Helpman [Helpman, E., 1993. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights. Econometrica 61(6), 1247-1280] model where IPR strengthening causes welfare loss of the South.

[1]  Charles I. Jones,et al.  Time Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models , 1995 .

[2]  Debasis Mondal,et al.  Stability analysis of the Grossman-Helpman model of endogenous product cycles , 2008 .

[3]  Joseph Pearlman,et al.  Winners and losers in a North–South model of growth, innovation and product cycles , 2001 .

[4]  Innovation, imitation and intellectual property rights: Introducing migration in Helpman's model , 2008 .

[5]  D. Dollar.  Technological Innovation, Capital Mobility, and the Product Cycle in North-South Trade , 1983 .

[6]  D. Mondal,et al.  Innovation, imitation and multinationalisation in a North–South model: a theoretical note , 2008 .

[7]  Philippe Martin,et al.  Growing locations: Industry location in a model of endogenous growth , 1999, World Scientific Studies in International Economics.

[8]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  L. Arnold.  On the growth effects of North–South trade: the role of labor market flexibility , 2002 .

[10]  R. Forslid,et al.  Agglomeration and growth with and without capital mobility , 2001 .

[11]  The product cycle and the world distribution of income A reformulation , 1995 .

[12]  D. Valderrama,et al.  Implications of Intellectual Property Rights for Dynamic Gains from Trade , 2004 .

[13]  P. Levine,et al.  Phases of Imitation and Innovation in a North-South Endogenous Growth Model , 1999 .

[14]  G. Grossman,et al.  ENDOGENOUS PRDUCT CYCLES , 1989 .

[15]  Charles I. Jones,et al.  R & D-Based Models of Economic Growth , 1995, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  E. Helpman.  Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights , 1992 .

[17]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[18]  G. Grossman,et al.  Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth , 1989 .

[19]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Growth in Cities , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Paul Krugman,et al.  A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  G. Grossman,et al.  Endogenous Product Cycles , 1989 .

[22]  Ari Kuncoro,et al.  Industrial Development in Cities , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  J. Jacobs,et al.  The Economy of Cities , 1969 .

[24]  L. Arnold.  Growth, Welfare, and Trade in an Integrated Model of Human-Capital Accumulation and Research , 1998 .

[25]  Philippe Martin,et al.  Industrial location and public infrastructure , 1994 .

[26]  R. Feenstra,et al.  Trade and Uneven Growth , 1990 .

[27]  Amy Jocelyn Glass,et al.  Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment , 2002 .

[28]  D. Mondal,et al.  Innovation, Imitation and Intellectual Property Rights: A Note on Helpman's Model , 2006 .

[29]  L. Arnold.  Growth in stages , 2003 .

[30]  E. Lai,et al.  International intellectual property rights protection and the rate of product innovation , 1998 .