Numerical Polynomial Homotopy Continuation Method and String Vacua

Finding vacua for the four-dimensional effective theories for supergravity which descend from flux compactifications and analyzing them according to their stability is one of the central problems in string phenomenology. Except for some simple toy models, it is, however, difficult to find all the vacua analytically. Recently developed algorithmic methods based on symbolic computer algebra can be of great help in the more realistic models. However, they suffer from serious algorithmic complexities and are limited to small system sizes. In this paper, we review a numerical method called the numerical polynomial homotopy continuation (NPHC) method, first used in the areas of lattice field theories, which by construction finds all of the vacua of a given potential that is known to have only isolated solutions. The NPHC method is known to suffer from no major algorithmic complexities and is embarrassingly parallelizable, and hence its applicability goes way beyond the existing symbolic methods. We first solve a simple toy model as a warm-up example to demonstrate the NPHC method at work. We then show that all the vacua of a more complicated model of a compactified M theory model, which has an SU(3) structure, can be obtained by using a desktop machine in just about an hour, a feat which was reported to be prohibitively difficult by the existing symbolic methods. Finally, we compare the various technicalities between the two methods.

[1]  Hans Schönemann,et al.  SINGULAR: a computer algebra system for polynomial computations , 2001, ACCA.

[2]  Yang-Hui He,et al.  Algorithmic algebraic geometry and flux vacua , 2006, hep-th/0606122.

[3]  John J. Cannon,et al.  The Magma Algebra System I: The User Language , 1997, J. Symb. Comput..

[4]  Dhagash Mehta,et al.  Stationary point analysis of the one-dimensional lattice Landau gauge fixing functional, aka random phase XY Hamiltonian , 2010, 1010.5335.

[5]  I Giardina,et al.  Energy landscape of a lennard-jones liquid: statistics of stationary points. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[6]  Andrew J. Sommese,et al.  The numerical solution of systems of polynomials - arising in engineering and science , 2005 .

[7]  J. Gray A Simple Introduction to Gröbner Basis Methods in String Phenomenology , 2009, 0901.1662.

[8]  Jan Verschelde,et al.  Algorithm 795: PHCpack: a general-purpose solver for polynomial systems by homotopy continuation , 1999, TOMS.

[9]  Tsung-Lin Lee,et al.  HOM4PS-2.0: a software package for solving polynomial systems by the polyhedral homotopy continuation method , 2008, Computing.

[10]  Tien-Yien Li Numerical Solution of Polynomial Systems by Homotopy Continuation Methods , 2003 .

[11]  Tangan Gao,et al.  Algorithm 846: MixedVol: a software package for mixed-volume computation , 2005, TOMS.

[12]  E. Davison,et al.  The numerical solution of A'Q+QA =-C , 1968 .

[13]  David A. Cox,et al.  Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms: An Introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry and Commutative Algebra, 3/e (Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics) , 2007 .

[14]  Dhagash Mehta,et al.  Phase transitions detached from stationary points of the energy landscape. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[15]  J. Faugère A new efficient algorithm for computing Gröbner bases (F4) , 1999 .

[16]  D. Mehta,et al.  Lattice Landau gauge via Stereographic Projection , 2008, 0812.2992.

[17]  David A. Cox,et al.  Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms , 1997 .

[18]  Jean Charles Faugère,et al.  A new efficient algorithm for computing Gröbner bases without reduction to zero (F5) , 2002, ISSAC '02.

[19]  James Gray,et al.  STRINGVACUA. A Mathematica package for studying vacuum configurations in string phenomenology , 2008, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[20]  Jonathan P. K. Doye,et al.  Stationary points and dynamics in high-dimensional systems , 2003 .

[21]  Akiko Takeda,et al.  PHoM – a Polyhedral Homotopy Continuation Method for Polynomial Systems , 2004, Computing.

[22]  Layne T. Watson,et al.  Finding all isolated solutions to polynomial systems using HOMPACK , 1989, TOMS.

[23]  Tien-Yien Li Solving polynomial systems , 1987 .

[24]  D. Mehta,et al.  Modified Lattice Landau Gauge , 2007, 0710.2410.

[25]  Frank Sottile,et al.  alphaCertified: certifying solutions to polynomial systems , 2010, ArXiv.

[26]  Dhagash Mehta,et al.  Lattice Landau Gauge and Algebraic Geometry , 2009, 0912.0450.

[27]  D. Mehta,et al.  Lattice vs. Continuum: Landau Gauge Fixing and 't Hooft-Polyakov Monopoles , 2010 .

[28]  R. Podgornik Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters, Biomolecules and Glasses (Cambridge Molecular Science) , 2007 .

[29]  Dhagash Mehta,et al.  Finding all the stationary points of a potential-energy landscape via numerical polynomial-homotopy-continuation method. , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  J. Doye,et al.  Saddle Points and Dynamics of Lennard-Jones Clusters, Solids and Supercooled Liquids , 2001, cond-mat/0108310.

[31]  G. Parisi,et al.  Geometric approach to the dynamic glass transition. , 2001, Physical Review Letters.

[32]  A new method for finding vacua in string phenomenology , 2007, hep-th/0703249.