The New Environmental Paradigm and Personal Norms

Using data from nationwide representative samples from Sweden and from Sweden's largest environmental organization, proenvironmental behavior is interpreted in the light of Schwartz's norm activation theory. The New Environmental Paradigm (NEP) scale is used as an indicator of awareness of consequences, while inclination to guilt feelings, if harming the environment, is used as an indicator of a personal norm. Regression analysis of proenvironmental behavior and willingness to pay higher prices for environmentally friendly food showed that the indicator of a personal norm was far more strongly correlated to proenvironmental behavior and willingness to pay, respectively, than the NEP scale. Education and income showed hardly any influence on proenvironmental behavior and willingness to pay, whereas gender and age fell somewhere in between. An attempt is made to explain the generally weak correlations between NEP and environmentally relevant variables by pointing out the generally high level of agreement with the NEP items among Swedes.

[1]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action , 1965 .

[2]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Awareness of Consequences and the Influence of Moral Norms on Interpersonal Behavior , 1968 .

[3]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  WORDS, DEEDS, AND THE PERCEPTION OF CONSEQUENCES AND RESPONSIBILITY IN ACTION SITUATIONS ' , 1968 .

[4]  S H Schwartz,et al.  Elicitation of moral obligation and self-sacrificing behavior: an experimental study of volunteering to be a bone marrow donor. , 1970, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Shalom H. Schwartz,et al.  Normative explanations of helping behavior: A critique, proposal, and empirical test , 1973 .

[6]  Thomas A. Heberlein,et al.  Attitudinal specificity and the prediction of behavior in a field setting. , 1976 .

[7]  S. Schwartz.  Normative Influences on Altruism , 1977 .

[8]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Moral Norms and Environmental Behavior: An Application of Schwartz's Norm-Activation Model to Yard Burning1 , 1978 .

[9]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[10]  R. Dunlap,et al.  A New Ecological Paradigm for Post-Exuberant Sociology , 1980 .

[11]  T. Heberlein,et al.  Cognitive Consistency and Environmental Action , 1981 .

[12]  Richard D. Katzev,et al.  The Effect of Strength of Commitment on Newspaper Recycling , 1983 .

[13]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms , 1985 .

[14]  P. Stern,et al.  Personal and contextual influences on househould energy adaptations. , 1985 .

[15]  Raymond De Young,et al.  Encouraging Environmentally Appropriate Behavior: The Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1985 .

[16]  I. Altman,et al.  Handbook of environmental psychology , 1987 .

[17]  M. Abrahamson,et al.  Principles of Group Solidarity. , 1988 .

[18]  Stephanie L. Witt,et al.  Gender Differences in Environmental Orientations: a Comparison of Publics and Activists in Canada and the U.S , 1989 .

[19]  J. Elster,et al.  The Cement Of Society , 1989 .

[20]  Jon Elster,et al.  The Cement Of Society , 1991 .

[21]  J. Piliavin,et al.  Altruism: A Review of Recent Theory and Research , 1990 .

[22]  Joseph R. Hopper,et al.  Recycling as Altruistic Behavior , 1991 .

[23]  S. Schwartz.  Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries , 1992 .

[24]  P. Stern,et al.  Value Orientations, Gender, and Environmental Concern , 1993 .

[25]  G. Marwell,et al.  The critical mass in collective action , 1993 .

[26]  P. Stern,et al.  The Value Basis of Environmental Concern , 1994 .

[27]  G. Gooch.  Territories of Environmental Concern. , 1995 .

[28]  Geoffrey Gooch,et al.  Environmental Beliefs and Attitudes in Sweden and the Baltic States , 1995 .

[29]  P. Stern,et al.  Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships , 1995 .

[30]  P. Stern,et al.  The New Ecological Paradigm in Social-Psychological Context , 1995 .

[31]  John Thøgersen,et al.  Recycling and Morality , 1996 .