Requirement design for a reliable and efficient ramp capability product

With increasing intermittent renewable penetration, net load variations and uncertainties increase. When there is a sudden change in wind, real-time dispatches can be short of ramp capabilities from online generators, and offline generators may not respond fast enough. To manage the challenge of maintaining power balance, a ramp capability product is being developed by many ISOs with requirements set based on the Gaussian sigma rule, e.g., 2.5 sigma for the 99% confidence level. However, a simple Monte-Carlo simulation test shows that the realized confidence levels for different numbers of sigma's are generally different from what were prescribed. More importantly, there are significant rooms for cost savings while maintaining the required confidence. How do we design the ramp requirements so that the realized level truly satisfies the required confidence and the cost is optimized in a systematic way? Our idea is to use Monte-Carlo simulation to evaluate realized confidence levels and expected costs by mimicking real-time dispatches. Simulation-based optimization is then used to efficiently minimize the expected cost while maintaining the required confidence. Numerical results show that the designed ramp requirements can effectively manage net load variations and uncertainties at the specified confidence with significant cost savings.

[1]  Jian Ma,et al.  Operational Impacts of Wind Generation on California Power Systems , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  Michael Milligan,et al.  Wind Energy and Power System Operations: A Review of Wind Integration Studies to Date , 2009 .

[3]  Fred Glover,et al.  Practical introduction to simulation optimization , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, 2003..

[4]  Yu-Chi Ho,et al.  Ordinal optimization of DEDS , 1992, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[5]  Nivad Navid,et al.  Market Solutions for Managing Ramp Flexibility With High Penetration of Renewable Resource , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[6]  Brett Ninness,et al.  On Gradient-Based Search for Multivariable System Estimates , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[7]  Michael C. Fu,et al.  Feature Article: Optimization for simulation: Theory vs. Practice , 2002, INFORMS J. Comput..

[8]  Tao Guo,et al.  Integration of renewable resources: Updated analysis of operational requirements and assessment of generation fleet capability under a 20% RPS requirement , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[9]  Yu-Chi Ho,et al.  Constrained Ordinal Optimization—A Feasibility Model Based Approach , 2006, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[10]  P. Havel,et al.  Simulation-based optimization of ancillary services , 2008, 2008 5th International Conference on the European Electricity Market.

[11]  Michael C. Fu,et al.  Optimization for Simulation: Theory vs. Practice , 2002 .

[12]  N. Navid,et al.  Potential new products and models to improve an RTO's ability to manage uncertainty , 2012, 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting.

[13]  R. H. Smith Optimization for Simulation : Theory vs . Practice , 2002 .

[14]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Security-Constrained Unit Commitment With Volatile Wind Power Generation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.